uPAR signaling is under par for the podocyte course
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Luft, F.C. J Mol Med (2012) 90: 1357. doi:10.1007/s00109-012-0980-2
- 583 Downloads
The urokinase receptor, also known as uPAR or cluster of differentiation (CD) 87, is a multidomain glycoprotein tethered to the cell membrane with a glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor. uPAR was originally identified as the binding site for the extracellular protease urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) on the cell surface. However, uPAR interacts with many other proteins such as vitronectin, the uPAR-associated protein, and integrins . uPAR is a part of the plasminogen activation system, which is not only involved in hemostasis but also in tissue reorganization including mammary gland involution and wound healing. The plasminogen activation system is important in reorganizing tissues through proteolysis. uPAR restricts plasminogen activation to the immediate vicinity of the cell membrane. Coordination of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteolysis and cell signaling underlies uPAR’s important function in cell migration, proliferation, and survival. As a result, various pharmaceutical strategies are under development to target uPAR in combating cancer and other conditions .
uPAR signaling has also been implicated in cardiovascular disease . The process of atherosclerosis involves the recruitment of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) from the media into the intima. VSMC subsequently proliferate and form a neointima in a process called vascular remodeling. In this process, the VSMC express high levels of uPA and uPAR. uPA mediates ECM degradation and is important to cell adhesion, migration, and proliferation during the remodeling process. The uPA/uPAR complex also conducts intracellular signaling. For instance, Kiyan et al. recently identified a new molecular mechanism controlling VSMC phenotypic modulation in vitro and in vivo. They found that uPAR acts together with myocardin, the platelet-derived growth factor-β receptor, and SUMOylated RanGAP1 to mediate this process .
uPAR signaling is also important to kidney disease. uPAR is expressed by several cell types in diseased kidneys. Studies in uPAR gene-deleted mice suggest that uPAR serves a protective role in the process of renal fibrosis. For instance, uPAR interacts with specific co-receptors to degrade plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 and ECM. Moreover, a soluble short form of uPAR (suPAR) exists which has leukocyte chemo-attractant properties . suPAR is the result of cleavage and release of membrane-bound uPAR.
The relevance of uPAR to renal disease gained an additional dimension when Wei et al.  reported that uPAR signaling in glomerular podocytes leads to foot process effacement and proteinuria. Podocytes regulate the glomerular filtration barrier. We now know that focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), a major cause of end-stage renal disease worldwide, is a podocyte disease. Wei et al.  found that mice lacking uPAR were protected from lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-mediated proteinuria; however, they developed disease after expression of a constitutively active β3 integrin. Wei et al. then performed gene transfer studies to show that uPAR expression in podocytes was required for development of LPS-mediated proteinuria, a commonly utilized model. The investigators then showed that uPAR was required to activate αvβ3 integrin in podocytes, promoting cell motility and activation of small GTPases. Blockade of αvβ3 integrin reduced podocyte motility in vitro and lowered proteinuria. These findings introduced uPAR signaling to the arena of glomerular permeability.
Wei et al.  then introduced the next startling findings regarding uPAR in podocytes. They reported that suPAR, introduced above, is elevated in about two thirds of patients with FSGS, but not in patients with other glomerular diseases. FSGS commonly recurs after transplantation. Wei et al.  also found that high concentrations of suPAR before transplantation were associated with increased risk for recurrence of FSGS after transplantation. They next used three mouse models to explore the effects of suPAR on kidney function and morphology. They showed that circulating suPAR activated podocyte β3 integrin, causing foot process effacement, proteinuria, and a histological picture consistent with FSGS. The findings suggest that FSGS could develop when suPAR is sufficient to activate the podocyte β3 integrin. Conceivably, suPAR could be a therapeutic target in FSGS.
The therapeutic relevance of the uPAR-FSGS story does not end with cyclosporine, which is after all, pretty toxic stuff. Amiloride has a significant role in the reduction of podocyte cell motility in vitro and proteinuria in mice. Zhang et al.  have also shown that amiloride inhibits the induction of the Plaur gene and uPAR mRNA, thereby reducing uPAR-mediated β3 integrin activation in LPS-treated podocytes. Interestingly, the off-target effect of amiloride was independent of its function as epithelial sodium channel blocker and different from the actions of triamterene. Amiloride was also effective in the LPS mouse model of transient proteinuria and in the five of six nephrectomy rat FSGS model. The mechanisms involved a significant inhibition of podocyte uPAR induction. In addition, amiloride attenuated glomerulosclerosis histologically. Thus, the exciting question can be raised that amiloride could ameliorate a pathological uPAR–β3 integrin signaling axis in FSGS patients.
Friedrich C. Luft