AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 3–17

Computational dialectic and rhetorical invention

Original Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00146-010-0279-1

Cite this article as:
Walton, D. AI & Soc (2011) 26: 3. doi:10.1007/s00146-010-0279-1
  • 178 Downloads

Abstract

This paper has three dimensions, historical, theoretical and social. The historical dimension is to show how the Ciceronian system of dialectical argumentation served as a precursor to computational models of argumentation schemes such as Araucaria and Carneades. The theoretical dimension is to show concretely how these argumentation schemes reveal the interdependency of rhetoric and logic, and so the interdependency of the normative with the empirical. It does this by identifying points of disagreement in a dialectical format through using argumentation schemes and critical questions. The social dimension is to show how the Ciceronian dialectical viewpoint integrates with the use of computational tools that can be used to support the principle of reason-based deliberation and facilitate deliberative democracy.

Keywords

Argumentation schemes Informal logic Ciceronian rhetoric Carneades model Deliberative democracy Fallacies Persuasion 

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric (CRRAR)University of WindsorWindsorUSA