Fate, freedom and contingency
- Ferenc Huoranszki
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Argument for fatalism attempts to prove that free choice is a logical or conceptual impossibility. The paper argues that the first two premises of the argument are sound: propositions are either true or false and they have their truth-value eternally. But the claim that from the fatalistic premises with the introduction of some innocent further premise dire consequences follow as regards to the possibility of free choice is false. The introduced premise, which establishes the connection between the first two premises (which are about the nature of propositions) and the concept of free choice is not innocent. It creates the impression that the truth of certain propositions can somehow determine the occurrence of certain events. But no proposition can have such an effect since the counterfactuals “If proposition P were true, event E would happen” does not say anything about determination.
The argument for fatalism is, however, not a boring sophism. It does reveal something about the nature of propositional representation. It shows that each proposition represents necessarily the fact what it represents, i.e. it shows that propositions have their truth conditions non-contingently. But from this nothing follows as regards to the contingent nature of the facts represented. On the bases of the first two premises of the argument for fatalism we cannot infer to the impossibility of free choice. The argument for fatalism should not be interpreted as an attempt to prove on purely logical or conceptual grounds that we do not have the ability to influence future events by our choices. But it could be used to show something about the nature of propositional representation.
Anscombe, G.M.E.  “Aristotle and the Sea Battle”,Mind. 1–15.
Anscombe, G.M.E.  “Causality and Determination”, in Sosa, E.—M. Tooley (eds.).Causation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993, pp. 88–104.
AristotleOn Interpretation, in Mckeon, R. . pp. 40–65.
AristotleOn Interpretation, in McKeon , pp. 40–65.
Armstrong, D. M. A World of States of Affairs, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ayer, A.J.  “Fatalism”, inThe Concept of a Person and Other Essays, London: MacMillan Press, pp. 235–268.
Bernstein, M. H. Fatalism, Lincoln & London: University of Nebraska Press.
Cahn, S.M. Fate, Logic, and Time, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Chisholm, R.  “Human Freedom and the Self”, in G. Watson (ed.)Free Will, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982, pp. 24–35.
Craig, W.L. The Problem of Divine Foreknowledge and Future Contingents from Aristotle to Suarez, Leiden: E.J. Brill.
Danto, A. Narration and Knowledge, New York: Columbia University Press.
Dummett, M.  “Bringing about the Past”, inTruth and Other Enigmas, London: Duckworth, 1978, pp. 333–351.
Fisher, J.M. The Metaphysics of Free Will, Oxford: Blackwell.
Ginet, C. On Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Horwich, P. Asymmetries in Time, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Hume, D. A Treatise of Human Nature, (ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge), Oxford: Clarendon.
Kripke, S. Naming and Necessity, Oxford: Blackwell.
Lewis, D. “Causation”, inPhilosophical Papers. Volume II, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 159–213.
McKeon, R. The Basic Works of Aristotle, New York, Random House.
Melden, A. I. Free Action, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Mellor, D.H. The Fact of Causation, London: Routledge.
Menzies, P. — H. Price  “Causation as a Secondary Quality”,The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, pp. 87–203.
Oaklander, L.N. — Q. Smith Time, Change and Freedom. An Introduction to Metaphysics, London: Routledge.
Sellars, W.  “Fatalism and Determinism”, in K. Lehrer (ed.)Freedom and Determinism, New York: Random House, pp. 105–139.
Taylor, R. Metaphysics, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Tooley, M. Time, Tense, and Causation, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Van Inwagen, P. An Essay on Free Will, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
von Wright, G.H.  “On the Logic and Epistemology of the Causal Relation” in Sosa, E., Tooley, M. (eds.) 1993, Causation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 105–124.
- Fate, freedom and contingency
Volume 17, Issue 1 , pp 79-102
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Free choice
- Propositional representation
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Philosophy Department, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary