A feasible directions algorithm for nonlinear complementarity problems and applications in mechanics
 José Herskovits,
 Sandro R. Mazorche
 … show all 2 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discount
Rent now* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Abstract
Complementarity problems are involved in mathematical models of several applications in engineering, economy and different branches of physics. We mention contact problems and dynamics of multiple bodies systems in solid mechanics. In this paper we present a new feasible direction algorithm for nonlinear complementarity problems. This one begins at an interior point, strictly satisfying the inequality conditions, and generates a sequence of interior points that converges to a solution of the problem. At each iteration, a feasible direction is obtained and a line search performed, looking for a new interior point with a lower value of an appropriate potential function. We prove global convergence of the present algorithm and present a theoretical study about the asymptotic convergence. Results obtained with several numerical test problems, and also application in mechanics, are described and compared with other well known techniques. All the examples were solved very efficiently with the present algorithm, employing always the same set of parameters.
 Arora JS (2004) Introduction to optimum design, 2nd edn. Academic, London
 Baiocchi C, Capelo A (1984) Variational and quasivariational inequalities. Applications to freeboundary problems. Wiley, Chichester
 Bazaraa MS, Shetty CM (1979) Theory and algorithms. Nonlinear programming. Wiley, New York
 Chen C, Mangasarian OL (1996) A class of smoothing functions for nonlinear and mixed complementarity problems. Comput Optim Appl 5:97–138 CrossRef
 Chen X, Ye Y (2000) On smoothing methods for the P_0 matrix linear complementarity problem. SIAM J Optim 11:341–363 CrossRef
 Christensen PW, Klarbring A , Pang JS, Stroömberg N (1998) Formulation and comparison of algorithms for frictional contact problems. Int J Num Meth Eng 42:145–173 CrossRef
 Crank J (1984) Free and moving boundary problems. Oxford University Press, New York
 Dennis JE, Schnabel RB (1996) Numerical methods for unconstrained optimization and nonlinear equations. SIAM, Philadelphia
 Fathi Y (1979) Computational complexity of LCPs associated with positive definite symmetric matrices. Math Program 17:335–344 CrossRef
 Ferris MC, Kanzow C (2002) Complementarity and related problems: a survey. Handbook of applied optimization. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 514–530
 Ferris MC, Pang JS (1997) Engineering and economic applications of complementarity problems. SIAM Rev 39:669–713 CrossRef
 Fischer A (1992) A special newtontype optimization method. Optim 24:269–284 CrossRef
 Geiger C, Kanzow C (1996) On the resolution of monotone complementarity problems. Comput Optim Appl 5:155–173 CrossRef
 Harker PT (1998) Accelerating the convergence of the diagonal and projection algorithms for finitedimensional variational inequalities. Math Program 41:29–59 CrossRef
 Herskovits J (1982) Développement d’une méthode númerique pour l’Optimisation non linéaire. Dr. Ing. Thesis, Paris IX University, INRIARocquencourt (in English)
 Herskovits J (1986) A twostage feasible directions algorithm for nonlinear constrained optimization. Math Program 36:19–38 CrossRef
 Herskovits J (1995) A view on nonlinear optimizaton. In: Herskovits J (ed) Advances in structural optimization. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 71–117
 Herskovits J (1998) A feasible directions interior point technique for nonlinear optimization. J Optim Theory Appl 99(1):121–146 CrossRef
 Herskovits J, Santos G (1998) Feasible arc interior point algorithm for nonlinear optimization. In: Fourth world congress on computational mechanics, (in CDROM), Buenos Aires, June–July 1998
 Herskovits J, Leontiev A, Dias G, Santos G (2000) Contact shape optimization: a bilevel programming approach. Struct Multidisc Optim 20:214–221 CrossRef
 Herskovits J, Mappa P, Goulart E, Mota Soares CM (2005) Mathematical programming models and algorithms for engineering design optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194(30–33):3244–3268 CrossRef
