Diabetologia

, Volume 50, Issue 11, pp 2374–2383

Selective increases of bifidobacteria in gut microflora improve high-fat-diet-induced diabetes in mice through a mechanism associated with endotoxaemia

Authors

    • Unit of Pharmacokinetics, Metabolism, Nutrition and ToxicologyUniversité catholique de Louvain
  • A. M. Neyrinck
    • Unit of Pharmacokinetics, Metabolism, Nutrition and ToxicologyUniversité catholique de Louvain
  • F. Fava
    • Food Microbial Sciences Unit, Department of Food BiosciencesThe University of Reading
  • C. Knauf
    • Rangueil Institute of Molecular Medicine, I2MR, IFR31
  • R. G. Burcelin
    • Rangueil Institute of Molecular Medicine, I2MR, IFR31
  • K. M. Tuohy
    • Food Microbial Sciences Unit, Department of Food BiosciencesThe University of Reading
  • G. R. Gibson
    • Food Microbial Sciences Unit, Department of Food BiosciencesThe University of Reading
    • Unit of Pharmacokinetics, Metabolism, Nutrition and ToxicologyUniversité catholique de Louvain
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00125-007-0791-0

Cite this article as:
Cani, P.D., Neyrinck, A.M., Fava, F. et al. Diabetologia (2007) 50: 2374. doi:10.1007/s00125-007-0791-0

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

Recent evidence suggests that a particular gut microbial community may favour occurrence of the metabolic diseases. Recently, we reported that high-fat (HF) feeding was associated with higher endotoxaemia and lower Bifidobacterium species (spp.) caecal content in mice. We therefore tested whether restoration of the quantity of caecal Bifidobacterium spp. could modulate metabolic endotoxaemia, the inflammatory tone and the development of diabetes.

Methods

Since bifidobacteria have been reported to reduce intestinal endotoxin levels and improve mucosal barrier function, we specifically increased the gut bifidobacterial content of HF-diet-fed mice through the use of a prebiotic (oligofructose [OFS]).

Results

Compared with normal chow-fed control mice, HF feeding significantly reduced intestinal Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria including levels of bifidobacteria, a dominant member of the intestinal microbiota, which is seen as physiologically positive. As expected, HF-OFS-fed mice had totally restored quantities of bifidobacteria. HF-feeding significantly increased endotoxaemia, which was normalised to control levels in HF-OFS-treated mice. Multiple-correlation analyses showed that endotoxaemia significantly and negatively correlated with Bifidobacterium spp., but no relationship was seen between endotoxaemia and any other bacterial group. Finally, in HF-OFS-treated-mice, Bifidobacterium spp. significantly and positively correlated with improved glucose tolerance, glucose-induced insulin secretion and normalised inflammatory tone (decreased endotoxaemia, plasma and adipose tissue proinflammatory cytokines).

Conclusions/interpretation

Together, these findings suggest that the gut microbiota contribute towards the pathophysiological regulation of endotoxaemia and set the tone of inflammation for occurrence of diabetes and/or obesity. Thus, it would be useful to develop specific strategies for modifying gut microbiota in favour of bifidobacteria to prevent the deleterious effect of HF-diet-induced metabolic diseases.

Keywords

BifidobacteriaDiabetesEndotoxinGLP-1Glucagon-like peptide-1Gut microfloraInflammationObesityPrebiotics

Abbreviations

HF

high-fat

HF-Cell

high-fat cellulose

HF-OFS

high-fat oligofructose

LPS

lipopolysaccharide

MIB

mouse intestinal bacteria

OFS

oligofructose

spp.

species

Introduction

Evidence suggests that obesity and metabolic disorders (type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance) are tightly linked to inflammation [1, 2]. Although obesity results from interactions between genetic and environmental factors, eating habits contributing to an increase in fat intake can promote metabolic diseases.

In models of diet-induced and genetic obesity, adipose tissue has increased production and content of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-α [3, 4].

Cytokines have been shown to cause insulin resistance [5, 6], which favours hyperinsulinaemia and excessive hepatic and adipose tissue lipid storage. However, while extensive research has been dedicated to the effects of inflammatory reactions on energy metabolism, the triggering factor linking inflammation to a high-fat (HF)-diet-induced metabolic syndrome remains to be determined.

An innovative hypothesis was recently proposed: the gut flora could be an important factor affecting energy disposal and could be implicated in metabolic disease associated with obesity [711]. One observation reported that young adult germ-free mice had 40% less body fat than their conventionalised counterparts on the same diet. Similarly, lean axenic mice colonised with microbiota from ob/ob mice increased body weight [7]. The authors suggested that gut microbiota from obese mice allowed energy to be salvaged from otherwise non-digestible dietary polysaccharides producing substantial elevations in serum glucose and insulin, both factors that trigger lipogenesis. However, this hypothesis of microbiota-induced lipogenesis did not explain the differential effect on body weight of a HF diet vs regular chow, since axenic mice fed a HF diet did not gain weight. This suggests that a bacterially related factor was responsible for HF-diet-induced obesity [9] and that lipids alone were not sufficient to promote obesity and inflammation.

The relationship between HF feeding and the development of a low-grade inflammatory tone is unclear, but may be related to the microbiota present in the digestive tract. With regard to the role of gut microbiota in the development of metabolic diseases, we recently reported [12] that HF feeding in mice induced a low-grade inflammatory tone and that metabolic disease was associated with reduced numbers of Bifidobacterium species (spp.) in caecal content and higher plasma endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide [LPS]) concentrations (defined as metabolic endotoxaemia). Hence, LPS appears to be a molecular link between HF feeding, microbiota and inflammation. LPS was identified as a novel factor triggering the onset of HF diet-induced obesity and type 2 diabetes [12]. We have also shown that mice lacking the major LPS co-receptor CD14 were resistant to HF-diet-induced inflammation and metabolic diseases [12]. Since bifidobacteria reduced intestinal endotoxin levels and improved mucosal barrier function [1315], we decided to specifically increase the gut bifidobacterial content of HF-diet-treated mice through prebiotic dietary fibre (oligofructose [OFS]), which can reproducibly modulate the gut microbiota typified by increased bifidobacteria [16].

We therefore tested the hypothesis that the pattern of bacterial changes occurring through dietary intervention with OFS may control the occurrence of metabolic diseases in mice fed a HF diet for 14 weeks.

Methods

Animals

Male C57bl6/J mice (12 weeks old; Charles River, Brussels, Belgium) were housed in a controlled environment (12 h daylight cycle, lights off at 18:00 hours) with free access to food and water. All mouse experiments were approved by the local ethics committee and housing conditions were as specified by the Belgian Law of 14 November 1993 on the protection of laboratory animals (agreement number LA 1230314). Mice were killed by cervical dislocation after a 5 h period of fasting. Caecum (full and empty) and adipose tissues (epididymal, subcutaneous and visceral) were precisely dissected, weighed, immersed in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C, for further analysis.

Diet and experimental groups

Mice (n = 8 per group) were fed four different experimental diets for 14 weeks as follows: (1) standard diet (control) (A04; UAR, Villemoisson-sur-Orge, France) [17]; (2) HF diet containing 49.5% fat (g/100 g of total dry diet) corresponding to 72% of the total energy content (UAR, Epinay-sur-Orge, France); (3) a mix of HF diet and a fermentable dietary fibre (OFS) (HF-OFS) (kind gift from Orafti, Tienen, Belgium) [18]; and (4) a mix of HF diet and a non-fermentable dietary fibre (microcrystalline cellulose [HF-Cell]) (Vivapur microcrystalline cellulose; J. Rettenmaier & Söhne, Weissenborn, Germany). Dietary fibre was added in a proportion of 90:10 (weight of HF diet:weight of fibre). Nutritional compositions of the experimental diets are provided in the Electronic supplementary material (ESM Table 1).

Glucose tolerance test

Oral glucose tolerance tests were performed after 13 weeks of treatment in mice that had been fasted for 6 h. Glucose was orally administered (3 g/kg body weight, 660 g/l glucose solution) and blood glucose determined through a glucose meter (Roche Diagnostics, Meylan, France) using 3.5 μl of blood collected from the tip of the tail vein before and at administration of glucose load (−30 and 0 min) and after glucose load (15, 30, 60, 90, 120 min). To assess plasma insulin concentration, 20 μl of blood was sampled 30 min before and 15 min following the glucose load.

