Variation in resource size distribution around colonies changes ant–parasitoid interactions Research Article First Online: 10 April 2010 Received: 23 October 2009 Revised: 24 March 2010 Accepted: 27 March 2010 DOI:
Cite this article as: Wilkinson, E.B. & Feener, D.H. Insect. Soc. (2010) 57: 385. doi:10.1007/s00040-010-0095-0 Abstract
The distribution of resources within habitats affects species abundance, richness and composition, but the role of resource distribution in species interactions is rarely studied. In ant communities, changes in resource distribution within habitats may influence behavioral interactions because many ant species are specialized to efficiently harvest a subset of available resources. This study investigates whether interactions between the behaviorally dominant host ant
Pheidole diversipilosa and its specialist parasitoid (Phoridae: Apocephalus orthocladus) depend on resource size distribution around the colony. Using in situ foraging arenas to manipulate parasitoid abundance and resource size distribution around colonies, we tested whether variation in resource size distribution allows P. diversipilosa to alter its foraging behavior in ways that lessen the impact of parasitoid attack. P. diversipilosa colonies do not lower the impact of parasitoid attack by increasing the number of workers foraging individually on small and widely dispersed resources. However, the presence of multiple large resources allows colonies to temporarily redistribute soldier ants from resources patrolled by parasitoids to other resources not patrolled by parasitoids, and to maintain soldier abundance at levels found in the absence of parasitoids. These results highlight the importance of placing behavioral interactions within the context of variation in resource distribution. Keywords Ants Parasitoids Resource size distribution Competition References
Adler F.R., LeBrun E.G. and Feener D.H., Jr. 2007. Maintaining diversity in an ant community: Modeling, extending, and testing the dominance-discovery trade-off.
Burkhardt J.F. 1998. Individual flexibility and tempo in the ant,
, the influence of group size.
J. Insect Behav.
Cerda X., Retana J. and Cros S. 1998. Prey size reverses the outcome of interference interactions of scavenger ants.
Chase J.M., Leibold M.A., Downing A.L. and Shurin J.B. 2000. The effects of productivity, herbivory, and plant species turnover in grassland food webs.
Davidson D.W. 1998. Resource discovery versus resource domination in ants: a functional mechanism for breaking the trade-off.
Davidson D.W., Inouye R.S. and Brown J.H. 1984. Granivory in a desert ecosystem experimental evidence for indirect facilitation of ants by rodents.
Deslippe R.J. and Savolainen R. 1994. Role of food supply in structuring a population of
J. Anim. Ecol.
Ernest S.K.M., Brown J.H. and Parmenter R.R. 2000. Rodents, plants, and precipitation: Spatial and temporal dynamics of consumers and resources.
Feener D.H., Jr. 1981. Competition between ant species: outcome controlled by parasitic flies.
Feener D.H., Jr. 2000. Is the assembly of ant communities mediated by parasitoids?
Feener D.H., Jr. and Brown B.V. 1992. Reduced foraging of
Solenopsis geminata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the presence of parasitic Pseudacteon spp. (Diptera: Phoridae). Entomol. Soc. Am.
Folgarait P.J. and Gilbert L.E. 1999. Phorid parasitoids affect foraging activity of
under different availability of food in Argentina.
CrossRef Google Scholar
Formanowicz D.R., Jr. and Bobka M.S. 1989. Predation risk and microhabitat preference: an experimental study of the behavioral responses of prey and predator.
Am. Midl. Nat.
Fraser D.F. and Huntingford F.A. 1986. Feeding and avoiding predation hazard: The behavioral response of the prey.
Jacob J. and Brown J.S. 2000. Microhabitat use, giving-up densities and temporal activity as short- and long-term anti-predator behaviors in common voles.
Joern A. 2005. Disturbance by fire frequency and bison grazing modulate grasshopper assemblages in tallgrass prairie.
Kneitel J.M. and Chase J.M. 2004. Disturbance, predator, and resource interactions alter container community composition.
LeBrun E.G. 2005. Who is the top dog in ant communities? Resources, parasitoids, and multiple competitive hierarchies.
LeBrun E.G. and Feener D.H., Jr 2002. Linked indirect effects in ant-phorid interactions: impacts on ant assemblage structure.
LeBrun E.G. and Feener D.H., Jr. 2007. When trade-offs interact: balance of terror enforces dominance discovery trade-off in a local ant assemblage.
J. Anim. Ecol.
Morehead S.A. and Feener D.H., Jr. 2000. An experimental test of potential host range in the ant parasitoid
Morrison L.W. 2000. Mechanisms of
parasitoid (Diptera: Phoridae) effects on exploitative and interference competition in host
ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).
Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am.
Nonacs P. and Dill L.M. 1990. Mortality risk vs. food quality trade-offs in a common currency: ant patch preferences.
Oksanen J., Blanchet F.G., Kindt R., Legendre P., O’Hara R.B., Simpson G.L., Solymos P., Stevens M.H. and Wagner H. 2007. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 1.17-2.
Orr M.R., Seike S.H., Benson W.W. and Gilbert L.E. 1995. Flies suppress fire ants.
Rothley K.D., Schmidtz O.J. and Cohon J.L. 1997. Foraging to balance conflicting demands: Novel insights from grasshoppers under predation risk.
Sanders N.J. and Gordon D.M. 2003. Resource-dependent interactions and the organization of desert ant communities.
Sokal R.R. and Rohlf F.J. 1995.
Biometry. Freeman, New York. 887 pp
SYSTAT. 2004. Systat version 11, Richmond, CA
Valone T.J. and Kaspari M. 2005. Interactions between granivorous and omnivorous ants in a desert grassland: results from a long-term experiment.
Wilkinson E.B. and Feener D.H., Jr. 2007. Habitat complexity modifies ant-parasitoid interactions: implications for community dynamics and the role of disturbance.
Google Scholar Copyright information
© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2010