Abstract
This qualitative study examined how three teachers of upper elementary students used science vocabulary in their lessons. The data revealed that teachers used vocabulary to label science phenomena and interpret scientific concepts for students. The practice of labeling was used more extensively than interpreting. Teachers did not help their students understand why scientists use language in these two ways or how one informs the other. Implications for science educators include using inquiry to explicitly teach the purposes of scientific language in order to enhance elementary teachers’ knowledge of how vocabulary can aid student understanding of science.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blachowicz, C. L. Z., Fisher, P. J. L., Ogle, D., & Watts-Taffe, S. (2006). Vocabulary: Questions from the classroom.Reading Research Quarterly, 41(4), 524–539.
Blumer, H. (1969).Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2003).Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601.
Fang, Z. (2005). Scientific literacy: A systemic functional linguistics perspective.Science Education, 89, 335–347.
Gee, J. P. (2004). Language in the science classroom: Academic social languages as the heart of school-based literacy. In E. W. Saul (Ed.),Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 13–32). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. L. (1967).The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Greenwood, S. C. (2002). Making words matter: Vocabulary study in the content areas.The Clearing House, 75(5), 258–263.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993).Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Hand, B. M., Alvermann, D. E., Gee, J., Guzzetti, B. J., Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M., et al. (2003). Message from the “Island Group”: What is literacy in science literacy?Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 607–615.
Lemke, J. L. (1990).Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., Omanson, R. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (1983). The effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on reading comprehension: A replication.Journal of Reading Behavior, 15, 3–18.
Nagy, W. E., & Herman, P. A. (1987). Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: Implications for acquisition and instruction. In M. G. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.),The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 19–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000).Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
National Research Council (NRC). (1996).National science education standards [Electronic version]. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
NRC. (2000).Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy.Science Education, 87, 224–240.
Prain, V. (2006). Learning from writing in secondary science: Some theoretical and practical implications.International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 179–201.
Prain, V., & Hand, B. (1996). Writing and learning in secondary science: Rethinking practices.Teaching and Teacher Education, 12, 609–626.
Rowell, P. M. (1997). Learning in school science: The promises and practices of writing.Studies in Science Education, 30, 19–56.
Rowell, P. M., & Ebbers, M. (2004). Shaping school science: Competing discourses in an inquiry-based elementary program.International Journal of Science Education, 26(8), 915–934.
Shymansky, J. A., Yore, L. D., & Good, R. (1991). Elementary school teachers’ beliefs about and perceptions of elementary school science, science reading, science textbooks, and supportive instructional factors.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(5), 437–454.
Spencer, B. H., & Guillaume, A. M. (2006). Integrating curriculum through the learning cycle: Content-based reading and vocabulary instruction.The Reading Teacher, 60(3), 206–219.
Stahl, S. A. (1986). Three principles of effective vocabulary instruction.Journal of Reading, 29, 662–668.
Stahl, S. A., & Fairbanks, M. M. (1986). The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based meta-analysis.Review of Educational Research, 56(1), 72–110.
Sutton, C. (1996). Beliefs about science and beliefs about language.International Journal of Science Education, 18(1), 1–18.
Wickman, P. O., & Östman, L. (2002). Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism.Science Education, 86, 601–623.
Yager, R. E. (1983). The importance of terminology in teaching K-12 science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(6), 577–588.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glen, N.J., Dotger, S. Elementary teachers’ use of language to label and interpret science concepts. J Elem Sci Edu 21, 71–83 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03182358
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03182358