Biochemical analyses

Plasma LPS determinations were performed using a kit based on a Limulus amoebocyte extract (LAL kit; Cambrex BioScience, Walkersville, MD, USA); samples were diluted 1:50 and heated for 10 min at 70°C. Plasma insulin concentration was determined in 5 μl of plasma using an ELISA kit (Mercodia, Uppsala, Sweden) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cytokines were determined in 12 μl of plasma using a kit (Bio-Plex Multiplex; Bio-Rad, Nazareth, Belgium) and measured using Luminex technology (Bio-Plex; Bio-Rad).

Microbial quantification in intestinal contents by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) analysis

Caecal contents collected post mortem from mice were stored at −70°C. Samples were thawed on ice and diluted 1:10 in sterile ice cold PBS (0.1 mol/l phosphate, pH 7.0) (0.1 mol/l phosphate, pH 7.0). The suspension was homogenised by pipetting and centrifuging at 3,500×g for 15 min to remove particulate matter. The supernatant fraction containing bacterial cells was fixed overnight in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde. The bacterial cells were then washed and re-suspended twice in sterile PBS and finally stored in 500 ml ethanol/l PBS at −20°C until hybridisation with appropriate molecular probes targeting specific regions of 16S rRNA. The probes used were: EREC 482 [19] for Eubacterium rectale–Clostridium coccoides group, Lab158 [20] for lactobacilli and enterococci and Bif164 [21] for Bifidobacterium spp. (Gram-positive bacteria); and Bac303 [22] for Bacteroides–Prevotella spp., MIB 661 [23] for Bacteroides mouse intestinal bacteria (MIB), SRB 687 [24] for sulphate-reducing bacteria and probe D [25] for Enterobacteriaceae spp. (Gram-negative bacteria) within the murine intestinal microflora. The nucleic acid stain DAPI was used for total bacterial counts. The DNA probes were tagged with the Cy3 fluorescence dye so that the hybridised samples could be examined using fluorescence microscopy. Results were expressed as Log10 (bacterial cells per g caecal content wet weight).

Real-time quantitative PCR

Total RNAs from white visceral adipose tissue were prepared using a reagent (TriPure; Roche, Basel, Switzerland) as described [26]. PCRs were performed using a sequence detection system instrument and software (AbiPrism 5700; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) as described [26]. Primer sequences for the targeted mouse genes are available upon request (patrice.cani@uclouvain.be).

Statistical analysis

Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance of differences was analysed by one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc (Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test). Correlations between parameters where assessed by Pearson’s correlation test, using GraphPad Prism version 4.00 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). A value of p < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

Results

Specific increase of bifidobacteria by prebiotics

The maintenance of mice on a HF diet resulted in a significant modulation of population levels of the dominant members of the intestinal microbiota as compared with control diet (Fig. 1). The major modifications observed were a dramatic reduction in quantities of bifidobacteria in HF-fed mice compared with control and the Gram-negative Bacteroides MIB, as previously described [12]. To determine the metabolic role of bifidobacteria following HF-diet feeding, we took advantage of the prebiotic model, known to specifically increase gut bifidobacterial contents. For 14 weeks mice were fed a HF diet enriched or not with prebiotic non-digestible carbohydrate (OFS) (HF-OFS) or non-prebiotic non-digestible carbohydrate (HF-Cell) as negative control. Importantly, quantities of bifidobacteria in HF-OFS fed mice were restored and even higher than those of control mice (Fig. 1a), confirming the role of OFS as a prebiotic. Numbers of the newly recognised Gram-negative operating taxonomic unit, MIB, which reside within the Cytophaga–Flavobacter–Bacteroides phylum (referred to here as Bacteroides MIB), were markedly reduced in all HF-diet-treated mice. These bacteria are closely related to the Bacteroides–Prevotella group, but not quantified by the probe Bac303. Together with the E. rectale–C. coccoides group, they constitute the dominant members of the mouse intestinal microbiota [23]. Numbers of the E. rectale–C. coccoides group were also significantly lower in animals fed the HF diet compared with control and even more so in HF-Cell mice (Fig. 1).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00125-007-0791-0/MediaObjects/125_2007_791_Fig1_HTML.gif
Fig. 1

Modulation of gut bacteria by dietary treatments. Caecal bacterial content of aBifidobacterium spp., bEubacterium rectaleClostridium coccoides group, c lactobacilli–enterococci, dBacteroides spp., eEnterobacteriaceae, fBacteroides MIB, g sulphate-reducing bacteria and h total bacteria. Bacterial quantities are expressed as Log10 (bacterial cells/g caecal content wet weight). Data are mean ± SE. Data with different superscript letters are significantly different p< 0.05, according to the post hoc ANOVA statistical analysis. CT Control diet, HF high-fat diet, HF-Cell high-fat diet and non-fermentable dietary fibre, HF-OFS high-fat diet and fermentable dietary fibre

