The effects of explicit science reading instruction on selected grade 7 students' metacognition and comprehension of specific science text
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This study investigated the correlations between metacognition and comprehension of science text and the differential effects of reading ability and gender on the acquisition of metacognition and science reading comprehension among an intact group of 27 students. A single-group pretest/posttest design was carried out over a 22-week instructional period by a teacher-researcher. Six reading strategies were taught using an explicit model of instruction embedded in the regular science program and reinforced across other curriculum areas as appropriate. Pretest and posttest results indicated positive correlations between metacognition (awareness and self-management) and success on reading comprehension tasks. Pretest-posttest gains indicated that 22 weeks of schooling with explicit strategy instruction significantly enhances students' metacognition and their abilities to comprehend science text across all reading abilities. A significant gender difference favoring females was found for the metacognitive self-management results.
- Britton, B. K., Glynn, S. M., & Smith, J. W. (1985). Cognitive demands of processing expository text: A cognitive workbench model. In B. K. Britton & J. B. Black (Eds.),Understanding expository text (pp. 227–248). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Craig, M. T., & Yore, L. D. (1995). Middleschool students' metacognitive knowledge about science reading and science text: An interview study.Reading Psychology, 16, 169–213. CrossRef
- Craig, M. T., & Yore, L. D. (1996). Middle school students' awareness of strategies for resolving comprehension difficulties in science reading.Journal of Research and Development in Education, 29, 226–238.
- DiGisi, L. L., & Willett, J. B. (1995). What high school biology teachers say about their textbook use: A descriptive study.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 123–142. CrossRef
- Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction.Review of Education Research, 61, 239–264.
- Garner, R. (1994). Metacognition and executive control.In R. B. Ruddel, M. R. Ruddel, & H. Singer (Eds.),Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed.) (pp. 715–732). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
- Glynn, S. M., & Muth, K. D. (1994). Reading and writing to learn science: Achieving scientific literacy.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 1057–1073. CrossRef
- Gottfried, S. S., & Kyle, W. C. (1992). Textbook use and the biology education desired state.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 35–49. CrossRef
- Haller, E. P., Child, D. A., & Walberg, H. J. (1988). Can comprehension be taught? A quantitative synthesis of “Metacognitive” studies.Education Researcher, 17(9), 5–8.
- Hare, V. C., & Borchardt, K. M. (1984). Direct instruction of summarization skills.Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 62–78. CrossRef
- Holden, T. (1996).Relationships among learning styles, metacognition, prior knowledge, attitude, and science achievement of grade 6 and 7 students in a guided inquiry explicit strategy instruction context. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC.
- Holliday, W. G., Yore, L. D., & Alvermann, D. E. (1994). The reading-science learning-writing connection: Breakthroughts, barriers, and promises.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 877–893. CrossRef
- Jacobs, J. E., & Paris, S. G. (1987). Children's metacognition about reading: Issues of definition, measurement, and instruction.Educational Psychologist, 22, 255–278. CrossRef
- Mallow, S. V. (1991). Reading science.Journal of Reading, 34, 324–338.
- National Research Council (NRC). (1996).National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Ogle, D. M. (1989). The know, want to know, learn strategy. In D. K. Muth (Ed.),Children's comprehension of text: Research into practice (pp. 205–223). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
- Osborne, R. J., & Wittrock, M. C. (1983). Learning science: A generative process.Science Education, 67, 489–508. CrossRef
- Paris, S. G., & Jacobs, J. E. (1984). The benefits of informal instruction for children's reading awareness and comprehension skills.Child Development, 55, 2083–2093. CrossRef
- Pearson, P. D., & Dole, J. A. (1987). Explicit comprehension instruction: A review of research and a conceptualization of instruction.Elementary School Journal, 90, 3–32.
- Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P. B., Gaskins, I., Scherder, T., Bergman, J. L., Almasi, J., & Brown, R. (1992). Beyond direct explanation: Transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies.Elementary School Journal, 92, 513–552. CrossRef
- Pressley, M., Goodchild, F., Fleet, J., Zajchowski, R., & Evans, E. D. (1989). The challenges of classroom strategy.Elementary School Journal, 89, 301–342. CrossRef
- Pressley, M., Johnson, C. J., Symons, S., McGoldrick, J. A., & Kurita, J. A. (1989). Strategies that improve memory and comprehension of what is read.Elementary School Journal, 90, 3–32. CrossRef
- Ruddell, R. B., & Unrau, N. J. (1994). Reading as a meaning-construction process: The reader, the text, and the teacher. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.),Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed.) (pp. 996–1056). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
- Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475. CrossRef
- Shymansky, J. A., Yore, L. D., & Good, R. (1991). Elementary school teachers' beliefs about and perception of elementary school science, science reading, science textbooks, and supportive instructional factors.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 437–454. CrossRef
- Simonsen, S., & Singer, H. (1992). Improving reading instruction in the content areas. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.),What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 200–219). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
- Spence, D. J. (1994).Explicit science reading instruction in grade 7: Metacognitive awareness, metacognitive self-management and science reading comprehension. Unpublished M.Ed. project, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC.
- Wilkinson, I. A. G. (1998). Dealing with diversity: Achievement gaps in reading literacy among New Zealand students.Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 144–167. CrossRef
- Yenne, W. (1987).The atlas of the solar system. Greenwich, CT: Bison Books.
- Yore, L. D. (1991). Secondary science teachers' attitudes toward and beliefs about science reading and science textbooks.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 55–72. CrossRef
- Yore, L. D., Craig, M. T., & Maguire, T. O. (1998). Index of science reading awareness: An interactive-constructive model, test verification and Grade 4–8 results.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 27–51. CrossRef
- Yore, L. D., & Shymansky, J. A. (1991). Reading in science: Developing an operational conception to guide instruction.Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2, 29–36. CrossRef
- The effects of explicit science reading instruction on selected grade 7 students' metacognition and comprehension of specific science text
Journal of Elementary Science Education
Volume 11, Issue 2 , pp 15-30
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links