Skip to main content
Log in

Ecotoxicity of heat-treated Kapur and Japanese larch

  • Original
  • Published:
European Journal of Wood and Wood Products Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Kapur (Dryobalanops sp.) and Japanese larch (Larix kaempferi) wood samples were heat-treated in air at 180 °C for 24 and 48 h. Leaching and toxicity tests were conducted to determine the ecotoxicity effect of these heat-treated woods on the aquatic environment due to heat treatment. The toxicity of conventional preservative-treated woods, i.e. chromated copper arsenate (CCA) and ammoniacal copper quat (ACQ), was also determined for comparison purposes. Acute toxicity tests were performed using two aquatic organisms, Daphnia magna and Vibrio fischeri according to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development standard procedures and Microtox assay, respectively. Significantly low toxicity to D. magna was found for the heat-treated Kapur compared to that of untreated Kapur, while heat-treated Japanese larch did not show any toxicity effect. As expected, ACQ-treated samples showed the highest toxicity to D. magna, followed by that of CCA, though toxicity of both preservative-treated woods further reduced over time. Hence, heat treatment of Kapur and Japanese larch were believed to be not harmful to the aquatic ecosystem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albuquergue RM, Cragg SM (1995) Fouling organisms as the indicators of the environmental impact of marine preservative treated wood. IRG/WP/95-50036. The International Research Group on Wood Preservation, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • AWPA U1–11 (2011) Use category system: user specification for treated wood. Book of standards. American Wood Protection Association Inc, Birmingham

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vetter LD, Depraetere G, Janssen C, Stevens M, Van Acker J (2008) Methodology to assess both the efficacy and ecotoxicology of preservative-treated and modified wood. Ann For Sci 65:504–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vetter LD, Pilgard A, Treu A, Westin M, Van Acker J (2009) Combined evaluation of durability and ecotoxicity: a case study on furfurylated wood. Wood Mater Sci Eng 4:30–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doe K, Scroggins R, McLeay D, Wohlgeschaffen G (2005) Solid-phase test for sediment toxicity using the luminescent bacterium Vibrio fischeri. In: Blaise C, Férard JF (eds) Small-scale freshwater toxicity investigations, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 107–136

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey B, Townsend T, Bitton G (2005) Comparison of temporal changes in metal leaching and aquatic toxicity from wood treated with CCA and alternative preservatives. IRG/WP/05-50236. The International Research Group on Wood Protection, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • EN 84 (1997) Wood preservatives. Accelerated ageing of treated wood prior to biological testing. Leaching procedure. CEN European Committee for Standardization, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteves B, Graca J, Pereira H (2008) Extractive composition and summative chemical analysis of thermally treated eucalypt wood. Holzforschung 62:344–351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Esteves B, Videira R, Pereira H (2011) Chemistry and ecotoxicity of heat-treated pine wood extractives. Wood Sci Technol 45:661–676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fulladosa E, Murat JC, Martinez M, Villaescusa I (2004) Effect of pH on arsenate and arsenite toxicity to luminescent bacteria (Vibrio fischeri). Arch Environ Con Tox 46:176–182

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fulladosa E, Murat JC, Martínez M, Villaescusa I (2005) Patterns of metals and arsenic poisoning in Vibrio fischeri bacteria. Chemosphere 60:43–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gellert G (2000) Sensitivity and significance of luminescent bacteria in chronic toxicity testing based on growth and bioluminescence. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 45:87–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton MA, Russo RC, Thurston RV (1977) Trimmed Spearman–Karber method for estimating median lethal concentrations in toxicity bioassays. Environ Sci Technol 11:714–718

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill CAS (2006) Wood modification: chemical, thermal and other processes. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kamdem DP, Pizzi A, Triboulot MC (2000) Heat-treated timber: potentially toxic byproducts presence and extent of wood cell wall degradation. Holz Roh- Werkst 58:253–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kamdem DP, Pizzi A, Jermannaud A (2002) Durability of heat-treated wood. Holz Roh- Werkst 60:1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim G, Yun K, Kim J (1998) Effect of heat treatment on the decay resistance and the bending properties of radiata pine sapwood. Mater Org 32:101–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande S, Eikenes M, Westin M (2004) Chemistry and ecotoxicology of furfurylated wood. Scand J For Res 19:14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manusadžianas L, Balkelyt L, Sadauskas K, Blinova I, Pollumaa L, Kahru A (2003) Ecotoxicological study of Lithuanian and Estonian wastewaters: selection of the biotests, and correspondence between toxicity and chemical-based indices. Aquat Toxicol 63:27–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nuopponen M, Vuorinen T, Jamsa S, Viitaniemi P (2003) The effects of heat treatment on the behaviour of extractives in softwood studied by FTIR spectroscopic methods. Wood Sci Technol 37:109–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2004) Daphnia sp., acute immobilization test and reproduction test. Guideline for testing of chemicals No. 202. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Parvez S, Venkataraman C, Mukherji S (2006) A review on advantages of implementing luminescence inhibition test (Vibrio fischeri) for acute toxicity prediction of chemicals. Environ Int 32:265–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peh TB, Khoo KC, Lee TW (1986) Pulp and paper industry and research in Peninsular Malaysia. Malay For Rec 31:44–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez KFB, Charlatchka R, Sahli L, Férard JF (2012) New methodological improvements in the Microtox® solid phase assay. Chemosphere 86:105–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilgard A, Treu A, Van Zeeland AN, Gosselink RJ, Westin M (2010) Toxic hazard and chemical analysis of leachates from furfurylated wood. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:1067–1071

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stabili L, Giangrande A, Pizzolante G, Caruso G, Alifano P (2014) Characterization of vibrios diversity in the mucus of the polychaete Myxicola infundibulum (Annellida, Polichaeta). Microb Ecol 67:186–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stook K, Dubey B, Ward M, Townsend T, Solo-Gabriele H, Bitton G (2005) Relative leaching and aquatic toxicity of pressure-treated wood products using batch-leaching tests. Environ Sci Technol 39:155–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tarakanadha B, Morrell JJ, Rao KS (2004) Impacts of wood preservatives (CCA, CCB, CDDC, ACZA, ACQ and ACC) on the settlement and growth of fouling organisms. Environmental impacts of preservative-treated wood. Paper presented at environmental impacts of preservative-treated wood, Orlando, Florida, 8–11 Feb 2004. CRC Press, Florida, pp 320–335

  • Turpeinen R, Kairesalo T, Häggblom MM (2004) Microbial community structure and activity in arsenic, chromium-and copper-contaminated soils. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 47:39–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2006) Trimmed Spearman–Karber program, version 1.5, user’s guide. USEPA, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

  • Weis P, Weis JS (1999) Accumulation of metals in consumers associated with chromated copper arsenate-treated wood panels. Mar Environ Res 48:73–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Department of Environmental and Ecological Engineering of Korea University, South Korea for providing a research grant that made this work possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabiha Salim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salim, S., Ashaari, Z., Choi, YS. et al. Ecotoxicity of heat-treated Kapur and Japanese larch. Eur. J. Wood Prod. 74, 243–248 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-015-1000-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-015-1000-3

Keywords

Navigation