, Volume 57, Issue 9, pp 1807–1811

Incretin, insulinotropic and glucose-lowering effects of whey protein pre-load in type 2 diabetes: a randomised clinical trial

  • Daniela Jakubowicz
  • Oren Froy
  • Bo Ahrén
  • Mona Boaz
  • Zohar Landau
  • Yosefa Bar-Dayan
  • Tali Ganz
  • Maayan Barnea
  • Julio Wainstein
Short Communication

DOI: 10.1007/s00125-014-3305-x

Cite this article as:
Jakubowicz, D., Froy, O., Ahrén, B. et al. Diabetologia (2014) 57: 1807. doi:10.1007/s00125-014-3305-x



Since protein ingestion is known to stimulate the secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), we hypothesised that enhancing GLP-1 secretion to harness its insulinotropic/beta cell-stimulating activity with whey protein pre-load may have beneficial glucose-lowering effects in type 2 diabetes.


In a randomised, open-label crossover clinical trial, we studied 15 individuals with well-controlled type 2 diabetes who were not taking any medications except for sulfonylurea or metformin. These participants consumed, on two separate days, 50 g whey in 250 ml water or placebo (250 ml water) followed by a standardised high-glycaemic-index breakfast in a hospital setting. Participants were randomised using a coin flip. The primary endpoints of the study were plasma concentrations of glucose, intact GLP-1 and insulin during the 30 min following meal ingestion.


In each group, 15 patients were analysed. The results showed that over the whole 180 min post-meal period, glucose levels were reduced by 28% after whey pre-load with a uniform reduction during both early and late phases. Insulin and C-peptide responses were both significantly higher (by 105% and 43%, respectively) with whey pre-load. Notably, the early insulin response was 96% higher after whey. Similarly, both total GLP-1 (tGLP-1) and intact GLP-1 (iGLP-1) levels were significantly higher (by 141% and 298%, respectively) with whey pre-load. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 plasma activity did not display any significant difference after breakfast between the groups.


In summary, consumption of whey protein shortly before a high-glycaemic-index breakfast increased the early prandial and late insulin secretion, augmented tGLP-1 and iGLP-1 responses and reduced postprandial glycaemia in type 2 diabetic patients. Whey protein may therefore represent a novel approach for enhancing glucose-lowering strategies in type 2 diabetes.

Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01571622

Funding The Israeli Ministry of Health and Milk Council funded the research.


BreakfastDiabetesGLP-1Metabolic syndromeWhey



Dipeptidyl peptidase 4


Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide


Glucagon-like peptide-1


Intact GLP-1


Total GLP-1


One of the earliest changes in the development of type 2 diabetes is the loss of early postprandial insulin response, a change which contributes to postprandial hyperglycaemia. Therefore, targeting the early postprandial insulin response is an important glucose-lowering strategy in treating type 2 diabetes [1]. One such potential approach is to augment the beta cell response to glucose by a primary stimulus, as has been observed after sequential OGTTs and with IVGTTs or hyperglycaemic clamps [1, 2]. Another approach is to target the incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), which is an important mediator for the postprandial insulin response [3]. Indeed, it has been shown that incretin-based therapies, such as GLP-1 receptor agonists [3] and inhibitors of GLP-1 inactivating protease, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) [4], augment the insulin secretory response to meal ingestion by enhancing mainly the early phase of insulin secretion in type 2 diabetes patients. Whether combining these two approaches by using increased GLP-1 secretion as a primary stimulus to a subsequent meal ingestion may further improve insulin secretion is not known.

In this study, we report that such an approach with a primary stimulus is indeed achievable by using whey protein, which accounts for 20% of whole-milk protein and is known to stimulate both incretin hormone secretion and insulin secretion [5]. The approach was to serve a pre-meal load of whey protein followed by a regular meal, to examine this pre-stimulus on postprandial GLP-1 and insulin secretion.


Study population

The study population comprised 15 participants (electronic supplementary material [ESM] Table 1) with type 2 diabetes. Patients taking anorectic drugs, steroids, medications known to affect gastric motility or oral hypoglycaemic agents other than sulfonylurea or metformin were excluded. The study was approved by the Helsinki Committee of the Wolfson Medical Center in Holon, Israel. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov registration No. NCT01571622.

Study design

This was a randomised, open label crossover clinical trial (ESM Fig. 1). Participants were randomised using a coin flip. Each participant consumed two test meals separated by a washout period of at least 2 weeks. At the first visit, participants were randomised to consume a pre-meal drink with either 50 g [920 kJ (220 kcal)] whey protein concentrate (Beit Haemek Advanced Technologies, Beit Haemek, Israel) dissolved in water or water (placebo). A fasting blood sample (t = −30 min) was taken and the pre-meal drinks were served. Blood samples were taken at t = 0 min and, immediately after, participants were served a high-glycaemic-index 1,477 kJ (353 kcal) breakfast. Thereafter, blood samples were drawn at t = 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180 min. Glucose was assessed using an analyser, insulin and C-peptide were measured by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and total GLP-1 (tGLP-1) and intact GLP-1 (iGLP-1) were quantified by ELISA. DPP-4 activity was assessed as previously described [5]. On the second visit, each participant was crossed over to the opposite pre-meal drink.

