Mortality after cancer among patients with diabetes mellitus: effect of diabetes duration and treatment
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Ranc, K., Jørgensen, M.E., Friis, S. et al. Diabetologia (2014) 57: 927. doi:10.1007/s00125-014-3186-z
- 2k Views
The prognostic role of different diabetes treatment types has not been studied in detail. We compared mortality rates among cancer patients with and without diabetes, accounting for diabetes treatment and diabetes duration.
This register-based study included all cancer patients diagnosed in Denmark during 1995–2009. The patients were classified into four groups according to diabetes status at the time of cancer diagnosis: no diabetes, diabetes without medication, diabetes with only oral hypoglycaemic agent (OHA) or diabetes with insulin treatment. Poisson models were used to examine the association between pre-existing diabetes in cancer patients and mortality relative to the non-diabetic cancer population.
Among 426,129 patients with incident cancer, we identified 42,205 patients with diabetes prior to cancer diagnosis. Overall, cancer patients with diabetes had higher mortality rates than non-diabetic cancer patients, highest among OHA- or insulin-treated patients. For all cancers combined and diabetes duration of 2 years at cancer diagnosis, insulin-treated patients experienced the highest mortality rate ratios starting from 3.7 (95% CI 2.7, 5.1) for men and 4.4 (3.1, 6.5) for women 1 year after cancer diagnosis, increasing to 5 (3.5, 7.0) for men and 6.5 (4.2, 9.3) for women 9 years after cancer diagnosis.
Our study provides strong evidence that cancer patients with pre-existing diabetes experience higher mortality than cancer patients without diabetes. The higher mortality seen among cancer patients treated with OHAs or insulin is in accordance with the existing evidence that more intensive diabetes treatment reflects a larger degree of comorbidity at the time of cancer diagnosis, and hence poorer survival.
KeywordsCancerDiabetes durationInsulinMortalityOral hypoglycaemic agentRegister studyType 2 diabetes
(Danish) Civil Registration System
Danish Cancer Registry
- DM + Ins
‘Diabetes and insulin’ category in analysis
- DM NoMed
‘Diabetes but no glucose-lowering medication history’ category in analysis
- DM + OHA
‘Diabetes and OHA’ category in analysis
Danish Prescription Registry
(Danish) National Diabetes Register
National Health Insurance Service Registry
- No DM
‘No diabetes’ category in analysis
National Patient Register
Oral hypoglycaemic agent
Standardised mortality ratio
The association between type 2 diabetes, cancer and mortality is a complex topic receiving increasing recognition . Strong evidence links type 2 diabetes and the risk of cancer occurrence [2–4]. This association differs for various cancer sites and in general is consistent among different studies.
A number of studies have reported that pre-existing diabetes influences the mortality of cancer patients, compared with cancer patients without diabetes [5, 6]. However, a potential association between diabetes treatment and incident cancer and mortality has been addressed only in few studies [4, 6, 7]. In particular, little is known about the specific role of different diabetes treatment types, and findings differ among different studies [8–10], including the link between diabetes duration and mortality of cancer patients relative to the non-diabetic cancer population.
We aimed to explore differences in survival among cancer patients with diabetes prior to cancer diagnosis compared with cancer patients without diabetes. A specific aim was to examine the association between different types of glucose-lowering therapies and survival after cancer diagnosis, as well as to examine how this association varies with duration of diabetes and by time since diagnosis of cancer.
Population and registries
The study was conducted among all Danish patients diagnosed with cancer between 1 January 1995 and 31 December 2009. Using the unique personal identification numbers assigned to each resident in Denmark, all individuals from our study population were linked to (1) the Danish Civil Registration System (CRS); (2) the National Diabetes Register (NDR); and (3) the Danish Cancer Registry (DCR).
The CRS has assigned an unique personal identification number (CPR number) to all Danish residents since 1968. The CRS keeps continuous updated records for date of death or emigration of each individual, which enables unambiguous linkage between Danish registers .
