Journal of High Energy Physics

, 2012:140

Higgs boson mass and new physics

  • Fedor Bezrukov
  • Mikhail Yu. Kalmykov
  • Bernd A. Kniehl
  • Mikhail Shaposhnikov
Article

DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2012)140

Cite this article as:
Bezrukov, F., Kalmykov, M.Y., Kniehl, B.A. et al. J. High Energ. Phys. (2012) 2012: 140. doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2012)140

Abstract

We discuss the lower Higgs boson mass bounds which come from the absolute stability of the Standard Model (SM) vacuum and from the Higgs inflation, as well as the prediction of the Higgs boson mass coming from the asymptotic safety of the SM. We account for the three-loop renormalization group evolution of the couplings of the SM and for a part of the two-loop corrections that involve the QCD coupling αs to the initial conditions for their running. This is one step beyond the current state-of-the-art procedure (“one-loop matching-two-loop running”). This results in a reduction of the theoretical uncertainties in the Higgs boson mass bounds and predictions, associated with the SM physics, to 1–2 GeV. We find that with the account of existing experimental uncertainties in the mass of the top quark and αs (taken at the 2σ level) the bound reads MH ≥ Mmin (equality corresponds to the asymptotic-safety prediction), where \( {{M}_{{\min }}}=\left( {129\pm 6} \right) \) GeV. We argue that the discovery of the SM Higgs boson in this range would be in agreement with the hypothesis of the absence of new energy scales between the Fermi and Planck scales, whereas the coincidence of MH with Mmin would suggest that the electroweak scale is determined by Planck physics. In order to clarify the relation between the Fermi and Planck scales a construction of an electron-positron or muon collider with a center-of-mass energy ~ (200 + 200 GeV) (Higgs and t-quark factory) would be needed.

Keywords

Standard ModelHiggs PhysicsRenormalization Group

Copyright information

© SISSA, Trieste, Italy 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fedor Bezrukov
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mikhail Yu. Kalmykov
    • 3
  • Bernd A. Kniehl
    • 3
  • Mikhail Shaposhnikov
    • 4
  1. 1.Physics DepartmentUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsU.S.A.
  2. 2.RIKEN-BNL Research CenterBrookhaven National LaboratoryUptonU.S.A.
  3. 3.II. Institut für Theoretische PhysikUniversität HamburgHamburgGermany
  4. 4.Institut de Théorie des Phénomènes Physiques, École Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneLausanneSwitzerland