The prevalence of autism spectrum disorders: impact of diagnostic instrument and non-response bias
- M. PosserudAffiliated withCentre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Unifob Health Email author
- , Astri J. LundervoldAffiliated withDepartment of Biological and Medical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen
- , Stein Atle LieAffiliated withCentre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Unifob Health
- , Christopher GillbergAffiliated withChild and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Gothenburg
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
A large part of the variability in rates of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) across studies is non-aetiologic, and can be explained by differences in diagnostic criteria, case-finding method, and other issues of study design.
To investigate the effects on ASD prevalence of two methodological issues; non-response bias and case ascertainment. We compared the findings of using a semi-structured parent interview versus in-depth clinical assessment, including an ASD specific interview. We further explored whether including information on non-responders affected the ASD prevalence estimate.
A total population of 7- to 9-year olds (N = 9,430) was screened for ASD with the autism spectrum screening questionnaire (ASSQ) in the Bergen Child Study (BCS). Children scoring above the 98th percentile on parent and/or teacher ASSQ were invited to participate in the second and subsequently in the third phase of the BCS where they were assessed for ASD using the Development and Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA), and the Diagnostic Interview for Social and Communication disorders (DISCO), respectively.
Clinical assessment using DISCO confirmed all DAWBA ASD cases, but also diagnosed additional cases. DISCO-generated minimum prevalence for ASD was 0.21%, whereas estimated prevalence was 0.72%, increasing to 0.87% when adjusting for non-responders. The DAWBA estimate for the same population was 0.44%.
Large variances in prevalence rates across studies can be explained by methodological differences. Both information about assessment method and non-response are crucial when interpreting prevalence rates of ASD.
KeywordsAutism spectrum disorders Prevalence Non-response bias Diagnostic instrument Assessment method
- The prevalence of autism spectrum disorders: impact of diagnostic instrument and non-response bias
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Volume 45, Issue 3 , pp 319-327
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Autism spectrum disorders
- Non-response bias
- Diagnostic instrument
- Assessment method
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Unifob Health, Jonas Lies vei 91, 5009, Bergen, Norway
- 2. Department of Biological and Medical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Jonas Lies vei 91, 5009, Bergen, Norway
- 3. Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Unifob Health, P.O. 7800, 5020, Bergen, Norway
- 4. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Gothenburg, Kungsgatan 12, 411 19, Göteborg, Sweden