BABYDIET, a feasibility study to prevent the appearance of islet autoantibodies in relatives of patients with Type 1 diabetes by delaying exposure to gluten
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Schmid, S., Buuck, D., Knopff, A. et al. Diabetologia (2004) 47: 1130. doi:10.1007/s00125-004-1420-9
- 392 Downloads
To the Editor: The early introduction of foods containing gluten or cereal before the age of 3 months is associated with an increased risk of islet autoimmunity in childhood [1, 2]. A pilot study called BABYDIET is currently underway to determine whether primary intervention through delayed introduction of dietary gluten is feasible and could reduce the incidence of islet autoimmunity in high-risk first degree relatives of patients with Type 1 diabetes.
Newborn children are eligible if they are younger than 3 months and are offspring or siblings of patients with Type 1 diabetes and also have HLA genotypes that confer a high diabetes risk (DRB1*03-DQA1*0501-DQB1*0201/DRB1*04-DQA1*0301-DQB1*0302; DRB1*04-DQA1*0301-DQB1*0302/DRB1*04-DQA1*0301-DQB1*0302 or DRB1*03-DQA1*0501-DQB1*0201/ DRB1*03-DQA1*0501-DQB1*0201).
The parents of all children are informed of the potential benefits of gluten avoidance in animal models of autoimmune diabetes and of the increased risk of islet autoimmunity found in children who received diets containing gluten at an early age. Children of consenting parents are randomised to two dietary intervention groups, one that introduces gluten-containing cereals at 12 months (late exposure) and one that introduces gluten at 6 months of age in line with national feeding guidelines (control group). Each family is visited by a nutritionist who explains which cereals contain gluten, and what food should be avoided during the intervention period. Lists of the most common foods introduced during the first year of life are examined and foods and products containing gluten are indicated. Details of gluten-free commercial infant products available in Germany are provided to the parents. Children are monitored intensively with 3-monthly collection of venous blood, urine and stool, and 3-day dietary records of weighed food intake for 3 years and yearly thereafter. Infections, medication and the introduction of new food groups are recorded daily. Additional demographic and family history questionnaires are collected at 3, 12, 24 and 36 months of age, with questionnaires assessing the psychological impact collected at 3, 18 and 36 months. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (Ethikkommission der Medizinischen Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians Universität No. 329/00).
Here we report the recruitment and compliance data in the first 24 months of the study. A total of 538 infants from Germany participated in the genetic screening and 56 (10.4%) had one of the high-risk HLA genotypes. Fifty families (89%) agreed to participate in the study and were randomised to one of the dietary groups (25 children to the late gluten exposure and 25 children to the control group). The children were monitored for a median of 15 months (range: 0–36). Three families/children withdrew from the study, two at age 6 months and one at age 18 months, stating that blood-drawing was the reason for withdrawal. Although no reliable confirmatory biomarker for compliance with dietary intervention was available, food records indicated that gluten was introduced at a median of 12 months (interquartile range: 12–12 months) in the group randomised to late gluten exposure and at 6.3 months (interquartile range: 6–7 months) in the control exposure group.
Number of samples, questionnaires and protocols completed by participating families
Age at follow-up visit
The data show that dietary intervention in infants at high genetic risk of Type 1 diabetes is feasible. Intensive follow-up studies should include frequent blood sampling, which appears to be well accepted by the families, and should also provide incentives for compiling daily event records and 3-day dietary records of weighed food intake, these last two being the least well complied with components of the study.
This study was supported by grants from the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft ZI 310/14-1 and 14-2) and the Foundation for Children with Type 1 Diabetes (Stiftung ‘Das Zuckerkranke Kind’). We thank Ulrike Mollenhauer, Andrea Baumgarten, Karolina v. Dalwigk and Katharina Warncke for expert technical assistance. We also thank all participating families and German paediatricians for their participation in the study.