Impact of positive end-expiratory pressure on the definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Estenssoro, E., Dubin, A., Laffaire, E. et al. Intensive Care Med (2003) 29: 1936. doi:10.1007/s00134-003-1943-4
- 120 Views
We examined whether PEEP during the first hours of ARDS can induce such a change in oxygenation that could mask fulfillment of the AECC criteria of a PaO2/FIO2 ≤ 200 essential for ARDS diagnosis.
Design and setting
Observational, prospective cohort in two medical-surgical ICU in teaching hospitals.
48 consecutive patients who met AECC criteria of ARDS on 0 PEEP (ZEEP) at the moment of diagnosis.
Measurements and results
PaO2/FIO2 and lung mechanics were recorded on admission (0 h) to the ICU on ZEEP, and after 6, 12, and 24 h on PEEP levels selected by attending physicians. Lung Injury Score (LIS) was calculated at 0 and 24 h. PaO2/FIO2 rose significantly from 121±45 on ZEEP at 0 h, to 234±85 on PEEP of 12.8±3.7 cmH2O after 24 h. LIS did not change significantly (2.34±0.53 vs. 2.42±0.62). These variables behaved similarly in pulmonary and extrapulmonary ARDS, and in survivors and nonsurvivors. After 24 h only 18 patients (38%) still had a PaO2/FIO2 of 200 or lower. Their mortality was similar to that in the remaining patients (61% vs. 53%).
The use of PEEP improved oxygenation such that one-half of patients after 6 h, and most after 24 h did not fulfill AECC hypoxemia criteria of ARDS. However, LIS remained stable in the overall series. These results suggest that PEEP level should be taken into consideration for ARDS diagnosis.