The NDR was established in 2006 by linking the information from (1) the National Patient Register (NPR), which contains all hospital additions since 1994; (2) the National Health Insurance Service Registry (NHISR), containing the information about all service provisions provided by general and specialist practitioners to patients in Denmark, starting in 1973; and (3) the Danish prescription registry (DPR), which holds information on all prescriptions dispensed at Danish pharmacies since 1995 [12, 13]. The inclusion date in the NDR was defined as the earliest of dates for hospital discharge with diabetes diagnosis (defined by ICD10: DE10-14, DH36.0, DO24, or ICD8 prior to 1999: 249, 250 www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/; http://www.wolfbane.com/icd/icd8.htm) in the NPR; podiatry treatment for diabetes patients; the fifth glucose measurement date in 1 year; the last measurement date of two blood glucose measurements per year in 5 consecutive years in NHISR; the date of second oral glucose-lowering drug purchase within 6 months; or date of the second purchase of prescribed insulin in the DPR. Before 1995 the records on diabetes diagnosis were considered unreliable, hence the date of diabetes diagnosis could not be reliably established for cancer patients until 1995.
The DCR was established in 1943, and contains details of incident cancers in Denmark [14, 15]. The DCR has been shown to have accurate and virtually compete registration of cancer cases. For the purpose of the study, we defined cancer diagnoses (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) as the first primary cancer to avoid misclassification or potential effect of the treatment for any previous cancers.
The date of cancer diagnosis was used as the inclusion date for all Danish cancer patients diagnosed from 1 January 1995 to 31 December 2009. In total, we identified 426,129 cancer patients who were followed until the date of death, emigration or the end of study follow-up (31 December 2009), whichever occurred first, providing a maximum follow-up of 15 years. The primary outcome of interest for this study was death, as recorded in the CRS.
The follow-up was classified by diabetes status at baseline in four groups: cancer patients without pre-existing diabetes (reference) (No DM; n = 383,924), patients with diabetes but no history of glucose-lowering medication (DM NoMed; n = 15,453), patients exclusively treated with oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHAs) (DM + OHA; n = 17,708), or patients on insulin (DM + Ins; n = 9,044).
Number of person-years and deaths of cancer patients by diabetes status and sex for all cancers combined and for the 25 most common cancer sites
DM + OHA
DM + Ins
All malignant neoplasms
Descending and sigmoid colon
Lung, bronchus and pleura
Melanoma of skin
Ovary, fallopian tube etc.
All study participants were classified by diabetes status at baseline, sex, date of birth, and age and calendar time at follow-up defined in 1 year Lexis classes [16, 17]. For diabetic patients diagnosed after 1995, we have included diabetes duration (time from diabetes diagnosis until cancer diagnosis).
The Cox proportional hazards model and the multiplicative Poisson model were used to examine the association between pre-existing diabetes in cancer patients and mortality, relative to non-diabetic cancer patients. The analysis was performed for cancer overall, separately for each sex and cancer site. The models were controlled for age, calendar time and diabetes status, all at the time of cancer diagnosis.
First, Cox models were fitted using time since cancer diagnosis as time-scale using only a fixed HR for each diabetes group compared with No DM.
To extend this idea, we modelled the rate ratios as a function of diabetes duration at cancer diagnosis, and as a function of time since cancer diagnosis relative to non-diabetic patients using Poisson models subdividing data into 1 month intervals during the first 6 months, 3 month intervals during 7–12 months of follow-up, and thereafter 1 year intervals since cancer diagnosis. The models included age at cancer diagnosis, calendar time at cancer diagnosis and smooth terms for interaction between diabetes duration and status, and interaction between diabetes status at entry and time since cancer diagnosis, using natural cubic splines with five and four knots, respectively. The left boundary knot in diabetes duration term was chosen to be 0 in order to ensure that people with duration 0 and non-diabetic people were modelled with 0 contribution from the duration term. This model showed: (1) how diabetes status affected mortality as a function of time since cancer diagnosis; and (2) the mortality of diabetic relative to non-diabetic patients as a function of diabetes duration at cancer diagnosis. All data management and statistical analyses were performed in R (http://www.r-project.org/) .
Median age of the population was 67 years among non-diabetic individuals (No DM), 73 years among both diabetic patients with no medication history or diabetic patients using OHAs (DM NoMed or DM + OHA) and 70 years among diabetic patients treated with insulin (DM + Ins). Median duration of diabetes at cancer diagnosis was 1.28, 1.74 and 1.65 years for the DM NoMed, DM + OHA and DM + Ins groups, respectively.
