Skip to main content
Log in

CO 2 and cost optimization of reinforced concrete footings using a hybrid big bang-big crunch algorithm

  • Industrial Application
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A procedure is developed for the design of reinforced concrete footings subjected to vertical, concentric column loads that satisfies both structural requirements and geotechnical limit states using a hybrid Big Bang-Big Crunch (BB-BC) algorithm. The objectives of the optimization are to minimize cost, CO\(_{2}\) emissions, and the weighted aggregate of cost and CO\(_{2}\). Cost is based on the materials and labor required for the construction of reinforced concrete footings and CO\(_{2}\) emissions are associated with the extraction and transportation of raw materials; processing, manufacturing, and fabrication of products; and the emissions of equipment involved in the construction process. The cost and CO\(_{2}\) objective functions are based on weighted values and are subjected to bending moment, shear force, and reinforcing details specified by the American Concrete Institute (ACI 318-11), as well as soil bearing and displacement limits. Two sets of design examples are presented: low-cost and low-CO\(_{2}\) emission designs based solely on geotechnical considerations; and designs that also satisfy the ACI 318-11 code for structural concrete. A multi-objective optimization is applied to cost and CO\(_{2}\) emissions. Results are presented that demonstrate the effects of applied load, soil properties, allowable settlement, and concrete strength on designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Concrete Institute (1991) Standard practice for selecting proportions for normal, heavyweight and mass concrete. ACI 211.1–91

    Google Scholar 

  • American Concrete Institute (2011) Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI 318–11

  • American Society of Civil Engineers (2010) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7–10

  • Camp CV (2007) Design of space trusses using big-bang-big crunch optimization. J Struct Eng 133(7):999–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camp CV, Bichon BJ (2004) Design of space trusses using ant colony optimization. J Struct Eng 130(5):741–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camp CV, Akin A (2012) Design of retaining walls using big bang-big crunch optimization. J Struct Eng 138(3):438–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camp CV, Huq F (2013) CO2 and cost optimization of reinforced concrete frames using a big bang-big crunch algorithm. Eng Struct 48:363–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camp CV, Pezeshk S, Hansson H (2003) Flexural design of reinforced concrete frames using a genetic algorithm. J Struct Eng 129(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coello CA (1999) A comprehensive survey of evolutionary-based multiobjective optimization techniques. Knowl Inf Syst 1:269–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Coello CA, Christiansen AD, Santos F (1997) A simple genetic algorithm for the design of reinforced concrete beams. Eng Comput 13:185–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erol OK, Eksin I (2006) A new optimization method: big bang-big crunch. Adv Eng Softw 37:106–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galton F (1907) Vox Populi. Nature 75:450–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindaraj V, Ramasamy JV (2005) Optimum detailed design of reinforced concrete continuous beams using genetic algorithms. Comput Struct 84:34–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh A, Talatahari S (2009) Size optimization of space trusses using big bang-big crunch algorithm. Comput Struct 87:1129–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh A, Talatahari S (2010) A discrete big bang-big crunch algorithm for optimal design of skeletal structures. Asian J Civil Eng 11(1):103–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Khajehzadeh M, Taha MR, El-Shafie A, Eslami M (2011) Modified particle swarm optimization for optimum design of spread footing and retaining wall. J Zheijiang Univ-Sci A (Appl Phys Eng) 12(6):415–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwak HG, Kim J (2008) Optimum design of reinforced concrete plane frames based on predetermined section database. Comput Aided Des 40:396–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwak HG, Kim J (2009) An integrated genetic algorithm complemented with direct search for optimum design of RC frames. Comput Aided Des 41:490–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CL, Ahn J (2003) Flexural design of reinforced concrete frames by genetic algorithm. J Struct Eng 129(6):762–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepš M, Šejnoha M (2003) New approach to optimization of reinforced concrete beams. Comput Struct 81:1957–1966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marler RT, Arora JS (2004) Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Struct Multidisc Optim 26:369–395

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta PK (2002) Greening of the concrete industry for sustainable development. In: Concrete International, July 23–28

  • Mehta PK, Merman H (2009) Tools for reducing carbon emissions due to cement consumption. In: Structure, January 11–15

  • Mineral Products Association (2010) Summary data. www.mineralproducts.org/sustainability/data.html. 2 August 2012

  • Parsopoulos KE, Vrahatis MN (2002) Particle swarm optimization method in multiobjective problems. In: ACM symposium on applied computing SAC, Madrid, Spain, pp 603–607, March 10–14

  • Paya I, Yepes V, González-Vidosa F, Hospitaler A (2008) Multiobjective optimization of concrete building frames by simulated annealing. Comput-Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 23(8):596–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paya-Zaforteza I, Yepes V, Hospitaler A, González-Vidosa F (2009) CO2-optimization of reinforced concrete frames by simulated annealing. Eng Struct 31:1501–1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perea C, Alcala J, Yepes V, González-Vidosa F, Hospitaler A (2008) Design of reinforced concrete bridge frames by heuristic optimization. Adv Eng Softw 39:676–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulos HG, Davis EH (1974) Elastic solutions for soil and rock mechanics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafiqa MY, Southcombea C (1998) Genetic algorithms in optimal design and detailing of reinforced concrete biaxial columns supported by a declarative approach for capacity checking. Comput Struct 69:443–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajeev S, Krishnamoorthy CS (1998) Genetic algorithms-based methodology for design optimization of reinforced concrete frames. Computer-Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 13:63–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahaba MG, Ashourb AF, Toropovc VV (2004) Cost optimisation of reinforced concrete flat slab buildings. Eng Struct 27:313–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarma KC, Adeli H (1998) Cost optimization of concrete structures. J Struct Eng 124(5):570–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suman (2004) Study of simulated annealing based algorithms for multiobjective optimization of a constrained problem. Comput Chem Eng 28:1849–1871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007). In: Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK, Reisinger A (eds) Climate Change (2007): Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesic AS (1975) Bearing capacity of shallow foundations. In: Winterkorn H, Fang HY (eds) Foundation engineering handbook, Chap 3. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Villalba P, Alcalá J, Yepes V, González-Vidosa F (2010) CO2 optimization of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining walls. In: 2nd International Conference on Engineering Optimization, September 6–9. Lisbon, Portugal

  • Wang Y (2009) Reliability-based economic design optimization of spread foundations. J Struct Eng 135(7):954–959

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Kulhawy FH (2008) Economic design optimization of foundations. J Geotech Geoenviron 134(8):1097–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitman RV, Richart FE (1967) Dynamic procedures for dynamically loaded foundations. J Soil Mech Found Div 93(SM6):169–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Yepes V, González-Vidosa F, Alcalá J, Villalba P (2012) CO2 optimization design of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining walls based on a VNS-threshold acceptance strategy. J Comput Civ Eng 26(3):378–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. Roger Meier and Mr. Daniel Rocha, P.E. for providing constructive comments and guidance during the course of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles V. Camp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Camp, C.V., Assadollahi, A. CO 2 and cost optimization of reinforced concrete footings using a hybrid big bang-big crunch algorithm. Struct Multidisc Optim 48, 411–426 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0897-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0897-6

Keywords

Navigation