International Journal of Public Health

, Volume 54, Supplement 2, pp 140–150

The Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: methodological developments and current tensions

  • Chris Roberts
  • J. Freeman
  • O. Samdal
  • C. W. Schnohr
  • M. E. de Looze
  • S. Nic Gabhainn
  • R. Iannotti
  • M. Rasmussen
  • the International HBSC Study Group
Original article

DOI: 10.1007/s00038-009-5405-9

Cite this article as:
Roberts, C., Freeman, J., Samdal, O. et al. Int J Public Health (2009) 54(Suppl 2): 140. doi:10.1007/s00038-009-5405-9

Abstract

Objectives:

To describe the methodological development of the HBSC survey since its inception and explore methodological tensions that need to be addressed in the ongoing work on this and other large-scale cross-national surveys.

Methods:

Using archival data and conversations with members of the network, we collaboratively analysed our joint understandings of the survey’s methodology.

Results:

We identified four tensions that are likely to be present in upcoming survey cycles: (1) maintaining quality standards against a background of rapid growth, (2) continuous improvement with limited financial resources, (3) accommodating analysis of trends with the need to improve and adapt questionnaire content, and (4) meeting the differing requirements of scientific and policy audiences.

Conclusions:

While these challenges are not trivial, the structure of the HBSC network and its long-term experience in working through such challenges renders it likely that HBSC can provide a model of other similar studies facing these tensions.

Keywords:

Survey developmentLarge-scale surveysScientific versus policy concernsCross-national data management

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Roberts
    • 1
  • J. Freeman
    • 2
  • O. Samdal
    • 3
  • C. W. Schnohr
    • 4
  • M. E. de Looze
    • 5
  • S. Nic Gabhainn
    • 6
  • R. Iannotti
    • 7
  • M. Rasmussen
    • 8
  • the International HBSC Study Group
  1. 1.Research and Evaluation Branch, Public Health Strategy Division, Public Health and Health Professions DepartmentWelsh Assembly GovernmentCardiffUK
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  3. 3.Research Centre for Health Promotion, Faculty of PsychologyUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
  4. 4.Department of Public HealthUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  5. 5.Faculty of Social and Behavioural SciencesUtrecht UniversityUtrechtNetherlands
  6. 6.Health Promotion Research CentreNational University of IrelandGalwayIreland
  7. 7.National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentBethesdaUSA
  8. 8.Department of Public HealthUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark