Diabetologia

, Volume 56, Issue 1, pp 147–155

Ephedrine activates brown adipose tissue in lean but not obese humans

  • A. L. Carey
  • M. F. Formosa
  • B. Van Every
  • D. Bertovic
  • N. Eikelis
  • G. W. Lambert
  • V. Kalff
  • S. J. Duffy
  • M. H. Cherk
  • B. A. Kingwell
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00125-012-2748-1

Cite this article as:
Carey, A.L., Formosa, M.F., Van Every, B. et al. Diabetologia (2013) 56: 147. doi:10.1007/s00125-012-2748-1

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

Brown adipose tissue (BAT) activation increases energy consumption and may help in the treatment of obesity. Cold exposure is the main physiological stimulus for BAT thermogenesis and the sympathetic nervous system, which innervates BAT, is essential in this process. However, cold-induced BAT activation is impaired in obese humans. To explore the therapeutic potential of BAT, it is essential to determine whether pharmacological agents can activate BAT.

Methods

We aimed to determine whether BAT can be activated in lean and obese humans after acute administration of an orally bioavailable sympathomimetic. In a randomised, double-blinded, crossover trial, we administered 2.5 mg/kg of oral ephedrine to nine lean (BMI 22 ± 1 kg/m2) and nine obese (BMI 36 ± 1 kg/m2) young men. On a separate day, a placebo was administered to the same participants. BAT activity was assessed by measuring glucose uptake with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography–computed tomography imaging.

Results

BAT activity was increased by ephedrine compared with placebo in the lean, but unchanged in the obese, participants. The change in BAT activity after ephedrine compared with placebo was negatively correlated with various indices of body fatness.

Conclusions/interpretation

BAT can be activated via acute, oral administration of the sympathomimetic ephedrine in lean, but not in obese humans.

Keywords

Brown fat Cold Energy expenditure Ephedrine Noradrenaline (norepinephrine) Sympathomimetic Thermogenesis Type 2 diabetes Uncoupling protein White fat 

Abbreviations

BAT

Brown adipose tissue

FDG

[18F]fluorodeoxyglucose

mSv

Millisievert

PET–CT

Positron emission tomography–computerised tomography

SUV

Standardised uptake value

SUVmax

Maximum SUV

UCP-1

Uncoupling protein 1

WAT

White adipose tissue

Introduction

It is well established that brown adipose tissue (BAT) has a central role in facultative and adaptive thermogenesis in rodents throughout their lifespan [1]. More recently, BAT has been conclusively identified and shown to be functional in adult humans [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. BAT thermogenesis is underpinned by high energy consumption, suggesting that defective BAT may contribute causally to obesity and that BAT activation may have therapeutic potential for weight control [8, 9]. These possibilities have been substantiated by rodent studies demonstrating that BAT contributes ≥50% of total glucose and triacylglycerol clearance after gavage feeding [10, 11] and ∼50% of adrenergically stimulated energy consumption above basal levels [12] in wild-type mice housed at room temperature. Furthermore, after prolonged cold exposure, BAT, via adaptive thermogenesis, is directly responsible for more than doubling whole-body energy expenditure [13].

Studies in the 1970s and 1980s provided circumstantial, but inconclusive evidence for the presence of functional BAT in adult humans [14, 15]. More recently, using positron emission tomography–computerised tomography (PET–CT) imaging with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) tracer to measure tissue metabolic activity, it was found that an artefact infrequently observed in thoracic oncology scans was likely to be functional BAT [3, 16]. Subsequent studies using acute cold exposure interventions and/or identification of BAT molecular markers in supraclavicular fat, irrefutably confirmed this tissue to be functional BAT [2, 4, 5, 6, 7]. These and other studies also revealed that BAT is present in lean and obese adults, but that its volume and/or function, at least in response to cold, is reduced in obesity [4, 5, 17, 18].

With regard to the activation of BAT for weight control, a pharmacological approach has significant advantages over cold exposure, especially for long-term compliance. Repeated, prolonged cold exposure is impractical due to the associated discomfort and significant time commitment. Moreover, centrally derived signals that increase BAT activity and function in response to cold exposure are accompanied by increased appetite and food intake in an attempt to maintain energy balance [19]. An orally available pharmacological BAT activator devoid of appetite-stimulating effects could thus potentially help achieve sustainable weight loss.

