Baturo, A. R., & Cooper, T. J. (1999). Fractions, reunitisation and the number-line representation. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed),*Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education* (Vol. 2, pp. 81–88). Haifa, Israel: PME.

Bayazit, I., & Gray, E. (2006). Acontradiction between pedagogical content knowledge and teaching indications. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehliková (Eds),*Proceedings of 31st international conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education* (Vol. 2, pp. 121–128). Prague, Czech Republic: PME.

Biggs, J., & Collis, K. (1982).*Evaluating the quality of learning: the SOLO Taxonomy*. New York: Academic Press.

Bruner, J. S. (1966).*Towards a theory of instruction*. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Denvir, H., & Askew, M. (2001). Pupils’ participation in the classroom examined in relation to “interactive whole class teaching”. In T. Rowland (Ed.),*Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics day conference held at Manchester Metropolitan University, March 2001* (Vol. 2, pp. 25–30). London, UK: BSRLM.

Cobb, P., Yackel, E. & Wood, T. (1992). A constructivist alternative to the representational view of mind in mathematics education.

*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23*, 12–33.

CrossRefCrick, F. (1994).*The astonishing hypothesis*. London: Simon & Schuster.

Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). (1999).*The National Numeracy Strategy: Framework for teaching mathematics from reception to year 6*. London: DfEE.

Doritou, M. (2006).*Understanding the number line: Conception and practice*. Unpublished PhD thesis: University of Warwick.

Dubinsky, E. (1991). Reflective abstraction in advanced mathematical thinking. In D. O. Tall (Ed.),*Advanced Mathematical Thinking* (pp. 95–123). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Edelman, G. M. (1992).*Bright air, brilliant fire*. New York: Basic Books.

Escudero, I., & Sanchez, V. (2002). Integration of domains of knowledge in mathematics teachers’ practice. In A. D. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds),*Proceedings of the 26th annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education* (Vol.3, pp. 177–184). Norwich, UK: PME.

Fischbein, E. (1978). Intuition and mathematical education.*Osnabrücker Schriften zür Mathematik*, 1, 148–176.

Gray, E. M., & Pitta, D. (1996). Number processing: Qualitative differences in thinking and the role of imagery. In L. Puig & A Guitiérrez (Eds),*Proceedings of 20th annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education* (Vol.4, pp. 155–162).Valencia, Spain: PME.

Gray, E. M., & Pitta, D. (1997). Emily and the supercalculator. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.),*Proceedings of 21st International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education* (Vol.4, pp. 17–25). Lahti, Finland: PME.

Gray, E. M., & Tall, D. O. (1994). Duality, ambiguity and flexibility: A proceptual view of simple arithmetic.*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26*, 115–141.

Gray, E. M., & Tall, D. O. (2001). Relationships between embodied objects and symbolic procepts: An explanatory theory of success and failure in mathematics. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.),*Proceedings of 25th annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education* (Vol. 3, pp. 65–72). Utrecht, The Netherlands: PME.

Gray, E. M., & Tall, D. O. (2002). Abstraction as a natural process of mental construction. In A. D. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.),*Proceedings of 26th annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education* (Vol. 1, pp. 115–119). Norwich, UK: PME.

Hebb, D. O. (1949).*Organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory*. New York: John Wiley.

Howatt, H. (2005).*Participation in elementary mathematics: An analysis of engagement, attainment and intervention*. Unpublished PhD thesis: University of Warwick

Krutetskii, V. A. (1976).*The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren*. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lima, R. N. de, & Tall, D. O. (2006). The concept of equation: What have students met before? In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Steliková (Eds),*Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education* (Vol. 4, pp. 233–241). Prague, Czech Republic: PME.

Md Ali, R. (2006).*Teachers’ indications and pupils’ construal and knowledge of fractions: The case of Malaysia*. Unpublished PhD thesis: University of Warwick.

Mejia-Ramos, P., & Tall, D. O. (2006, November).*The long-term cognitive development of different types of reasoning and proof*. Paper presented to the conference on Explanation and Proof in Mathematics: Philosophical and Educational Perspectives, Essen, Germany.

Office for Standards in Education (OfSTED). (2006).*Evaluating mathematics provision for 14–19 year-olds*. London: OfSTED.

Pegg, J. (1992). Assessing students’ understanding at the primary and secondary level in the mathematical sciences. In J. Izard & M. Stephens (Eds.),*Reshaping assessment practice: Assessment in the mathematical sciences under challenge* (pp. 368–385). Melbourne: Australian Council of Educational Research.

Pegg, J., & Tall, D. O., (2002). Fundamental cycles of cognitive growth. In A. D. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.),*Proceedings of the 26th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education* (Vol. 4, pp. 41–48). Norwich, UK: PME.

Piaget, J. (1972).*The principles of genetic epistemology* (W. Mays, Trans). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Pitta, D. (1998).*Beyond the obvious: Mental representations and elementary arithmetic*. Unpublished PhD thesis: University of Warwick

Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.),*Cognition and categorization*. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin.

*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22*, 1–36.

CrossRefSkemp, R. R. (1971).*The psychology of learning mathematics*. London: Penguin.

Skemp, R. R. (1979).*Intelligence, learning, and action*. London: Wiley.

Tall, D. O. (1999). The cognitive development of proof: Is mathematical proof for all or for some? In Z. Usiskin (Ed.),*Developments in school mathematics education around the world* (Vol, 4, pp. 117–136). Reston, VA: NCTM.

Tall, D. O. (2002). Differing modes of proof and belief in mathematics.*Proceedings of the international conference on Understanding Proving and Proving to Understand* (pp. 91–107). Taiwan: National Taiwan Normal University.

Tall, D. O. (2004). The three worlds of mathematics.*For the Learning of Mathematics, 23* (*3*), 29–33.

Tall, D. O., Gray, E M., Ali, M. b., Crowley, L. R. F., DeMarois, P., McGowen, M. C., Pitta, D., Pinto, M. M. F., Thomas, M., & Yusof, Y. b. (2001). Symbols and the bifurcation between procedural and conceptual thinking.

*Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 1*, 81–104.

CrossRefThurston, W. P. (1990). Mathematical education.*Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 37*, 844–850.

Tirosh, D., Even, R., & Robinson, N. (1998), Simplifying algebraic expressions: Teacher awareness and teaching approaches.

*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35*, 51–64.

CrossRefWhite, P., & Mitchelmore, M. (1996). Conceptual knowledge in introductory calculus,

*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27*, 79–95.

CrossRef