, Volume 99, Issue 8, pp 637–643

Cranial biomechanics of Diplodocus (Dinosauria, Sauropoda): testing hypotheses of feeding behaviour in an extinct megaherbivore


  • Mark T. Young
    • School of Earth SciencesUniversity of Bristol
    • Department of PalaeontologyThe Natural History Museum
    • School of GeosciencesUniversity of Edinburgh
    • Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative MedicineUniversity of Glasgow
  • Emily J. Rayfield
    • School of Earth SciencesUniversity of Bristol
  • Casey M. Holliday
    • Department of Pathology and Anatomical SciencesUniversity of Missouri
  • Lawrence M. Witmer
    • Department of Biomedical SciencesOhio University
  • David J. Button
    • School of Earth SciencesUniversity of Bristol
  • Paul Upchurch
    • Department of Earth SciencesUniversity College London
    • Department of PalaeontologyThe Natural History Museum
Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s00114-012-0944-y

Cite this article as:
Young, M.T., Rayfield, E.J., Holliday, C.M. et al. Naturwissenschaften (2012) 99: 637. doi:10.1007/s00114-012-0944-y


Sauropod dinosaurs were the largest terrestrial herbivores and pushed at the limits of vertebrate biomechanics and physiology. Sauropods exhibit high craniodental diversity in ecosystems where numerous species co-existed, leading to the hypothesis that this biodiversity is linked to niche subdivision driven by ecological specialisation. Here, we quantitatively investigate feeding behaviour hypotheses for the iconic sauropod Diplodocus. Biomechanical modelling, using finite element analysis, was used to examine the performance of the Diplodocus skull. Three feeding behaviours were modelled: muscle-driven static biting, branch stripping and bark stripping. The skull was found to be ‘over engineered’ for static biting, overall experiencing low stress with only the dentition enduring high stress. When branch stripping, the skull, similarly, is under low stress, with little appreciable difference between those models. When simulated for bark stripping, the skull experiences far greater stresses, especially in the teeth and at the jaw joint. Therefore, we refute the bark-stripping hypothesis, while the hypotheses of branch stripping and/or precision biting are both consistent with our findings, showing that branch stripping is a biomechanically plausible feeding behaviour for diplodocids. Interestingly, in all simulations, peak stress is observed in the premaxillary–maxillary ‘lateral plates’, supporting the hypothesis that these structures evolved to dissipate stress induced while feeding. These results lead us to conclude that the aberrant craniodental form of Diplodocus was adapted for food procurement rather than resisting high bite forces.


Finite element analysisPalaeobiologyHerbivorySauropod dinosaur

Supplementary material

114_2012_944_MOESM1_ESM.docx (10.1 mb)
ESM 1(DOCX 10 mb)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012