In humans it is currently not known whether a pharmacological agent can activate BAT, as previous studies have used inconclusive experimental techniques [9, 20, 21] or observed no effect of drugs on BAT activity [22, 23]. Since BAT activation is mediated by sympathetic efferents predominantly via β-adrenergic receptors in BAT [1], sympathomimetic drugs represent a relevant drug class for investigation. In contrast to physiological BAT activation via cold exposure, ephedrine increases noradrenaline (norepinephrine) in post-synaptic peripheral nerve terminals and does not act centrally to stimulate food intake [24]. The aims of the present study were therefore to determine whether a single dose of ephedrine can activate BAT in adult humans and whether this mechanism is defective in obesity.

Methods

Participants

The participants in this study were nine lean and nine obese young men, who were otherwise healthy, unmedicated and physically inactive. The study was approved by the Alfred Hospital Ethics Committee. All patients provided written, informed consent.

Study design

This study was a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover trial, with 1 to 2 weeks wash-out between trials. Each participant was administered 2.5 mg/kg of the orally bioavailable sympathomimetic, ephedrine; an identical placebo was administered on a separate day. The study is registered with the Therapeutic Goods Administration of Australia (registration number 2010/0049) and ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number NCT01015794).

Since previous studies have indicated that BAT activity varies seasonally [4, 25], we conducted trials for each individual within a 14 day period to avoid confounding effects of intra-individual seasonal variation. The mean daily maximum temperature for the month prior to trials did not differ between groups (lean 20.5 ± 1.6°C; obese 20.6 ± 1.6°C [mean ± SEM]) and there were no differences between the maximum temperature on the day before (lean group: placebo 23.1 ± 2.1°C, ephedrine 19.4 ± 1.3°C; obese group: placebo 21.4 ± 2.1°C, ephedrine 20.2 ± 2.4°C) or the minimum temperature on the night before (lean group: placebo 13.0 ± 1.7°C, ephedrine 9.5 ± 1.5°C; obese group: placebo 11.2 ± 1.3°C, ephedrine 10.4 ± 1.8°C) trials within or between groups. There were no correlations between the BAT activity observed during the trial and any temperature variables collected. Temperature information was obtained from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology (www.bom.gov.au; last accessed 1 Mar 2012).

Dose rationale

We initially conducted (data not shown) studies in two participants (age 20 and 21 years, BMI 19.1 and 20.5 kg/m2) who met the recruitment criteria (below). They were administered 1 mg/kg ephedrine, based on previous studies that documented significant physiological adrenergic responses (blood pressure and heart rate) at this dose [20, 26]. No BAT activity was observed in these individuals despite changes in cardiovascular and metabolic responses being detected. Based on these pilot experiments, we hypothesised that BAT activation requires a greater ephedrine dose than other adrenergically responsive tissues. Subsequent experiments were thus conducted with an ephedrine dose of 2.5 mg/kg, as described hereafter. Our limited pilot data are consistent with other comprehensive studies that were published during the preparation of this manuscript and clearly indicate that, in participants with cold-responsive BAT, a 1 mg/kg dose of ephedrine [22] or a dose of isoprenaline that induces similar physiological responses [23] is not sufficient to activate BAT.

Screening

Screening involved clinical examination by a physician and measurement of physical characteristics (height, weight, WHR, brachial blood pressure, 12-lead ECG). A fasting blood sample was drawn for measurement of lipid profile, insulin, noradrenaline, HbA1c and glucose. An OGTT (75 g glucose) was then performed. Body composition was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Participants were then randomly assigned to receive ephedrine or placebo on the first experimental day, followed 1 to 2 weeks later by the alternative intervention.

Experimental protocol

Participants were given a standardised meal to consume the evening (between 18:00 and 22:00 hours) before attending the laboratory on both experimental days. The laboratory temperature was 20 to 22°C throughout all experiments. Upon arriving (07:30–08:30 hours), having fasted overnight and abstained from exercise, caffeine, smoking and alcohol during the 2 previous days, participants voided and changed into hospital scrubs and socks. They swallowed a telemetric pill for continuous recording of core body temperature (Coretemp HQInc, Palmetto, FL, USA) and an indwelling venous cannula was inserted into an antecubital vein. Oscillometric brachial blood pressure (Suresigns VS3; Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA, USA) was measured every 15 min and heart rate (Coretemp) continuously recorded. Participants rested in a supine position for 2 h, while covered with two blankets to ensure a thermoneutral state.

