Different conceptions of the nature of science among preservice elementary teachers of two countries
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This study examined the differences of the nature of science (NOS) conceptions portrayed by preservice teachers in Korea (N=42) and the United States (N=50). We conducted a survey of preservice elementary science teachers’ NOS conceptions followed by interviews in both countries to further investigate their viewpoints. The NOS domains of this investigation were Relativism versus Positivism, Inductivism versus Deductivism, Contextualism versus Decontextualism, Process versus Content, and Instrumentalism versus Realism. Findings indicated that preservice elementary science teachers’ images of science were dominated by Relativism and Process in both countries. The conceptions of preservice teachers were different, however, in Inductivism versus Deductivism, Contextualism versus Decontextualism, and Instrumentalism versus Realism. Implications of these findings are discussed at the end of this article.
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Boujaoude, S. (1997). An exploratory study of the knowledge base for science teaching.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 673–699. CrossRef
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., & BouJaoude, S. (2003). Lebanese middle school students’ views of nature of science.Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 8(1), 61–79.
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature.International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701. CrossRef
- Aikenhead, G. S., & Otsuji, H. (2000). Japanese and Canadian science teachers’ views on science and culture.Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11(4), 277–299. CrossRef
- American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1993).Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Barufaldi, J. P., Bethel, L. J., & Lamb, W. G. (1977). The effect of a science methods course on the philosophical view of science among elementary education majors.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14(4), 289–294. CrossRef
- Bauer, H. (1992).Scientific literacy and the myth of the scientific method. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
- Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice.Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 53–62. CrossRef
- Carlsen, W. S. (1991). Effects of new biology teachers’ subject-matter knowledge on curricular planning.Science Education, 75(6), 631–647. CrossRef
- Crawley, F. E., & Koballa, T. R. (1992).Attitudes/behavior change in science education: Part I — Models and methods. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA.
- Duschl, R. A. (1985). Science education and philosophy of science: Twenty-five years of mutually exclusive development.School Science and Mathematics, 85(7), 541–555. CrossRef
- Duschl, R. A. (1990).Restructuring science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Duschl, R. A., & Wright, E. (1989). A case study of high school teachers’ decision-making models for planning and teaching science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(6), 467–501. CrossRef
- Feyerabend, P. (1978).Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London: Verso.
- Gallagher, J. J. (1991). Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science.Science Education, 75(1), 121–133. CrossRef
- Greenwald, R., Hedges, L., & Laine, R. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement.Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 361–396.
- Haney, J. J., Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(9), 971–993. CrossRef
- Hodson, D. (1988). Toward a philosophically more valid science curriculum.Science Education, 71, 19–40. CrossRef
- King, B. B. (1991). Beginning teachers’ knowledge of and attitudes toward history and philosophy of science.Science Education, 75(1), 135–141. CrossRef
- Korea Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development. (2002).The 7th national science education curriculum. Seoul: Author.
- Kuhn, T. S. (1996).The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Lakin, S., & Wellington, J. (1994). Who will teach the “nature of science”? Teachers’ views of science and their implications for science education.International Journal of Science Education, 16(2), 175–190. CrossRef
- Lederman, N. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331–359. CrossRef
- Lederman, N., & Zeidler, D. L. (1987). Science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: Do they really influence teaching behavior?Science Education, 71(5), 721–734. CrossRef
- Liu, S., & Lederman, N. (2003).Taiwanese preservice teachers’ conceptions of nature and the nature of science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED474721)
- Lorsbach, A. W., Tobin, K., Briscoe, C., & Lamaster, S. (1992). An interpretation of assessment methods in middle school science.International Journal of Science Education, 14(3), 305–317. CrossRef
- Loving, C. C. (1991). The scientific theory profile: A philosophy of science model for science teachers.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 823–838. CrossRef
- Mathew, M. R. (1990). History, philosophy and science teaching: A rapprochement.Studies in Science Education, 18, 25–51. CrossRef
- Mitcherner, C. P., & Anderson, R. D. (1989). Teachers’ perspective: Developing and implementing an STS curriculum.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(4), 351–369. CrossRef
- National Research Council (NRC). (1996).National science education standards (NSES) Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). (2000).NSTA position statement: The nature of science. Retrieved February 25, 2009, from www.nsta.org/positionstatement&psid=22.
- Nott, M., & Wellington, J. (1993). Your nature of science profile: An activity for science teachers.School Science Review, 75(270), 109–112.
- Palmquist, B. C., & Finley, F. N. (1997). Preservice teachers’ view of the nature of science during a post-baccalaureate science teaching program.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 595–615. CrossRef
- Pomeroy, D. (1993). Implications of teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science: Comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers, and elementary teachers.Science Education, 77(3), 261–278. CrossRef
- Powell, R. (1994). From field science to classroom science: A case study of constrained emergence in a second-career science teacher.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(3), 273–291. CrossRef
- Schauble, L., Klopfer, L. E., & Raghavan, K. (1991). Students’ transition from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 859–882. CrossRef
- Schulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
- Shavelson, R. L., & Stern, P. (1981). Research on teacher pedagogical thoughts, judgments, decisions, and behaviors.Review of Educational Research, 51(4), 455–498.
- Smith, D. C., & Neale, D. C. (1989). The construction of subject-matter knowledge in primary science teaching.Teaching and Teacher Education, 5(1), 1–20. CrossRef
- Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1990). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. A. Duschl & R. Hamilton (Eds.),Philosophy of science, cognitive science, and educational theory and practice (pp. 1–20). Albany: SUNY Press.
- Tobin, K., & Espinet, M. (1989). Impediments to change: Applications of coaching in high school science teaching.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(2), 105–120. CrossRef
- Ziman, J. M. (1980).Teaching and learning about science and society. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Ziman, J. M. (2000).Real science: What it is, and what it means. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Different conceptions of the nature of science among preservice elementary teachers of two countries
Journal of Elementary Science Education
Volume 21, Issue 2 , pp 1-14
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links