Skip to main content
Log in

Local continuum shape sensitivity with spatial gradient reconstruction

  • RESEARCH PAPER
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Utilizing gradient-based optimization for large scale, multidisciplinary design problems requires accurate and efficient sensitivity or design derivative analysis. In general, numerical sensitivity methods, such as the finite difference method, are easy to implement but can be computationally expensive and inaccurate. In contrast, analytic sensitivity methods, such as the discrete and continuum methods, are highly accurate but can be very difficult, if not infeasible, to implement. A popular compromise is the semi-analytic method, but it too can be highly inaccurate when computing shape design derivatives. Presented here is an alternative method, which is easy to implement and can be as accurate as conventional analytic sensitivity methods. In this paper a general local continuum shape sensitivity method with spatial gradient reconstruction (SGR) is formulated. It is demonstrated that SGR, a numerical technique, can be used to solve the continuous sensitivity equations (CSEs) in a non-intrusive manner. The method is used to compute design derivatives for a variety of applications, including linear static beam bending, linear transient gust analysis of a 2-D beam structure, linear static bending of rectangular plates, and linear static bending of a beam-stiffened plate. Analysis is conducted with Nastran, and both displacement and stress design derivative solutions are presented. For each example the design derivatives are validated with either analytic or finite difference solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akbari J, Kim N, Ahmadi MT (2010) Shape sensitivity analysis with design-dependent loadingsequivalence between continuum and discrete derivatives. Struct Multidiscip Optim

  • Arora J, Haug E (1978) Design sensitivity analysis of elastic mechanical systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 15: 35–62

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Arora J, Haug E (1979) Methods of design sensitivity analysis in structural optimization. AIAA J 17(9), Article No 79-4109

  • Barthelemy B, Haftka RT (1988) Accuracy analysis of the semi-analytical method for shape sensitivity calculation. AIAA-88-2284

  • Bhaskaran R, Berkooz G (1997) Optimization of fluid-structure interaction using the sensitivity equation approach. Fluid-Structure Interaction, Aeroelasticity, Flow-Induced Vibrations and Noise, vol 1, No. 53-1

  • Borggaard J, Burns J (1994) A sensitivity equation approach to shape optimization in fluid flows. Technical Report, Langley Research Center

  • Borggaard J, Burns J (1997) A pde sensitivity equation method for optimal aerodynamic design. J Comput Phys 136

  • Choi K, Kim NH (2005) Structural sensitivity analysis and optimization. Springer Science + Business Media

  • Cross D, Canfield RA (2012a) Continuum shape sensitivity with spatial gradient reconstruction of nonlinear aeroelastic gust response. 14th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Indianapolis, Indiana. AIAA 2012-5597

  • Cross D, Canfield RA (2012b) Solving continuum shape sensitivity with existing tools for nonlinear aeroelastic gust analysis. 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii. AIAA 2012-1923

  • Dems K, Haftka R (1989) Two approaches to sensitivity analysis for shape variation of structures. Mech Struct Mach 16(4)

  • Dems K, Mroz Z (1985) Variational approach to first- and second-order sensitivity analysis of elastic structures. Int J Numer Methods Eng 21

  • Duvigneau R, Pelletier D (2006) On accurate boundary conditions for a shape sensitivity equation method. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 50

  • Etienne S, Pelletier D (2005) General approach to sensitivity analysis of fluid-structure interactions. J Fluids Struct 20(2)

  • Haftka R, Gurdal Z (1992) Elements of structural optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers

  • Haftka RT, Adelman HM (1989) Recent developments in structural sensitivity analysis. Structural Optimization I

  • Liu S, Canfield RA (2012) Continuum shape sensitivity method for fluid flow around an airfoil. 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii. AIAA 2012-1426

  • Liu S, Canfield RA (2013a) Boundary velocity method for continuum shape sensitivity of nonlinear fluid-structure interaction problems. J Fluids Struct

  • Liu S, Canfield RA (2013b) Equivalence of continuum and discrete analytic sensitivity methods for nonlinear differential equations. To Appear in Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Journal

  • Liu S, Canfield RA (2013c) Two forms of continuum shape sensitivity method for fluid-structure interaction problems. To Appear in AIAA Journal

  • Liu S, Wickert PD, Canfield RA (2010) Fluid-structure transient gust response sensitivity for a nonlinear joined wing model. 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Orlando, Florida. AIAA 2010-3118

  • MSC SoftwareCorporation Mdnastran. (2010) User defined services. MD Nastran Documentation

  • Stanley L, Stewart D (2002) Design sensitivity analysis: computational issues of sensitivity equation methods. Academic Press

  • Timoshenko S (1940) Theory of plates and shells. McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc.

  • Turgeon E, Pelletier D, Borggaard J (1999) A continuous sensitivity equation approach to optimal design in mixed convection. AIAA 99–3625

  • Wickert DP (2009) Least-squares, continuous sensitivity analysis for nonlinear fluid-structure interaction. Dissertation, Air Force Institute of Technology

  • Wickert DP, Canfield RA (2008) Least-squares continuous sensitivity analysis of an example fluid-structure interaction problem. 49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Schaumberg, Illinois, AIAA 2008–1896

  • Wickert DP, Canfield RA, Reddy JN (2008) Continuous sensitivity analysis of fluid-structure interaction problems using least-squares finite elements. 12th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. AIAA 2008–5931

  • Wickert DP, Canfield RA, Reddy JN (2009) Fluid-structure transient gust sensitivity using least-squares continuous sensitivity analysis. 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Palm Springs, California. AIAA 2009–2535

  • Zienkiewicz OC, Zhu JZ (1992) The superconvergent patch recovery and a posteriori error estimates. part 1: The recovery technique. Int J Numer Methods Eng 33

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based on research sponsored by Air Force Research Laboratory under agreement number FA8650-09-2-3938 and Air Force Office of Scientific Research under agreement number FA9550-09-1-0354. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Governmental purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation thereon. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of AFRL Senior Aerospace Engineers Dr. Raymond Kolonay, Dr. Ned Lindsley, and Dr. Jose Camberos and the AFOSR program manager Dr. Fariba Fahroo.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M. Cross.

Additional information

The views and conclusions contained herein are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies or endorsements, either expressed or implied, of Air Force Research Laboratory or the U.S. Government.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cross, D.M., Canfield, R.A. Local continuum shape sensitivity with spatial gradient reconstruction. Struct Multidisc Optim 50, 975–1000 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-014-1092-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-014-1092-0

Keywords

Navigation