Aging Clinical and Experimental Research

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 407–417

Diversity, dispersion and inconsistency of reaction time measures: effects of age and task complexity

Original Articles

DOI: 10.1007/BF03324837

Cite this article as:
Gorus, E., De Raedt, R. & Mets, T. Aging Clin Exp Res (2006) 18: 407. doi:10.1007/BF03324837


Background and aims: Performance variability of reaction time is regarded as an important parameter for cognitive functioning with aging. We investigated three types of variability, diversity (or variability between persons), dispersion (variability across trials within one task) and inconsistency (variability across testing occasions), while distinguishing between decision time and movement time and evaluating performance across comparable complexity levels. Methods: A single stratified reaction time test based on tasks with increasing complexity was used to evaluate inter- and intra-performance variability of 27 older (age 75±5 years) and 27 younger (age 29±7 years) participants, subdividing reaction time into decision and movement components. Results: There were consistent age and complexity differences for all variability types in our sample. When controlling for processing speed, which was slower in the older group, variability across age groups and task complexity tended to diminish and a more complex picture emerged. The elderly group showed a higher diversity of all reaction time measures, except for movement time, and a higher dispersion of decision time. Task complexity significantly affected the diversity of movement and overall reaction times and the dispersion of all reaction time measures, except for movement time. Conclusions: These results highlight the importance of variability in cognitive functioning; it may be an important phenomenon for study and a useful indicator for cognitive deterioration. The reaction time test we propose is easy to use and can be applied in clinical practice.


Agingdispersiondiversityinconsistencyperformance variabilityreaction time

Copyright information

© Springer Internal Publishing Switzerland 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GerontologyFree University of Brussels (VUB)Belgium
  2. 2.Gerontology and Geriatrics, Academic HospitalFree University of Brussels (VUB)BrusselsBelgium
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyGhent UniversityBelgium