Relationships of preservice early childhood teachers’ cultural values, ethical and cognitive developmental levels, and Views of Nature of Science
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This study explored relationships between preservice early childhood teachers’ views of nature of science (NOS), cognitive developmental levels, and their cultural values. Using the Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire (VNOS-B) and interviews, we assessed views of NOS. The Learning Context Questionnaire (LCQ) was used to determine the cognitive levels. Using the Schwartz Values Inventory, we determined cultural values. We analyzed the preservice teachers’ views of NOS by searching for patterns in responses to the VNOS-B by Perry position on the LCQ. We used SPSS to find significant correlations between cultural values and associated subscales’ cognitive levels. We found that though preservice teachers at all Perry positions held misconceptions about NOS, there were patterns of views by position; those at the position of dualism described their views in terms of one right truth, while those at the multiplicity position described their views in terms of analyzing evidence from many different interpretations.
- Abd-El-Khalick, F. S., & Akerson, V. L. (2004). Learning about nature of science as conceptual change: Factors that mediate the development of preservice elementary teachers’ views of nature of science.Science Education, 88, 785–810. CrossRef
- Akerson, V. L., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. S. (2003). Teaching elements of nature of science: A year long case study of a fourth grade teacher.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 1025–1049. CrossRef
- Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 295–317. CrossRef
- Akerson, V. L., Morrison, J. A., & Roth McDuffie, A. (2006). One course is not enough: Preservice elementary teachers’ retention of improved views of nature of science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 194–213. CrossRef
- American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993).Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Barufaldi, J. P., Bethel, L. J., & Lamb, W. G. (1977). The effect of a science methods course on the philosophical view of science among elementary education majors.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14, 289–294. CrossRef
- Buzzelli, C. A., & Johnston, B. (2002).The moral dimensions of teaching: Language, power, and culture in classroom interaction. London: Falmer.
- DeBoer, G. E. (1991).A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Fleer, M. (2006). “Meaning-making science”: Exploring the sociocultural dimensions of early childhood teacher education. In K. Appelton (Ed.),Elementary science teacher education: International perspectives on contemporary issues and practice (pp. 107–124). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Kelton, J., & Griffith, J. V. (1986).The learning context questionnaire for assessing intellectual development. Unpublished manuscript. Davidson College, Davidson, NC.
- Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions about the nature of science: A review of the research.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359. CrossRef
- Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521. CrossRef
- Lederman, J., & Lederman, N. G. (2004, November).Teaching nature of science in elementary classrooms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Science Teachers Association Midwestern Regional Convention, Indianapolis.
- Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives in science education.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 296–316. CrossRef
- McGinnis, J. R. (2006). Cultural considerations. In K. Appelton (Ed.),Elementary science teacher education: International perspectives on contemporary issues and practice (pp. 275–298). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). (2000).NSTA position statement: The nature of science. Retrieved March 18, 2003, from www.nsta.org/159&psid=22
- Phillipson-Mower, T. (April, 2005).The relationship between intellectual and ethical development and views of the nature of science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Dallas, TX.
- Perry, W. G. (1999).Forms of ethical and intellectual development in the college years: A scheme. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Pomeroy, D. (1993). Implications of teachers’ beliefs about nature of science: Comparisons of beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers and elementary teachers.Journal of Science Teacher Education, 77, 307–322.
- Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 221–279. CrossRef
- Shapiro, B. L. (1996). A case study of change in elementary student teacher thinking during an independent investigation in science: Learning about the “face of science that does not yet know.”Science Education, 80, 535–560. CrossRef
- Slay, J. (2001). Research perspectives on culturally sensitive science education.Intercultural Education, 12, 173–183. CrossRef
- Woolfolk, A. (2006).Educational psychology (10th ed.). New York: Pearson Education.
- Relationships of preservice early childhood teachers’ cultural values, ethical and cognitive developmental levels, and Views of Nature of Science
Journal of Elementary Science Education
Volume 19, Issue 1 , pp 15-24
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links