Prebiotics lower endotoxaemia

We observed that HF and HF-Cell mice showed a significant increase of endotoxaemia whereas HF-OFS normalised to control values (Table 1). This suggests that the increase in bifidobacteria by prebiotics protected against endotoxaemia induced by a HF diet.
Table 1

Body weight, plasma, adipose tissue inflammatory markers and GLP-1 precursor mRNA

Parameters

CT

HF

HF-Cell

HF-OFS

Body weight gain (g)

4.82 ± 0.52a

11.56 ± 1.34b

8.03 ± 0.52c

7.74 ± 0.57c

Daily energy intake (kJ/mouse)

37.82 ± 2.46a

79.04 ± 6.22b

64.03 ± 1.29b,*

61.02 ± 1.21b,*

Adipose tissue weight (g/100 g body weight)

 Visceral

0.59 ± 0.05a

1.16 ± 0.11b

0.89 ± 0.03a

0.90 ± 0.05a

 Epididymal

1.38 ± 0.1a

4.74 ± 0.54b

3.21 ± 0.26c

3.16 ± 0.22c

 Subcutaneous

1.42 ± 0.08a

5.28 ± 0.65b

3.85 ± 0.47c

3.18 ± 0.14c

 Plasma endotoxin (EU/ml)

5.02 ± 0.56a

9.03 ± 1.25b

11.28 ± 3.52b

6.16 ± 0.47a

Visceral adipose tissue mRNA (AU)

 Il-1

3.59 ± 0.68a

5.54 ± 2.24a

5.88 ± 1.57a

2.33 ± 0.69a,**

 Pai-1

3.98 ± 0.83a

17.44 ± 3.74b

65.89 ± 25.79c

11.58 ± 4.92a,b

 Tnf

2.88 ± 0.63a

4.63 ± 1.67a

4.40 ± 1.21a

1.97 ± 0.67a

 Colon proglucagon mRNA (AU)

1.49 ± 0.55a

1.87 ± 0.43a

2.78 ± 0.20a

6.96 ± 0.95b

Data are mean ± SEM

AU Arbitrary units

*p = 0.1 vs HF

**p = 0.06 vs HF-Cell

a,b,cData with different superscript letters are significantly different p < 0.05, according to the post hoc ANOVA statistical analysis.

CT Control diet, HF high-fat diet, HF-Cell high-fat diet and non-fermentable dietary fibre, HF-OFS high-fat diet and fermentable dietary fibre

Gram-positive Bifidobacterium spp. negatively correlated with endotoxaemia

To identify whether one specific group of gut bacteria was involved in the determination of endotoxaemia, we performed multiple correlations analyses between the major Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria present in the caecal contents of mice (Fig. 2). Endotoxaemia significantly and negatively correlated with Bifidobacterium spp. (Fig. 2a), but no relationship was seen between endotoxaemia and any other bacterial group (Fig. 2). Since we found that prebiotic fed mice only exhibited higher gut bifidobacteria and normalised endotoxaemia, we studied the putative causative link between such parameters and metabolic disorders in these mice.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00125-007-0791-0/MediaObjects/125_2007_791_Fig2_HTML.gif
Fig. 2

Gram-positive Bifidobacterium spp. negatively correlates with endotoxaemia. Correlations between groups of bacteria present in the caecal content of mice. Main Gram-positive gut bacteria: aBifidobacterium spp., b lactobacilli–enterococci, cEubacterium rectaleClostridium coccoides group. Main Gram-negative gut bacteria: dBacteroides spp., eEnterobacteriaceae, f sulphate-reducing bacteria. Bacterial quantities and plasma endotoxin levels are expressed as indicated. Pearson’s r correlations: r = −0.41, p = 0.025 (a); r = −0.06, p = 0.79 (b); r = −0.03, p = 0.81 (c); r = −0.18, p = 0.3 (d); r = −0.12, p = 0.51 (e); r = 0.21, p = 0.28 (f)

Prebiotics improve glucose tolerance and restore glucose-induced insulin secretion