After the rest period, a blood sample was taken and participants took either lactose (placebo) or 2.5 mg/kg ephedrine hydrochloride (ephedrine) in a gelatine capsule with 150 ml of water. Blood samples were taken 15, 30, 60 and 90 min after drug ingestion for subsequent analyses (described below). At 60 min after drug ingestion, participants were injected with an FDG tracer to enable assessment of BAT glucose uptake via PET–CT. Energy expenditure was measured via indirect calorimetry (both described subsequently) from ∼60 to 90 min after drug ingestion, the time predicted to correspond to peak plasma noradrenaline concentrations and BAT activity [20].

PET–CT imaging

Between 60 and 70 min after drug or placebo ingestion, participants were injected with the FDG tracer. Approximately 60 min later, PET–CT scanning was performed to measure FDG uptake. Tracer uptake time was matched between trials for each participant. The CT scan is used for attenuation correction of PET images and to identify relevant adipose tissue regions for the assessment of FDG uptake. To minimise the radiation dose, we modified a standard PET–CT protocol commonly used for tumour detection. Weight-adjusted FDG (Cyclotek, Bundoora, VIC, Australia) was administered on the basis of an activity of 2.5 MBq/kg up to a maximum of 185 MBq with activity within ±10% between scans. PET acquisition time was 6 min per bed position. Variables used for low-dose CT acquisition were: 140 kVp (x-ray tube voltage), 20 mA, 1 s rotation, 10 mm collimation width, 1.0 pitch and 37 cm scan length (from chin to diaphragm). Modified PET and CT variables resulted in an effective radiation dose of 4.9 millisievert (mSv) per scan and have no bearing on subsequent standardised uptake value (SUV) calculations. The maximum radiation dose administered to participants was 10 mSv, which is the upper radiation limit permissible for healthy individuals over a 5 year period according to the Australian Code of Practice for Radiation in Research. PET–CT scans were acquired and reconstructed using a dual PET–CT scanner (Philips Gemini; Philips). Scans were analysed using 4 mm thick coronal slices (Extended Brilliance Workstation; Philips).

Analysis focused on the supraclavicular and cervical adipose tissue depots, as these areas have been consistently shown in numerous previous studies to demonstrate activity and/or molecular markers of BAT in humans [2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31]. We used two criteria to identify active BAT. First, CT radiodensity had to be in the established range of −180 to −10 Hounsfield units for all adipose tissue analyses [22, 23, 32]. Second, we used a BAT-specific threshold to quantify tissue FDG uptake on PET scans by the SUV method. The SUV is the ratio of tissue radioactivity concentration and the injected activity divided by body weight, and is a semi-quantitative measure of tissue FDG uptake [33, 34].

We first quantified maximum SUV (SUVmax) after placebo and ephedrine treatments in supraclavicular and cervical adipose, subcutaneous adipose (upper arm) and skeletal muscle (lateral deltoid) tissue.

Second, we determined a threshold for SUV to define active BAT within regions corresponding to adipose tissue on CT (Hounsfield units −180 to −10). The supraclavicular and cervical adipose depots have recently been described as ‘beige’ adipose [31], i.e. tissue that may macroscopically resemble white adipose tissue (WAT), but has the capacity to develop some of the functional attributes of BAT in terms of metabolic activity. Thus, any tissue in this region demonstrating FDG uptake above that of WAT should be considered to be beige/brown fat in various stages of adaptation [31, 35]. SUVmax in subcutaneous WAT in the upper arm in all participants and under both trial conditions was ≤0.6 g/ml (0.4 ± 0.01; mean ± SEM). On this basis we applied an SUV threshold for quantification of BAT volume/activity of ≥1.0 g/ml; while this might be considered low, it is consistent with previous studies reporting increased activity in BAT in this region [30, 36, 37]. Moreover, the preliminary analysis described above established that there was no overlap with WAT [36, 37]. For this analysis we are also confident that this method did not include skeletal muscle, first because of the radiodensity criteria (−180 to −10 Hounsfield units) and second because skeletal muscle SUVmax was ≤0.8 g/ml.

For each region of interest that met the CT and the PET criteria we multiplied the total volume (ml) and the average SUV (mean SUV), then summed values for each region, which enabled the calculation of ‘BAT activity’ in the supraclavicular and cervical regions [22].

Indirect calorimetry

Energy expenditure was measured with a metabolic measurement system (TrueOne 2400; ParvoMedics, East Sandy, UT, USA) using gas dilution with a ventilated hood. Mixed expired gases were measured after 10 min equilibration. Energy expenditure was calculated as an average over 30 min.

Biochemical analyses

Venous blood samples taken during screening and/or trials were centrifuged and plasma immediately frozen. Plasma was analysed for glucose, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, triacylglycerol (enzymatic methods, automated analyser), insulin (chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay) and HbA1c (boronate-affinity HPLC) (all conducted according to clinical diagnostic standards by Alfred Hospital Pathology). Plasma NEFA were measured using a commercially available kit (Waco Diagnostics, Richmond, VA, USA). Plasma noradrenaline was extracted using alumina adsorption, separated by high-performance liquid chromatography and detected electrochemically as described [38].

Statistical analyses

Physical characteristics were compared using unpaired two-tailed Student's t tests. The response, in haemodynamics, temperature and circulating factors, to the interventions was assessed as the mean of measurements made at 60 to 90 min after ephedrine or placebo ingestion [20].

Repeated measures (treatment) ANOVA with group (lean/obese) and treatment order as between-subject factors was used to examine the effect of treatment (ephedrine, placebo). There were no significant effects of treatment order for any variable. Since PET–CT data were not normally distributed, non-parametric Wilcoxon's signed-rank tests were used. Regression analyses were performed using Pearson's correlation co-efficient. Analyses were conducted using SPSS (version 15; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and Microsoft Excel (version 2007). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM and were considered significant at p < 0.05.

Results

Baseline participant characteristics are presented in Table 1. Groups were matched for age and height, but the obese group had significantly higher BMI, WHR, and absolute and relative body fat mass than lean participants. Lean tissue mass was also slightly higher in the obese than in the lean group, but was significantly lower as a percentage of body mass. Both groups were normotensive and had similar blood pressure, heart rate and circulating noradrenaline. Fasting glucose and HbA1c were in the normal range and not different between groups. The fasting insulin concentration was significantly higher in the obese than in the lean group, as were glucose concentrations at 60 and 120 min of the OGTT. Compared with lean participants, total and LDL-cholesterol, triacylglycerol and NEFA were higher in the obese group. HDL-cholesterol was lower in the latter.
Table 1

Participant characteristics

Variable

Lean

Obese

p values

n

9

9

 

Physical characteristics

  Age (years)

25 ± 1

27 ± 1

0.22

  Height (cm)

176 ± 3

178 ± 2

0.50

  Weight (kg)

68 ± 2

115 ± 5

<0.001

  BMI (kg/m2)

22 ± 1

36 ± 1

<0.001

  Body fat (%)

17 ± 2

44 ± 2

<0.001

  Body fat (kg)

11 ± 1

49 ± 4

<0.001

  Body lean tissue (kg)

54 ± 2

61 ± 2

0.048

  Body lean tissue (%)

82 ± 2

56 ± 2

<0.001

  WHR

0.83 ± 0.01

0.93 ± 0.02

<0.001

Cardiovasculara

  Systolic BP (mmHg)

114 ± 3

119 ± 2

0.22

  Diastolic BP (mmHg)

72 ± 2

71 ± 2

0.84

  Heart rate (bpm)

64 ± 2

69 ± 3

0.18

Hormones, metabolites, lipidsb

  Noradrenaline (pmol/l)

1036 ± 135

1173 ± 208

0.59

  Insulin (pmol/l)

36 ± 7

88 ± 14

0.01

  Glucose (mmol/l)

5.0 ± 0.1

5.1 ± 0.2

0.60

  HbA1c (%)

5.5 ± 0.1

5.5 ± 0.1

0.92

  HbA1c (mmol/mol)

36.6 ± 0.9

36.7 ± 0.9

0.92

  Total cholesterol (mmol/l)

4.2 ± 0.2

4.7 ± 0.2

0.04

  HDL-cholesterol (mmol/l)

1.4 ± 0.1

1.0 ± 0.1

0.01

  LDL-cholesterol (mmol/l)

2.5 ± 0.2

3.1 ± 0.2

0.03

  Triacylglycerol (mmol/l)

0.7 ± 0.1

1.3 ± 0.2

0.01

  NEFA (μmol/l)

288 ± 26

398 ± 44

0.048

OGTT

  60 min glucose (mmol/l)

5.8 ± 0.4

7.5 ± 0.6

0.03

  120 min glucose (mmol/l)

4.5 ± 0.3

5.9 ± 0.4

0.01

Values are mean ± SEM

aResting values

bFasting circulating values

Ephedrine increased systolic blood pressure (p < 0.001) (Fig. 1a, b) and heart rate (p = 0.01) (Fig. 1e, f) by a similar magnitude in both groups. Diastolic blood pressure increased significantly in lean (p = 0.001), but not in obese participants (p < 0.05 for treatment × group interaction) (Fig. 1c, d). Ephedrine had no effect on core temperature in either group, with the change from baseline to the mean of data points between 60 and 90 min after treatments being as follows: lean group, placebo 0.03 ± 0.06°C, ephedrine 0.08 ± 0.06°C; obese group, placebo 0.02 ± 0.03°C, ephedrine 0.03 ± 0.13°C. Ephedrine increased energy expenditure by a similar magnitude in both groups (lean 18 ± 3%, obese 13 ± 2%; p < 0.001).
Fig. 1

(a) Time course of systolic BP (SBP), (c) diastolic BP (DBP) and (e) heart rate before and after treatment with a single dose of ephedrine (2.5 mg/kg) or placebo (lactose). White circles, lean placebo; black circles, obese placebo; white squares, lean ephedrine; black squares, obese ephedrine. (b) Changes (Δ) in SBP, (d) DBP and (f) heart rate (HR) from immediately prior (0 min) to ingestion of ephedrine (Eph) or placebo (Pla) to the mean of values taken between 60 and 90 min after ingestion of treatments. White bars, lean group; black bars, obese group. Lean group n = 9; obese group, n = 9; *p < 0.05 for treatment × group interaction; **p = 0.01 and ***p < 0.001 for main effect of treatment; p = 0.001 for greater effect of ephedrine than placebo in lean group

Ephedrine increased blood glucose (p < 0.001) (Fig. 2a, b) and plasma noradrenaline (p < 0.001) (Fig. 2c, d) similarly in both groups. The plasma NEFA concentration was unchanged with ephedrine in both groups (Fig. 2e, f).
Fig. 2

(a) Time course of blood glucose, (c) plasma noradrenaline (NA) and (e) plasma NEFA concentrations before and after treatment with a single dose of ephedrine (2.5 mg/kg) or placebo (lactose). White circles, lean placebo; black circles, obese placebo; white squares, lean ephedrine; black squares, obese ephedrine. (b) Changes (Δ) in blood glucose, (d) plasma NA and (f) plasma NEFA concentrations from immediately prior (0 min) to ingestion of ephedrine (Eph) or placebo (Pla) to the mean of values taken between 60 and 90 min after ingestion of treatments. White bars, lean group; black bars, obese group. Lean group, n = 9; obese group, n = 9; ***p < 0.001 for main effect of treatment

Ephedrine increased supraclavicular adipose SUVmax by 145 ± 48% in lean participants (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3a), but there was no change in the obese group (4.0 ± 8.3%). Similarly, BAT activity was undetectable after placebo treatment and increased to 27.1 ± 12.1 ml × g/ml after ephedrine treatment in lean participants (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3c), but there was no effect in the obese group (placebo 8.7 ± 6.3 ml × g/ml, ephedrine 8.8 ± 8.8 ml × g/ml). In lean participants treated with ephedrine, SUVmax was higher in seven of nine individuals, while BAT activity increased in six of nine individuals. Post-ephedrine PET images showing FDG uptake are shown in Fig. 3d. Subcutaneous WAT SUVmax was similar for all groups and conditions (Fig. 3b).
Fig. 3

(a) Supraclavicular–cervical and (b) subcutaneous adipose SUVmax, and (c) BAT activity measured after treatment with a single dose of ephedrine (2.5 mg/kg) (Eph) or placebo (lactose) (Pla). White bars, lean group; black bars, obese group. (d) Representative images of three-dimensional reconstructed images for each participant after ephedrine trials. Note, the last lean participant has dextrocardia. Lean group, n = 9; obese group, n = 9; *p < 0.05 for difference from placebo

While BAT activity was not present under placebo conditions in any of the lean participants, it was observed in two obese participants after placebo. However, there was no between-groups difference in supraclavicular adipose SUVmax or BAT activity in the placebo trials (Fig. 3a, c).

The change in BAT SUVmax and BAT activity after ephedrine compared with placebo was inversely correlated (p ≤ 0.05) with a number of indices of body fat content and size (Table 2). No other relationships were observed between BAT SUVmax or activity and other variables (e.g. energy expenditure, acute or prolonged environmental temperature prior to trials, circulating metabolites and hormones, lean body mass).
Table 2

Relationship between body fatness/size and BAT activity

Variable

Δ SUVmax r (p)

Δ BAT activity r (p)

BMI

−0.53 (0.024)

−0.47 (0.047)

% Body fat

−0.52 (0.027)

−0.46 (0.054)

Total body fat (kg)

−0.53 (0.023)

−0.47 (0.050)

Total body mass (kg)

−0.55 (0.019)

−0.48 (0.051)

Correlation coefficients (r) and p values (p) between the change (ephedrine–placebo) in SUVmax or BAT activity and variables as listed

Lean participants, n = 9; obese participants, n = 9

Discussion

We report for the first time that the sympathomimetic drug ephedrine activates BAT in the majority of lean, but not obese individuals. This observation provides proof-of-concept support for the notion that pharmacological activation of BAT in humans is possible. The failure of ephedrine to acutely activate BAT in obese individuals also raises the possibility of a causal relationship between inactive BAT and obesity, although it cannot be determined from our results whether defective BAT contributes to obesity or vice-versa.

BAT can be activatedpharmacologically in lean humans

Our aim was not to advocate ephedrine as a clinical intervention, but rather to use it to successfully demonstrate that pharmacological BAT activation is possible in humans. The principal mechanism of action of ephedrine is via displacement and release of noradrenaline from storage vesicles in presynaptic neurons, but it also has direct effects on peripheral adrenergic receptors [24]. In lean participants, circulating noradrenaline approximately doubled after ephedrine compared with placebo administration, which presumably resulted in much higher concentrations in target tissues. This was associated with a ∼2.5-fold increase in SUVmax and a significant increase in BAT activity.

The 2.5-fold increase in SUVmax after ephedrine treatment in the lean group was considerably smaller than the more than fourfold increases observed after acute cold treatments in similar lean cohorts [6, 22]. This is further demonstrated by the level of BAT activity in the present study (27 ml × g/ml after 2.5 mg/kg ephedrine), compared with that reported by Cypess et al after cold exposure (∼110 ml × g/ml) in a cohort of comparable participants [22]. A possible explanation for this difference in the effect of cold and ephedrine on BAT activity is the specificity of the stimulus. Cold exposure provides a sympathetic stimulus targeted to relevant adrenergic receptors within BAT, whereas systemic ephedrine administration is not targeted directly to BAT [39, 40]. Thus systemic ephedrine administration will not specifically raise noradrenaline in the region of BAT adrenergic receptors and it is likely that relatively high plasma noradrenaline would be required to activate BAT in humans. This concept is well supported by our pilot data (not shown) and a recent publication [22], which both demonstrate that a lower dose of ephedrine (1 mg/kg) than that used in our main study (2.5 mg/kg) does not activate BAT. It has also been recently shown that isoprenaline does not activate BAT [23]. Moreover, the increase in noradrenaline and systolic blood pressure in all three instances was similar, despite the differences in route of administration, including oral (our pilot data), intramuscular [22] or intravenous [23]. In contrast to the above, our higher dose of ephedrine (2.5 mg/kg) induced a greater change in systolic blood pressure (∼45 mmHg vs ∼25 mmHg in the three other experiments) and increased plasma noradrenaline by a similar amount to that achieved by cold exposure [22], while both activated BAT, albeit by differing magnitudes. This suggests that, with regard to systemic sympathomimetic activation of BAT, it is the increase in plasma noradrenaline concentration, rather than the route of administration that is important. Our data highlight the poor responsiveness of BAT to systemic adrenergic stimulation compared with that of the cardiovascular system, but nevertheless show that BAT does retain some capacity to be activated via this method.

In rodents, BAT activation and increased energy expenditure in response to cold and sympathomimetic drugs is of considerably greater magnitude than in humans. Furthermore, BAT activation occurs in all rodents in response to these stimuli, whereas many humans, particularly the obese, are unresponsive. In the present study, energy expenditure increased by 18% in lean participants after ephedrine. This is in agreement with previous human studies, where cold exposure, ephedrine ingestion and noradrenaline infusion increased energy expenditure by between 5 and 30% [5, 20, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45], with BAT contributing around 1 to 5% to the elevation of energy expenditure above basal levels during cold exposure [28, 46]. In contrast, acute cold exposure or noradrenaline injection increased energy expenditure in mice by 100% [13]. Moreover, chronic adaptive cold thermogenesis in mice increased noradrenaline-stimulated energy expenditure approximately by an additional 100% [13], whereas in humans the additional increase was only about 15% [42].

BAT activation in humans varies considerably after cold, both in terms of the proportion of responsive individuals and the magnitude of response. In previous studies, between 50 and 100% of young lean adult males showed some response to cold [4, 5, 6, 28, 29]. This is consistent with our observations for ephedrine treatment here. The variation in the proportion of individuals responsive to cold may be due to differences in cooling protocols or analytical techniques, including the criteria used to classify BAT as active. Similarly, drug delivery protocols and especially dose are likely to influence the proportion of individuals in whom BAT can be activated. It is not known whether stronger stimuli can lead to BAT activation in all healthy, young lean individuals.

We observed no correlation between change in BAT activity after ephedrine and the increase in energy expenditure [5, 34]. Unlike in rodents, the majority of sympathomimetic-induced increases in energy expenditure in humans can probably be explained by increases in metabolic activity in tissues other than BAT, with skeletal muscle likely to be the major contributor [20, 46]. While cold-induced BAT activity correlates with energy expenditure [5, 28, 29, 34], the lesser degree of BAT activation detected here suggests that ephedrine-induced BAT activity makes only a small contribution to energy expenditure, possibly less than the value of ∼1% reported recently after cold exposure [28]. The current finding that ephedrine induced similar increases in whole-body energy expenditure in lean and obese participants, despite BAT activation occurring only in the former, is consistent with this.

Sympathomimetic-induced BAT activity isimpaired in human obesity

No increase in BAT activity was seen in response to ephedrine in the obese group. This is consistent with cold exposure studies, where no or low proportions of obese individuals exhibited BAT activation [4, 5, 18]. Importantly, to establish dose equivalence in the lean and obese groups, ephedrine was delivered as a weight-adjusted dose and induced similar physiological responses in both groups (systolic blood pressure, plasma noradrenaline and blood glucose). It is not presently known whether: (1) the defect in BAT activation in obesity relates to a defect in one or a combination of factors, including adrenergic receptor signal transduction in brown adipocytes; or (2) abnormalities exist in relevant afferent or efferent neural pathways; or (3) BAT is completely absent in most obese individuals.

Therapeutic implications

We have established that it is possible to acutely activate BAT with ephedrine. From a therapeutic perspective, a pan-adrenergic agonist such as ephedrine is not sufficiently targeted for clinical use. An alternative approach could involve interventions to sensitise BAT (akin to adaptive thermogenesis) and thus improve its function. At present, it is not known whether human BAT can undergo adaptive thermogenesis as observed in rodents. Indeed, there is no clear evidence to indicate whether it is at all possible to increase adult BAT function, whether by chronic cold exposure, diet-induced adaptive thermogenesis or a pharmacological agent. Joy [42] and Astrup et al [26] demonstrated in humans that chronic cold and ephedrine ingestion, respectively, increased acute noradrenaline infusion-induced energy expenditure. Moreover, shivering decreases during cold exposure after ∼2 weeks [47] and cold-stimulated activity has been shown to vary seasonally [4]. However, it remains unknown whether all or a portion of these effects can be directly attributed to adaptive BAT thermogenesis [48].