 Hock W, Schittkowski K (1981) Test example for nonlinear programming codes. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
 Jiang H, Qi L (1997) A new nonsmooth equations approach to nonlinear complementarity problems. SIAM J Control Optim 35(1):178–193 CrossRef
 Kanzow C (1994) Some equationbased methods for the nonlinear complementarity problem. Optim Methods Softw 3:327–340 CrossRef
 Kanzow C (1996) Nonlinear complementarity as unconstrained optimization. J Optim Theory Appl 88:139–155 CrossRef
 Kinderlehrer D, Stampacchia G (1984) An introduction to variational. Oxford University Press, New York
 Leontiev A, Huacasi W (2001) Mathematical programming approach for unconfined seepage flow problem. Eng Anal Bound Elem 25:49–56 CrossRef
 Leontiev A, Huacasi W, Herskovits J (2002) An optimization technique for the solution of the signorini problem using the boundary element method. Struct Multidisc Optim 24:72–77 CrossRef
 Mangasarian OL (1973) Equivalence of the complementarity problem to a system of nonlinear equations. SIAM J Appl Math 31:89–92 CrossRef
 Mangasarian OL, Solodov MV (1993) Nonlinear complementarity as unconstrainede and constrained minimization. Math Program (Serie B) 62:277–297 CrossRef
 Murphy FH, Sherali HD, Soyster AL (1982) A mathematical programming approach for determining oligopolistic market equilibrium. Math Program 24:92–106 CrossRef
 Murty KG (1988) Limear complementarity, linear and nonlinear programming. Sigma series in applied mathematics, vol 3. Heldermann, Berlin
 Petersson J (1995) Behaviourally constrained contact force optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 9:189–193
 Qi L, Sun D (1998) Nonsmooth equations and smoothing newton methods. Technical Report, School of Mathematics, University of New South Wales, Sydney
 Subramanian PK (1993) GaussNewton methods for the complementarity problem. J Optim Theory Appl 77:467–482 CrossRef
 Tanoh G, Renard Y, Noll D (2004) Computational experience with an interior point algorithm for large scale contact problems. Optimization Online
 TinLoi F (1999a) On the numerical solution of a class of unilateral contact structural optimization problems. Struct Multidisc Optim 17:155–161
 TinLoi F (1999b) A smoothing scheme for a minimum weight problem in structural plasticity. Struct Multidisc Optim 17:279–285
 Tseng P (1997) An infeasible pathfollowing method for mono tone complementarity problems. SIAM J Optim 7:386–402 CrossRef
 Vanderplaats G (1999) Numerical optimization techniques for engineering design, 3rd edn. VR&D, Colorado Springs
 Wright SJ (1997) Primaldual interiorpoint methods. SIAM, Philadelphia
 Yamashita N, Fukushima M (1995) On stationary points of the implicit lagrangian for nonlinear complementarity problems. J Optim Theory Appl 84:653–663 CrossRef
 Yamashita N, Dan H, Fukushima M (2004) On the identification of degenerate indices in the nonlinear complementarity problem with the proximal point algorithm. Math Programming 99:377–397 CrossRef
 Xu S (2000) The global linear convergence of an infeasible noninterior pathfollowing algorithm for complemenarity problems with uniform Pfunctions. Math Program 87:501–517 CrossRef
 Zouain N, Herskovits J, Borges LA, Feijóo RA (1993) An iterative algorithm for limit analysis with nonlinear yield functions. Int J Solids Struct 30(10):1397–1417 CrossRef
 Title
 A feasible directions algorithm for nonlinear complementarity problems and applications in mechanics
 Journal

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
Volume 37, Issue 5 , pp 435446
 Cover Date
 20090201
 DOI
 10.1007/s0015800802525
 Print ISSN
 1615147X
 Online ISSN
 16151488
 Publisher
 SpringerVerlag
 Additional Links
 Topics
 Keywords

 Feasible direction algorithm
 Interior point algorithm
 Nonlinear complementarity problems
 Variational formulations in mechanics
 Industry Sectors
 Authors

 José Herskovits ^{(1)}
 Sandro R. Mazorche ^{(2)}
 Author Affiliations

 1. COPPE, Mechanical Eng. Prog., Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 68503, 21945 970, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
 2. Department of Mathematics, UFJF, ICE Campus Universitário, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, CEP 36036330, Juiz de ForaMG, Brazil