The polarized Ramsey’s theorem Authors Damir D. Dzhafarov Jeffry L. Hirst Appalachian State University Article

First Online: 31 October 2008 Received: 06 May 2008 Revised: 19 July 2008 DOI :
10.1007/s00153-008-0108-0

Cite this article as: Dzhafarov, D.D. & Hirst, J.L. Arch. Math. Logic (2009) 48: 141. doi:10.1007/s00153-008-0108-0
Abstract We study the effective and proof-theoretic content of the polarized Ramsey’s theorem, a variant of Ramsey’s theorem obtained by relaxing the definition of homogeneous set. Our investigation yields a new characterization of Ramsey’s theorem in all exponents, and produces several combinatorial principles which, modulo bounding for \({\Sigma^0_2}\) formulas, lie (possibly not strictly) between Ramsey’s theorem for pairs and the stable Ramsey’s theorem for pairs.

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000) 03B30 03F35 03D80 05D10 We are grateful to D. Hirschfeldt, A. Montalbán, and R. Soare for making our collaboration possible and for helpful comments and suggestions. We thank J. Schmerl for first bringing the subject of polarized partitions to our attention and J. Mileti for his generous insights. We also thank one anonymous referee for valuable observations and corrections. The first author was partially supported by an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship.

References 1.

Cholak P.A., Jockusch C.G. Jr, Slaman T.A.: On the strength of Ramsey’s theorem for pairs. J. Symbolic Logic

66 (1), 1–55 (2001)

MATH CrossRef MathSciNet 2.

Downey R., Hirschfeldt D.R., Lempp S., Solomon R.: A

\({\Delta^0_2}\) set with no infinite low subset in either it or its complement. J. Symbolic Logic

66 (3), 1371–1381 (2001)

MATH CrossRef MathSciNet 3.

Erdős P., Rado R.: A partition calculus in set theory. Bull. Am. Math. Soc.

62 , 427–489 (1965)

CrossRef 4.

Giusto M., Simpson S.G.: Located sets and reverse mathematics. J. Symbolic Logic

65 (3), 1451–1480 (2000)

MATH CrossRef MathSciNet 5.

Hájek P., Pudlák P.: Metamathematics of first-order arithmetic. Perspectives in Mathematical Logic. Springer, Berlin (1993)

6.

Hirschfeldt, D.R., Jockusch, C.G., Jr., Kjos-Hanssen, B., Lempp, S., Slaman, T.A.: The strength of some combinatorial principles related to Ramsey’s theorem for pairs. In: Chong, C.T., Feng, Q., Slaman, T., Woodin, H., Yang, Y. (eds.) Proceedings of the Program on Computational Prospects of Infinity, Singapore 2005. World Scientific Press, Singapore (to appear) (2005)

7.

Hirschfeldt D.R., Shore R.A.: Combinatorial principles weaker than Ramsey’s theorem for pairs. J. Symbolic Logic

72 (1), 171–206 (2007)

MATH CrossRef MathSciNet 8.

Hirst, J.L.: Combinatorics in subsystems of second order arithmetic, Ph.D. thesis, The Pennsylvania State University (1987)

9.

Jockusch C.G. Jr: Ramsey’s theorem and recursion theory. J. Symbolic Logic

37 (2), 268–280 (1972)

MATH CrossRef MathSciNet 10.

Jockusch C.G. Jr, McLaughlin T.G.: Countable retracing functions and

\({\Pi^0_2}\) predicates. Pacific J. Math.

30 (1), 67–93 (1969)

MATH MathSciNet 11.

Mileti, J.R.: Partition theorems and computability theory, Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2004)

12.

Mileti J.R.: Partition theorems and computability theory. Bull. Symbolic Logic

11 (3), 411–427 (2005)

MATH CrossRef 13.

Seetapun, D., Slaman, T.A.: On the strength of Ramsey’s theorem. Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 36(4), 570–582. Special Issue: Models of arithmetic (1995)

14.

Simpson S.G.: Subsystems of second order arithmetic. Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1999)

MATH 15.

Soare, R.I.: Recursively enumerable sets and degrees. Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, A study of computable functions and computably generated sets (1987)