A more experimental strategy for BAT therapeutics is the induction of brown/brown-like adipocytes within WAT [35, 49]. Indeed, a recently published study suggests that, in humans, BAT tissue may be ‘beige’ adipose tissue. This corresponds in mice to a type of fat that contains mixed cell types, thus consisting not of classical BAT cells, but of adipocytes that resemble white adipocytes histologically, yet have the capacity to induce uncoupling protein 1 (UCP-1) and function as BAT cells [31]. UCP-1 gene expression and protein content are important markers of a BAT-like transition in WAT. When the activity of UCP-1 is increased, cellular substrate oxidation is increased by uncoupling the transport of hydrogen ions from ATP resynthesis across the mitochondrial inner membrane. In rodent models, ectopic production of UCP-1 protein in WAT, rather than in typical BAT depots, may be more important in protecting from obesity [49]. In humans, the BAT depots identified by PET–CT are presumed to be of sufficient size to impact on basal energy expenditure, if maximally activated [6, 9]. However, given the relatively low BAT:WAT ratio in humans compared with rodents, and with evidence that beige adipocytes are present in humans [31], the possibility of inducing brown or brown-like adipocyte activity in WAT should be investigated.

Conclusions and perspectives

We have demonstrated for the first time that BAT can be activated in the majority of lean, but not in obese humans with a single dose of ephedrine, although the degree of activation is substantially lower than that observed for cold exposure. This finding is important with regard to the future development of therapeutics targeting obesity. BAT activation strategies could operate alone and in concert with conventional weight loss strategies to improve sustainability. For example, if BAT could be induced to chronically increase basal energy expenditure, this could partially offset the reduction of basal energy expenditure observed with conventional lifestyle-oriented weight loss approaches [50]. Regardless of whether defective BAT is a cause or consequence of obesity, it remains a potential therapeutic target in individuals with established obesity. From this angle, the most important question is whether BAT function can be enhanced in a specific manner, such that chronic stimulation could increase the basal metabolic rate.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the research participants for their time and interest in our study.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Heart and Medical Research Council of Australia, the Alan Williams Trust and the Operational Infrastructure Support (OIS) Scheme of the Victorian State Government.

Duality of interest

The authors declare that there is no duality of interest associated with this manuscript.

Contribution statement

ALC conceived the study, conducted research trials, data collection and analysis, and wrote the manuscript. MFF recruited and screened participants, conducted data collection and reviewed/edited the manuscript. BVE designed the PET scanning protocol, assisted research trials, conducted data analysis and reviewed/edited the manuscript. DB was involved in the conception of study design, conducted medical screening of participants and research trials, and reviewed/edited the manuscript. NE conducted data analyses, assisted with manuscript preparation and reviewed/edited the manuscript. GWL was involved in the conception of the study design and data analyses, and reviewed/edited the manuscript. VK was involved in the conception of the study design and the PET scanning protocol, and reviewed/edited the manuscript. SJD was involved in the conception of the study design, conducted medical screening of participants and research trials, and reviewed/edited the manuscript. MHC was involved in the conception of the study design, designed the PET scanning protocol, assisted with research trials and reviewed/edited the manuscript. BAK conceived and directed the study, conducted data analysis and wrote/edited the manuscript. All authors have approved this version of the manuscript.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. L. Carey
    • 1
  • M. F. Formosa
    • 1
  • B. Van Every
    • 3
  • D. Bertovic
    • 1
    • 4
  • N. Eikelis
    • 2
  • G. W. Lambert
    • 2
  • V. Kalff
    • 3
  • S. J. Duffy
    • 1
    • 4
  • M. H. Cherk
    • 3
  • B. A. Kingwell
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Metabolic and Vascular Physiology LaboratoryBaker IDI Heart and Diabetes InstituteMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Human Neurotransmitters LaboratoryBaker IDI Heart and Diabetes InstituteMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Nuclear MedicineAlfred HospitalMelbourneAustralia
  4. 4.Department of CardiologyAlfred HospitalMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations