Abstract
The aim of this paper was to provide a background review to assist experimental, survey and field studies that will start emerging on the effects of robot crime interviewers on children and on forensic investigations. The paper captures topics such as describing how, historically, technology has determined our legal systems, criminal investigations and, of course, children’s forensic testimonies. It discusses studies that have already explored the idea of robot crime interviewers in the context of relevant ethical concerns as well as experimental studies on the different ways in which children react in an interview elicited by a human compared with a robot interviewer. The article continues by suggesting research methodological designs that could benefit studies exploring robot interviews with children such as a robot exposure phase prior to the main data collection, the robot’s “personality” and the instructions given to children for semi-autonomous interviewers. This is based on the available literature on human–robot interactions. There is an attempt here to provide a literature review and methodological suggestions to form future studies on robot crime interviewers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beran TN, Ramirez-Serrano A, Kuzyk R, Fior M, Nugent S (2011) Understanding how children understand robots: perceived animism in child–robot interaction. Int J Hum Comput Stud 69:539–550
Bethel CL, Stevenson MR, Scassellati B (2011) Sharing a secret: interactions between a child, robot and adult. Lausanne, Switzerland
Bethel CL, Eakin D, Andreddy S, Stuart JK, Carruth D (2013) Eyewitnesses are misled by human but not robot interviewers. In: 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction
Black MM, Ponirakis A (2000) Computer-Administered interviews with children about maltreatment: methodological, developmental and ethical issues. J Interpers Violence 15:682–695
Block DS, Oran H, Oran D, Baumrind N, Goodman GS (2010) Abused and neglected children in court: knowledge and attitudes. Child Abuse Negl 34:659–670
Campbell-Kelly M, Aspray W (2004) Computer: a History of the information machine, 2nd edn. Westview Press, New York
Cashmore J (2002) Innovative procedures for child witnesses. In: Davies GM, Bull RH (eds) Children’s testimony: a handbook of psychological research and forensic practice. Wiley, West Sussex, pp 203–217
Davies GM, Noon E (1991) An evaluation of the live link for child witnesses. The Home Office, London
Davies G, Wilson C, Mitchell R, Milsom J (1995) Videotaping children’s evidence: an evaluation. Home Office, London
Dickson WKL, Dickson A (1894) The life and inventions of Thomas Alva Edison. Chatto and Windus, London
Doherty-Sneddon G, McAuley S (2000) Influence of video mediation on adult-child interviews: implications for the use of the live link with child witnesses. Appl Cogn Psychol 14:379–392
Doherty-Sneddon G, Anderson AH, O’Malley C, Langton S, Garrod S, Bruce V (1997) Face-to-face and video mediated communication: a comparison of dialogue structure and task performance. J Exp Psychol Appl 3:1–21
Druin A (1999) Cooperative inquiry: developing new technologies for children with children. In: Proceedings of the CHI’99, Pittsburgh, USA, pp 592–599
Eisenstein E (1980) The printing press as an agent of change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Fong T, Nourbakhsh I, Dautenhahn K (2003) A survey of socially interactive robots. Robot Auton Syst 42:143–166
Ghetti S, Alexander KW, Goodman GS (2002) Children in the legal system: consequences and interventions. Int J Law Psychiatry 25:235–251
Goetz J, Kiesler S (2002) Cooperation with a robotic assistant. In: Proceedings of the CHI’02 conference on human factors in computing systems, New York, USA, pp 578–579
Goodman GS, Tobey AE, Batterman-Funce JM, Orcutt H, Thomas S, Shapiro C et al (1998) Face-to-face confrontation: effects of closed circuit technology on children’s eyewitness testimony and jurors’ decisions. Law Hum Behav 22:165–203
Gribble JN, Miller HG, Rogers SM, Turner CF (1999) Interview mode and measurement of sexual behaviors: methodological issues. J Sex Res 36:16–24
Kahn PH, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Freier NG, Severson RL, Gill BT, Ruckert JH, Shen S (2012) “Robovie, you’ll have to go into the closet now”: children’s social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. Dev Psychol 48:303–314
Köhnken G (2002) A German perspective on children’s testimony. In: Westcott LH, Davies GM, Bull RG (eds) Children’s testimony: a handbook of psychological research and forensic practice. Wiley, New York
Kucuktepe C (2010) Examination of question types used by elementary school teachers in the process of teaching and learning. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2:5190–5195
Kyriakidou M (2012) Evaluation of children’s testimonies in the Republic of Cyprus: implications for criminal and legal procedures. PhD Thesis Sheffield University, 2012
Kyriakidou M, Sharkey A, Blades M (2013) Ethical dilemmas for children’s robot crime interviewers. First UKRE workshop on robot ethics, University of Sheffield, 25 March 2013
MacFarlane K, Krebs S (1986) Videotaping of interviews and court testimony. In: MacFarlane K, Waterman J et al (eds) Sexual Abuse of Young Children. The Guilford Press, New York, pp 164–196
Marett RR (1914) The threshold of religion. Methuen and Co., London
Masson JM (1984) Assault on the truth. Farrar Straus, New York
Michotte A (1963) The perception of causality. Basic Books, New York
Miller GM, Fontes NE (1979) Videotape on trial: a view from the jury box. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills
Millstein SG, Irwin CE (1983) Acceptability of computer-acquired sexual histories in adolescent girls. J Paediatr 103:815–819
Moriguchi Y, Lee K, Itakura S (2007) Social transmission of disinhibition in young children. Dev Sci 10:481–491
Moriguchi Y, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Itakura S (2010) Children perseverate to a human’s actions but not to a robot’s actions. Dev Sci 13:62–68
National Research Council (1993) Understanding child abuse and neglect. National Academy Press, Washington
Paperny DM, Aono JY, Lehman RM, Hammas SL, Risser J (1990) Computer-administed detection and intervention in adolescent high-risk health behaviors. J Pediatr 116:456–462
Raimondo-Souto M (2006) Motion picture photography: a history, 1891–1960. McFarland & Company, Jefferson
Rose SA, Blank M (1974) The potency of context in children’s cognition: an illustration through conservation. Child Dev 45:199–502
Scopelliti M, Giuliani MV, D’Amico AM, Fornara F (2004) If I had a robot at home… People’s representation of domestic robots. In: Keates S, Clarkson J, Langdon P, Robinson P (eds) Designing a more inclusive world. Springer, Cambridge
Severinson-Eklundh K, Green A, Hüttenrauch H (2003) Social and collaborative aspects of interaction with a service robot. Robot Auton Syst 42:223–234
Somanader MC, Saylor MM, Levin DT (2011) Remote control and children’s understanding of robots. J Exp Child Psychol 109:239–247
Spencer JR, Flin R (1993) The evidence of children: the law and the psychology, 2nd edn. Blackstone Press Limited, London
Syrdal DS, Koay KL, Walters ML, Dautenhahn K (2009) The boy–robot should bark! Children’s impressions of agent migration into diverse embodiments. In: Proceedings of the new frontiers in HRI symposium
Tremoulet PD, Feldman J (2000) Perception of animacy from the motion of a single object. Perception 29:943–951
Wood LJ, Dautenhahn K, Rainer A, Robins B, Lehmann H, Syrdal DS (2013) Robot-mediated interviews—how effective is a humanoid robot as a tool for interviewing young children? PLOS one 8:1–13
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Prof. Tony Prescott, Dr. Amanda Sharkey and Dr. Mark Blades from the University of Sheffield for their support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kyriakidou, M. Discussing robot crime interviewers for children’s forensic testimonies: a relatively new field for investigation. AI & Soc 31, 121–126 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-014-0566-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-014-0566-3