Does participating in an undergraduate elementary science methods course make a difference?
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Beginning with the question, does it make a differencewhat skills are developed or inwhat sequence they are introduced, the results of this study show that science teaching skills associated with personal survival are highly visible in both the expectations of prospective teachers and in what they value from a science methods course. It is equally clear that as they become confident in their personal science knowledge base, and competent in translating this into instructional plans for children, prospective teachers become aware of the need to deal with more mature concerns of how to effectively manage children in the learning environment. As an introductory science methods course, this focus on the personal concerns of the prospective teachers makes a difference in the confidence with which they approach teaching science.
- Ajzen, I. (1988).Attitude, personality, and behavior. Chicago: The Dorsey Press.
- Anderson, R., & Mitchener, C. (1994). Research on science teacher education. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.)Handbook on Research on Science Teaching and Learning (1st Ed., p. 3–44). New York: Macmillian.
- Atwater, M., Gardner, C., & Knight C. (1991). Beliefs and attitudes of urban primary teachers toward physical science and teaching physical science.Journal of Elementary Science Education, 3, 3–12 CrossRef
- Boone, W. (1993). Preservice elementary teachers’ views toward a science methods course.Journal of Elementary Science Education, 5, 37–51. CrossRef
- Butts, D., Koballa, T., Anderson, M., & Butts, D. (1993). Relationship between teacher intentions and their classroom use of Superscience.Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2, 349–357 CrossRef
- Crawley F., & Arditzoglow, S. (1990). A descriptive study of alternative life and physical science conceptions of preservice elementary teachers.National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, Ga, Abstracts.
- Fraser-Abder, P. (1989). Participation in a curriculum development model and its effect on teacher attitude towards science teaching.School Science and Mathematics, 89, 561–570. CrossRef
- Fuller, F., Pilgrim, G., & Freeland, A. (1967). Intensive Individualization of Teacher Preparation. In ASTYearbook of Mental Health and Teacher Education, Chapter VII.
- Ginns, I., & Watters, J. (1995). An analysis of scientific understandings of preservice elementary teacher education students.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 205–222. CrossRef
- Koballa, T., Butts, D., & Riley, J. (1995). An evaluation model with participant constructed components.National Association of Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, Abstracts.
- Koballa, T., & Coble C. (1979). Effect of introducing producing practical applications on the preservice elementary teacher’s attitude toward teaching science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 16, 413–417. CrossRef
- Lederman, N., Gess-Newsome, J., & Latz, M. (1994). The nature and development of preservice science teachers’ conception of subject matter and pedagogy.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 124–146. CrossRef
- Linn, M. (1987). Establishing a base for science education: challenges trends and recommendations.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 191–216. CrossRef
- National Science Teachers Association. (1983). Board of Directors Minutes, Dallas TX, NSTA Board Meeting.
- Piper, M. (1977). The investigation of attitude changes of elementary preservice teachers in a competency based, field-oriented science methods course. In M. Piper & K. Moore (Eds.),Attitudes Toward Science Investigations. Columbus Ohio, SMEAC.
- Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., & Gentzob, W. (1982). Accommodation of a science conception: towards a theory of conceptual change.Science Education, 66, 211–227. CrossRef
- Riley, J. (1979). The influence of hands-on science process training on preservice teacher’s acquisition of process skills and attitudes toward science and science teaching.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 16, 373–384. CrossRef
- Shapley, K., & Luttrell, D. (1992). Effectiveness of mentor training of elementary colleague teachers.Journal of Elementary Science Education, 4, 1–12. CrossRef
- Shulman, L. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.)Handbook of Research on Teaching, (3rd Ed., p. 3–36) New York: Macmillan.
- Smith, E., Blakeslee, T., & Anderson, C. (1993). Teaching strategies associated with conceptual change learning in science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 111–126. CrossRef
- Stefanich, G., & Kelsey, K. (1989). Improving science attitudes of preservice elementary teachers.Science Education, 73, 187–194. CrossRef
- Strawitz, B. (1976). The effects of activity-centered elementary education science methods course on attitudes of preservice teachers.National Association of Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, Abstracts.
- Tigner, P. (1990). Avoiding science in the elementary school.Science Education, 74, 421–431 CrossRef
- Vitale, M., & Romance, N. (1992). Using video disk instruction in an elementary science methods course: remediating science knowledge deficiencies and facilitating science teaching attitudes.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 915–928. CrossRef
- Does participating in an undergraduate elementary science methods course make a difference?
Journal of Elementary Science Education
Volume 9, Issue 2 , pp 1-17
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links