Power calculation and statistical analyses

The primary endpoints of the study were the AUCs for plasma concentrations of glucose, intact GLP-1 and insulin during the 30 min following meal ingestion. Secondary endpoints were the 30 min AUC for concentrations of C-peptide, total GLP-1 and DPP-4. Exploratory analysis also included AUCs for other time intervals. In this study, we examined 15 participants, based on the known variation in AUC for intact GLP-1 and insulin and assuming a 30% difference by the pre-stimulus and desiring to detect this difference with 80% probability; this resulted in the requirement of 15 participants and to allow for discontinuation 19 participants were recruited. The results are expressed as mean ± SEM. For time series, a two-way ANOVA was performed and a least-significant difference t test post hoc analysis was used for comparison between the groups at each time point. For the comparison of fasting with postprandial time points within a group, Dunnet’s post hoc test was performed. Student’s t test was used for comparing AUCs at different time intervals. In addition, a multivariate ANOVA for repeated measurements was performed, assessing between- and within-subject effects for diet and time.


Glucose, insulin and C-peptide

Fasting glucose, insulin and C-peptide levels did not differ significantly between the two test days or the groups (Fig. 1). In the early interval AUC0–30 min, plasma glucose excursions were significantly lower in the whey pre-load group (Fig. 1a, Table 1). Similarly, plasma glucose excursions were significantly lower at the late interval AUC60–120 min, and during the complete post-meal period (0–180 min), after whey pre-load compared with placebo (Fig. 1a, Table 1).
Fig. 1

Meal tolerance test of whey or placebo pre-load. Participants consumed a pre-meal 250 ml drink of either 50 g whey protein concentrate or water (placebo). Blood samples were taken immediately before the pre-load (t = −30 min) and every 30 min thereafter. Participants were served a high-glycaemic-index breakfast instantly after the second blood sample (t = 0). For every time point, blood samples were analysed for glucose (a), insulin (b), C-peptide (c), tGLP-1 (d), iGLP-1 (e) and DPP-4 activity (h). In addition, the iGLP/tGLP ratio (f) and the correlation of insulin to iGLP (r = 0.18, placebo; r = 0.52, whey) (g) were calculated. Values are means ± SEM, n = 15, *p < 0.05 vs placebo for the same time point. For parts (af, h): black circles, placebo; white circles, whey protein. For part (g): grey circles, placebo; white triangles, whey protein

Table 1

AUC for the variables for the different time intervals


AUC interval (min)a



p value

Change (%)

Glucose (mmol/l × min)

−30 to 0

20.4 ± 0.9

20 ± 0.7





29 ± 1.5

22.5 ± 0.9





79.9 ± 5.2

56.5 ± 3.7





213.6 ± 13.8

154 ± 8.5



Insulin (pmol/l × min)

−30 to 0

1,472 ± 241

1,958 ± 325





3,815 ± 438

7,491 ± 1,023





19,091 ± 3,011

39,485 ± 5,693





44,995 ± 6,626

92,110 ± 12,903



C-peptide (nmol/l × min)

−30 to 0

25 ± 2

27 ± 3





36 ± 3

45 ± 4





140 ± 11

208 ± 17





367 ± 30

526 ± 42



tGLP (pmol/l × min)

−30 to 0

388 ± 40

493 ± 61





642 ± 64

1,631 ± 114





1,283 ± 188

3,040 ± 194





3,576 ± 416

8,635 ± 473



iGLP-1 (pmol/l × min)

−30 to 0

168 ± 25

209 ± 34





239 ± 36

812 ± 107





427 ± 68

1,845 ± 203





1,264 ± 183

5,035 ± 537



DPP-4 (pmol × min)

−30 to 0

7,230 ± 782

8,368 ± 889




7,070 ± 798

8,119 ± 1,009




13,697 ± 1,458

16,233 ± 1,597




42,187 ± 4,416

48,090 ± 5,100



Data are means ± SEM, n = 15

aAUCs of the pre-meal interval (−30 to 0 min), post-meal intervals (0–30 or 60–120 min) and total interval (0–180 min) were calculated by the trapezoidal rule

Whey protein significantly increased the postprandial early insulin release. Plasma insulin levels at the first 30 min were higher and increased more rapidly after whey pre-load (Fig. 1b, Table 1). Over the late interval, AUC60–120 min, and during the complete post-meal period (0–180 min), plasma insulin levels were also significantly higher after whey pre-load than after placebo (Fig. 1b, Table 1). After meal ingestion, C-peptide levels mirrored those of insulin, with a more rapid and higher increase after whey pre-load (Fig. 1c, Table 1).

GLP-1 levels and DPP4 activity

Higher incremental AUCiGLP-1 and AUCtGLP-1 were observed during all intervals after whey pre-load (Table 1). The peak levels of iGLP-1 and tGLP-1 were higher with whey pre-load. Consequently, during the early interval, whey protein pre-load elicited higher AUC0–30 min for tGLP-1 and iGLP-1 concentrations (Fig. 1d, e, Table 1). Similarly, during the late interval (60–120 min), increased tGLP-1 and iGLP-1 was observed after whey pre-load. The ratio iGLP-1/tGLP-1 was significantly higher throughout the postprandial period after whey pre-load (Fig. 1f). Positive correlation of insulin to iGLP-1 was marginally significant after placebo, but significant after whey pre-load (Fig. 1g). DPP4 plasma activity did not display any significant difference after breakfast between the placebo and whey pre-loads (Fig. 1h).


In the present study, we show that a breakfast pre-load of whey protein leads to reduced peak and incremental area for post-meal glucose. This glucose-lowering effect of pre-stimulation with whey was associated with rapid and significantly enhanced early and late prandial insulin response. Furthermore, the whey pre-load led to significantly increased postprandial iGLP-1 and tGLP-1 responses, predominantly during the early interval (first 30 min). These results are consistent with previous studies indicating that consumption of whey before a meal or with carbohydrates exerts insulinotropic effects and improves post-meal glycaemia in healthy individuals and in those with type 2 diabetes [6]. After the addition of whey, the postprandial glycaemia decreased by 28%, which is a larger reduction than that observed (18%) 180 min after different doses of nateglinide, a rapid-acting non-sulfonylurea insulin secretagogue [7], and higher than the reduction (12–24%) observed after a standardised meal and sulfonylurea therapy (glipizide and glibenclamide [known as glyburide in the USA and Canada]) [8]. The effects of whey preload, nateglinide and sulfonylureas were not compared in a head-to-head fashion. The increase in early insulin secretion with whey vs placebo was ~52%, which is comparable with the increase in the early insulin release after breakfast with the addition of 2 mg of repaglinide, a short-acting insulin secretagogue [9].

An important finding was the more rapid and higher early (30 min) iGLP-1 and tGLP-1 response along with enhanced and prolonged rise of both GLP-1 forms at the late interval (60–120 min) of the postprandial response after the whey protein pre-load. It has been suggested that amino acids and bioactive peptides generated during whey protein gastrointestinal digestion directly stimulate L cell activity to secrete GLP-1 and other incretin hormones [10]. The response of iGLP-1 after a meal pre-loaded with whey protein has not been explored previously in individuals with type 2 diabetes. The significantly higher ratio between iGLP-1 and tGLP-1 observed after whey protein may reflect reduced degradation of tGLP-1. An obvious suggestion for an explanation of this would be a lower DPP-4 activity after whey protein. We did not, however, detect any differences in DPP-4 plasma activity between placebo and whey groups. This would suggest that altered inactivation of GLP-1 by whey protein is not executed through changes in plasma DPP-4 activity. Instead, whey protein may serve as an endogenous inhibitor of DPP-4 in the gut, attenuating local GLP-1 degradation after its release from the enteroendocrine cells as previously suggested in animal studies [5].

A limitation of the study is that we did not examine the detailed mechanisms involved in the effect of the primary stimulus to enhance GLP-1 and insulin secretion, such as the contribution of changes in gastric emptying, meal absorption or the relative contribution of effects on GLP-1 vs insulin secretion, which need to be examined in further mechanistic studies. However, our findings suggest that whey protein may represent a novel approach for enhancing glucose-lowering strategies in type 2 diabetes.


This study was supported by the Israeli Ministry of Health and Milk Council (grant No. 3-00000-9118).

Duality of interest

The authors declare that there is no duality of interest associated with this manuscript.

Contribution statement

JW, ZL and DJ designed the study. JW, TG and DJ recruited the participants. DJ, JW, MBa and OF analysed the data. BA, DJ and OF wrote the manuscript. YB-D and TG collected the clinical information and analysed the blood samples. BA analysed the DPP4 activity. MBa and MBo performed the statistical analyses. All authors contributed to the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data and the drafting and editing of the manuscript. All of the authors approved the final version of the manuscript. DJ is the guarantor of this work.

Supplementary material

125_2014_3305_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (63 kb)
ESM Table 1(PDF 63.3 kb)
125_2014_3305_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (57 kb)
ESM Fig. 1(PDF 57.3 kb)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniela Jakubowicz
    • 1
  • Oren Froy
    • 2
  • Bo Ahrén
    • 3
  • Mona Boaz
    • 4
  • Zohar Landau
    • 1
  • Yosefa Bar-Dayan
    • 1
  • Tali Ganz
    • 1
  • Maayan Barnea
    • 2
  • Julio Wainstein
    • 1
  1. 1.Diabetes Unit, E. Wolfson Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of MedicineTel Aviv UniversityHolonIsrael
  2. 2.Institute of Biochemistry, Food Science and Nutrition, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and EnvironmentThe Hebrew University of JerusalemRehovotIsrael
  3. 3.Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of MedicineLund UniversityLundSweden
  4. 4.Epidemiology and Research Unit, E. Wolfson Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of MedicineTel Aviv UniversityHolonIsrael