Statistically significant increases in mortality were observed among all three groups of diabetic patients for all cancers combined, and for colorectal, breast, ovary, cervix and corpus uteri, and bladder cancer. In addition, patients treated with insulin had a significant mortality increase for all previously mentioned cancers, as well as for rectum, lung and prostate cancer. For cancer overall, HRs were 1.10, 1.23 and 1.49 for men and 1.11, 1.22 and 1.46 for women in the DM NoMed, DM + OHA and DM + Ins groups, respectively. For colorectal cancer, the HRs were 1.10 for both male and female patients in the DM NoMed group, 1.17 and 1.22, for male and female patients respectively in the DM + OHA group, and 1.44 and 1.29, respectively, for the DM + Ins group. The corresponding HRs for breast cancer were 1.18, 1.42 and 1.68, and for prostate cancer were 1.05, 1.29 and 1.46, for the DM NoMed, DM + OHA and DM + Ins groups, respectively. Finally, HRs for lung cancer were 1.08 and 1.13 for OHA and insulin users, respectively.
Effect of diabetes duration and follow-up length
We extended the simple proportional hazards model in order to explore the effect of diabetes status on mortality risk following cancer diagnosis as a function of diabetes duration at cancer diagnosis and as a function of time since cancer, relative to non-diabetic cancer patients.
For the general Danish population (not subdivided by cancer status), we found that the standard mortality ratio (SMR) for diabetic vs non-diabetic patients was strongly dependent on age and duration of diabetes (See Fig. 5 in Carstensen et al ). Patients with 2 years of diabetes duration had a SMR ranging from 3 at age 50 years to 1.8 at age 70 years and 1.1 at age 80 years, with no difference between men and women.
As inclusion dates of diabetic cases before 1995 are not reliable, we analysed them as a special subgroup of diabetes patients disregarding specific duration of diabetes. This specific group of patients includes a combination of the three defined treatment subtypes and could therefore not be directly compared with specific diabetic groups with specific diabetes duration at cancer diagnosis. The group of insulin-treated patients diagnosed before 1995 was quite small, exhibiting rate ratios of 1.08 for men and 1.74 for women. The corresponding rate ratios were 1.42 and 1.54 for non-treated and 1.01 and 1.38 for OHA-treated diabetes patients.
Our study aimed to compare mortality among cancer patients with and without pre-existing diabetes, accounting for diabetes treatment type and diabetes duration. The results suggest that mortality of cancer patients with pre-existing diabetes is higher relative to non-diabetic patients for all cancers combined and for most individual cancer sites. In general, the highest mortality was found for OHA- or insulin-treated patients, suggesting that cancer patients with more intensive diabetes treatment have a larger degree of comorbidity at the time of cancer diagnosis, and hence poorer survival. Diabetes duration at cancer diagnosis did not influence the prognosis.
Further, we found a general increase in mortality over time since cancer diagnosis among diabetic patients relative to non-diabetic patients, which began 1 year after the cancer diagnosis. Mortality rates were higher with respect to more intensive treatment of diabetes, and highest for insulin-treated patients relative to non-diabetic patients.
Other studies investigating cancer survival related to diabetes status have also reported higher mortality related to treatment with insulin and sulfonylureas compared with metformin or no glucose-lowering treatment [5–10]. Several explanations for the observed association between pre-existing diabetes in cancer patients and increased all-cause mortality may be offered. The theoretical biological mechanism related to the increased mortality with insulin treatment relates to the hypothesis that hyperinsulinaemia brought about by exposure to insulin or by insulin resistance will accelerate the growth rate and thereby the progression of cancer. Furthermore, differences in cancer treatment between patients with and without diabetes may contribute to increased cancer-related mortality. Patients with diabetes often have other diabetes-related comorbid conditions, such as ischaemic heart disease, chronic kidney disease and neuropathy, that may influence clinical decisions .