HF mice showed strong glucose intolerance, as shown by glucose excursion and AUC data (Fig. 3a,b). HF-OFS improved glucose tolerance compared with HF and HF-Cell mice (Fig. 3a,b). Fasted insulinaemia was significantly increased in HF and HF-Cell mice compared with control (Fig. 3c) and insulin secretion following glucose load was almost absent in HF and HF-Cell mice (Fig. 3c,d). In contrast, HF-OFS mice showed normal fasting plasma insulin levels and restored glucose-induced insulin secretion (Fig. 3c,d). Moreover, fasted insulin and glycaemic response were positively correlated with plasma endotoxin levels (Fig. 4a,b) and negatively correlated with bifidobacteria (Fig. 4c,d). This set of data suggests that the specific increase of bifidobacteria and subsequent lower level of endotoxaemia measured in HF-OFS mice impacted on glucose homeostasis.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00125-007-0791-0/MediaObjects/125_2007_791_Fig3_HTML.gif
Fig. 3

Prebiotics improve glucose tolerance and glucose-induced insulin secretion. a Plasma glucose (mmol/l) following an oral glucose load (3 g/kg) in control mice fed a normal chow diet (closed squares) or in mice fed an HF diet (closed circles) or an HF-OFS diet (open circles) or an HF-Cell diet (open squares) for 14 weeks. b AUCs in the same groups. c Plasma insulin concentrations 30 min before (−30) and 15 min after (15) an oral glucose load in control mice fed a normal chow diet (open bars) or in mice on HF diet (closed bars) or on an HF-Cell diet (hatched bars) or an HF-OFS diet (grey bars) for 14 weeks. d Δ Insulin between 30 min before and 15 min after an oral glucose load. Data are mean ± SE. Data with different superscript letters are significantly different p < 0.05, according to the post hoc ANOVA statistical analysis. CT Control diet, HF high-fat diet, HF-Cell high-fat diet and non-fermentable dietary fibre, HF-OFS high-fat diet and fermentable dietary fibre

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00125-007-0791-0/MediaObjects/125_2007_791_Fig4_HTML.gif
Fig. 4

Glucose tolerance and fasted plasma insulin correlate positively with endotoxaemia and negatively with Bifidobacterium spp. Correlation between endotoxaemia and a glycaemic response to glucose load (AUC) or b fasted insulin. c Correlation between Bifidobacterium spp. and glycaemic response to glucose load (AUC) or d fasted insulin. Pearson’s r correlations: r = 0.36, p = 0.05 (a); r = 0.41, p = 0.027 (b); r = −0.51, p = 0.005 (c); r = −0.46, p = 0.011 (d)

Prebiotic supplementation improves body weight gain and energy intake, reduces fat mass development and increases colonic glucagon-like peptide-1 precursor

HF diet increased total body weight gain and fat mass by 2.5-fold and 3- to 4-fold, respectively, compared with the standard diet. HF-OFS and HF-Cell-fed mice had reduced energy intake compared with HF (Table 1). In addition, treated mice showed significantly reduced body weight gain and fat mass development compared with HF. Nevertheless, HF-OFS fed mice had 20% lower subcutaneous adipose tissue than HF-Cell counterparts (Table 1). Here again we found that body weight and visceral fat mass correlated positively with plasma endotoxin levels (Fig. 5a,b) and negatively with bifidobacteria (Fig. 5c,d). We have previously described how OFS feeding promotes endogenous glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) production (i.e. colonic proglucagon mRNA) [17, 18, 2729]. We therefore measured colonic proglucagon mRNA in the present study. HF-OFS fed mice exhibited a strong increase of proglucagon mRNA precursor (by about 4.6-, 3.7- and 2.5-fold, compared with control, HF and HF-Cell respectively) (Table 1).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00125-007-0791-0/MediaObjects/125_2007_791_Fig5_HTML.gif
Fig. 5

Body weight and fat mass correlate positively with endotoxaemia and negatively with Bifidobacterium spp. Correlations between endotoxaemia and a body weight or b adipose fat mass. c Correlations between Bifidobacterium spp. and body weight or d adipose fat mass. Pearson’s r correlations: r = 0.61, p = 0.005 (a); r = 0.39, p = 0.03 (b); r = −0.61, p = 0.0003 (c); r = −0.46, p = 0.01 (d)