In this context, van de Poll-Franse et al , in a Dutch study based on the Eindhoven Cancer Registry, found that diabetic patients with oesophageal, colon, breast or ovarian cancer were treated less aggressively than those without diabetes after controlling for age, cancer stage and sex. Further, patients with pre-existing diabetes may have poorer response to cancer treatment, including increased infection risk and intraoperative mortality. Finally, diabetic patients may on average present with more aggressive cancer at diagnosis than non-diabetic individuals, due either to masking of cancer symptoms because of symptoms related to diabetes or, theoretically, to an influence of diabetic therapy on the pre-diagnostic progression of the cancer. It is also possible that the excess mortality risk related to diabetes is independent of cancer and cancer treatment. Diabetes is a well-established risk factor for cardiovascular mortality in adults without cancer, and the microvascular and macrovascular damage associated with the disease is likely to induce disease and sometimes death regardless of cancer status. In our study, the excess mortality with diabetes was primarily seen for cancer types with long survival rates, such as breast, prostate and colorectal cancers, for which ‘competing’ cause of death is likely. This is in agreement with findings from other studies . On the other hand, for cancers with short survival times, such as pancreas, liver and lung cancers, mortality was less influenced by diabetes or treatment status. Surprisingly, however, mortality after pancreas and liver cancer was largely unaffected by diabetes status even though diabetes and glucose-lowering drugs are strongly related to risk of these cancers. Such findings support the notion that the observed association between glucose-lowering treatment, particularly insulin, and cancer, is a result of reverse causality or confounding by indication due to progressive hyperglycaemia, hepatic insulin resistance and beta cell dysfunction already present in the initial cancer stages .
The study was conducted using nationwide data covering the entire Danish population, and thus there was no selection bias with regard to entry into the study population. Further, the available information on diabetes duration and treatment type (i.e. DM NoMed, DM + OHA or DM + Ins) facilitated computation of precise estimates of diabetes effect on survival after cancer diagnosis. Finally, the comprehensive Danish registration system ensured that all emigrations and deaths in the study population were properly accounted for.
We had no useful information on stage of cancer at diagnosis or specific cancer therapy. For most cancer sites, e.g. the prostate, the completeness and validity of cancer staging is low , and the available information in hospital registers on specific cancer therapy was also incomplete and only available from 2002 . Hence, we were not able to explore whether differences in mortality were related to differences in severity of cancer disease at diagnosis or to differences in cancer treatment regimens. Information on medication use defined as redeemed prescriptions for OHAs or insulin did not include information on specific type or dosage.
Many factors influence the risk of both diabetes and cancer mortality, including comorbidities, obesity, insulin resistance, diet (including alcohol intake) and smoking history. The outcome of interest was death after cancer diagnosis; however, were not able to account for comorbidities or competing risks for death.
Cancer patients with pre-existing diabetes experienced elevated mortality rates compared with the non-diabetic cancer population. Mortality was highest when diabetes and cancer diagnoses occurred within 1 year and among OHA- and insulin-treated patients. For all cancers combined, diabetic patients receiving no glucose-lowering medications presented long-term mortality rate ratios of 1.55 for men and 1.77 for women. The corresponding rate ratios were 1.52 and 2.01 among diabetic patients on OHA treatment, and 5.05 and 6.54 among insulin-treated patients, for men and women, respectively.
Diabetic patients using OHAs or insulin had higher mortality rates following stomach, colorectal, kidney, or bladder cancers, or melanoma of the skin or multiple myeloma. Diabetic patients with breast, uterus or ovarian cancer experienced higher mortality if treated with OHAs and highest mortality if treated with insulin. Men with prostate cancer and pre-existing diabetes also presented increased mortality if treated with OHAs or insulin.
In conclusion, our study provides strong support for the notion that pre-existing diabetes increases mortality among cancer patients, and that the excess mortality is larger among patients with diabetes treated with OHAs or, particularly, insulin. Several potential explanations for the impaired prognosis of cancer patients who also suffer from diabetes can be offered, including increased comorbidity, delayed cancer diagnosis due to masking of cancer symptoms, interaction with cancer therapy, and perhaps a direct effect of glucose-lowering regimens inducing more progressive cancer at diagnosis and/or impaired prognosis. In any case, it is crucial that cancer patients with diabetes receive optimal diabetic treatment as well as any cancer-specific therapy; a therapeutic challenge typically demanding close collaboration between oncologists and endocrinologists.