Prebiotics control high-fat-diet-induced inflammation

Since we observed higher endotoxaemia in HF-fed and HF-Cell-fed mice, we measured plasma IL-1α, IL-1β and IL-6. It was seen that IL-1α, IL-1β and IL-6 were increased in HF mice compared with control (Fig. 6). HF-OFS had significantly normalised IL-1α and IL-6 cytokines plasma levels compared with HF and tended to have decreased IL-1β, with HF-Cell mice showing intermediary levels. The adipose tissue mRNA concentrations of Il-1 (also known as Il1), TNF-α (also known as Tnf) and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (Pai-1, also known as Serpine1) were increased in HF and HF-Cell-fed mice, whereas this increase was blunted in HF-OFS fed mice (Table 1). These last results demonstrate that the lower fat mass and body weight observed in HF-Cell mice is not a prerequisite for reduction of the inflammatory tone as measured in the plasma and adipose tissue of HF-OFS fed mice.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00125-007-0791-0/MediaObjects/125_2007_791_Fig6_HTML.gif
Fig. 6

Prebiotics lower plasma pro-inflammatory cytokines. Plasma cytokine concentrations (pg/ml) in mice fed normal chow diet (open bars), HF diet (closed bars), HF-Cell diet (hatched bars) or HF-OFS diet (grey bars) for 14 weeks. Data are mean ± SE. Data with different superscript letters are significantly different p < 0.05, according to the post hoc ANOVA statistical analysis

Here, too, we found that plasma cytokines were positively correlated with plasma endotoxin levels (Fig. 7a–c) and negatively correlated with bifidobacteria (Fig. 7d–f).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00125-007-0791-0/MediaObjects/125_2007_791_Fig7_HTML.gif
Fig. 7

Plasma markers of inflammation correlate positively with endotoxaemia and negatively with Bifidobacterium spp. Correlations between endotoxaemia and a IL-6, b IL-1β and c IL-1α. d Correlations between Bifidobacterium spp. and IL-6, e IL-1β and f IL-1α. Pearson’s r correlations: r = 0.3, p = 0.16 (a); r = 0.21, p = 0.87 (b); r = 0.45, p = 0.041 (c); r = −0.45, p = 0.025 (d); r = −0.28, p = 0.212 (e); r = −0.65, p = 0.0008 (f)

Discussion

Recent studies have highlighted key mammalian host–gut microbial relationships, suggesting that the gut microbiota play an important role in energy metabolism [7]. Moreover, our recent studies have demonstrated that HF diet-fed mice developed insulin resistance and inflammation by a mechanism directly dependent on a gut bacterial Gram-negative derived compound, namely LPS [12]. Here we report that HF feeding alters the intestinal microbiota composition: quantities of the dominant Gram-positive groups Bifidobacterium spp. and E. rectale–C. coccoides group were reduced, as were the numbers of the numerically dominant murine Gram-negative group, Bacteroides MIB, compared with controls fed a standard diet. Moreover, we found that among the different gut bacteria analysed, plasma LPS concentrations correlated negatively with Bifidobacterium spp. Since, bifidobacteria have been shown to reduce intestinal endotoxin levels and improve mucosal barrier function [1315], we decided to specifically increase the gut bifidobacterial content of HF-diet-treated mice through supplementation with prebiotic dietary fibre (OFS). Mice fed the prebiotic dietary fibre had normal endotoxaemia. This observation strongly correlated with improved glucose tolerance as explained by the normalisation of glucose-induced insulin secretion. Although glucose-induced insulin secretion was normalised in HF-OFS mice, glucose tolerance following a glucose load was improved, but did not reach control values. This suggests that OFS-fed mice remained insulin resistant. According to these results, we have previously shown that HF-diet-induced hepatic insulin resistance was normalised in OFS fed mice, without significant improvement in whole-body insulin sensitivity [18]. Moreover, the improved hepatic insulin sensitivity observed in HF-OFS fed mice was strongly associated with a significantly lower hepatic inflammatory tone [18].

Since we observed higher endotoxaemia in HF-diet-fed mice, we measured plasma and adipose tissue inflammatory markers. We found that HF-diet feeding increased plasma IL-1α, IL-1β and IL-6 concentrations, but this increase was prevented only in prebiotic treated mice. It seems that bifidobacteria and endotoxaemia are therefore linked to metabolic disorders. In line with our results, Brun et al. have recently demonstrated that obese and diabetic mice (ob/ob and db/db) exhibited significantly higher plasma endotoxin levels, which correlated to higher plasma inflammatory markers [30]. Multiple Pearson’s correlations analysis of our data revealed that endotoxaemia positively correlated with glucose intolerance, fasted insulinaemia, inflammatory markers, adipose tissue and body weight gain, while bifidobacteria negatively correlated with these parameters. Collectively, our data indicate that HF-diet-induced metabolic disorders could be modulated through a number of related aspects.

We have shown that increased endotoxaemia observed during HF feeding could be one outcome of the modulation of gut microbiota. Moreover, we cannot exclude that intestinal mucosa permeability could be increased following HF feeding and restored through prebiotic treatment. The exact mechanism by which prebiotic fibre lowers endotoxaemia and systemic inflammatory tone is poorly understood. It is recognised that bifidobacteria are the main gut bacteria involved in the positive effects observed after prebiotic supplementation. Indeed, bifidobacterial supplementation has been associated with lower bacterial translocation and endotoxaemia, leading to a decrease of the inflammatory cascade activation in several models of gut bacteria translocation [1315, 31]. Similarly, other studies have reported that probiotics and gut microbiota modulation through prebiotic ingestion may improve or prevent disruption of intestinal epithelial barrier function and consequently reduce intestinal permeability in rodents and humans [32, 33]. Other studies strongly suggest that the products of OFS fermentation such as short-chain fatty acids (butyrate, propionate and lactate) positively influence the gut barrier function [34], i.e. in vitro butyrate, acetate and propionate all exert a concentration-dependent reduction of paracellular permeability in the Caco-2 model of colonic epithelium [35]. In the present study, we observed that HF-OFS-fed mice exhibit a significant increase in total and empty caecum weight compared with HF and HF-Cell mice (data not shown). This supports the idea that the fermentation of dietary fibre allowing the proliferation of specific bacteria such as bifidobacteria influences the profile of short-chain fatty acids released in the gut. The consequences of the specific fermentation are lower endotoxaemia and an improvement of metabolic disturbances.

With regard to the role of gut bacteria in the development of metabolic disorders, Brugman et al. have shown that antibiotic treatment partially protects against the occurrence of diabetes in a diabetes-prone rat that develops insulitis. The authors proposed that altering the gut microbiota composition by antibiotic treatment reduces the antigenic load and hence the inflammatory reaction that had led to pancreatic beta cell destruction [36]. Consistent with these results, we have recently demonstrated that HF-diet-fed mice and ob/ob mice treated with antibiotics for 4 weeks were partially protected against the development of metabolic diseases and inflammatory tone (P. D. Cani, N. M. Delzenne and R. Burcelin, unpublished data).

We cannot rule out the putative implication of another important mechanism to explain the improved glucose metabolism in prebiotic-fed mice. Indeed, we have previously reported that prebiotic dietary fibre improved diabetes and insulin sensitivity by a mechanism promoting synthesis and secretion of the incretin, GLP-1 [18, 28, 29]. Here, we confirmed that prebiotic dietary fibre only strongly increase colonic proglucagon mRNA content. Therefore, the present data suggest that there is a link between modulation of gut microbiota, endotoxaemia, inflammation and GLP-1 secretion. This merits further investigation. While the doses used in animal studies are not directly transposable to human nutrition, several reports have demonstrated that ingestion of fructo-oligosaccharides at the dose of 5 to 20 g/day are sufficient to promote prebiotic [3740] and physiological effects [4144].

In conclusion, dietary modulation of gut microbiota with a view to increasing bifidobacteria reduced endotoxaemia and improved glucose tolerance and insulin secretion, as well as reducing inflammation development in HF-diet-fed mice. Together, these findings suggest that the gut microbiota contribute to the pathophysiological regulation of endotoxaemia and set the tone of inflammation, glucose tolerance and insulin secretion.

Thus, specific strategies for modifying gut microbiota in favour of bifidobacteria could be useful tools for reducing the impact of high-fat feeding on the occurrence of metabolic diseases.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by an FSR (Fonds Spéciaux de Recherche) grant from the Université catholique de Louvain and by a grant from the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS 1.5.231.06-Belgium). P. D. Cani is a postdoctoral researcher from the FNRS Belgium. We would like to thank C. Feyt, and E. Delmée for helpful criticism and F. Debacker for excellent technical assistance.

Duality of interest

The authors declare that there is no duality of interest associated with this manuscript.

Supplementary material

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007