Abstract
The goal of the study was twofold: (1) to examine the relationship between the gender-stereotyped perceptions of prototypic peers excelling in different school subjects and the personal liking for these subjects; (2) to examine whether the popularity of adolescents depends on their gender-role congruent achievement at school. Participants were n=198 8th and 9th graders. Prototypical male and female peers preferring physics were conceived of as possessing more masculine and fewer feminine traits compared to prototypes favouring music. The distance between self-image and description of prototype varied according to sex and the favourite school subject the prototypic peer was associated with. Students preferred physics/music to the extent that they conceived of themselves as similar to the physics/music prototype. Analysis of variance on presumed popularity of male and female peers excelling in physical science or music showed that boys appear to sanction gender role nonconformity (disliking girls with the favourite subject physics and boys with the favourite subject music), while girls are perceived as liking peers who favour physics less than peers who favour music, regardless of their sex. Female participants excelling in physical science did report feeling unpopular with boys, whereas male participants excelling in music did not.
Résumé
Objectifs de l’étude: (1) examiner la relation entre les perceptions genre-stéréotypées prototypiques excellant dans les sujets d’école différents et l’affection personnelle pour ces sujets; (2) examiner si la popularité des adolescents dépend de leur accomplissement à l’école conformément à genre-rôle. Participants: n=198 (8èmes et 9èmes classes). Mâle et femelle prototypiques pairs préférant la physique étaient perçue comme possédant plus de traits masculin et moins de traits féminin en comparaison des prototypiques favorisant la musique. La distance entre l’image de soi et la description de prototypique varié selon le sexe et selon sujet d’ecole préférée le pair prototypique était associé. Les étudiants préféraient la physique/la musique dans la mesure où ils ont conçu soi-même comme similaire au prototype de physique/musique. L’analyse de variance sur la popularité présumée de mâle et femelle pairs excellant dans la physique ou la musique a montré que les garçons sanctionnaient la discordance de rôle de sexe (ils sont perçue comme détestant des filles avec une préférence pour la physique et les garçons avec une préférence pour la musique), tandis que les filles sont perçues comme aimant les pairs qui préférant la physique moins que pairs qui préférant la, indifféremment de leur sexe.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carter, D.B. (1987). The roles of peers in sex-role socialization. In D.B. Carter (Ed.),Current Conceptions of Sex Roles and Sex Typing (pp. 101–121). New York: Praeger.
Cejka, M.A., & Eagly, A.H. (1999). Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 413–423.
Deaux, K., & LaFrance, M. (1998). Gender. In D.T. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.),The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 788–827). New York: McGraw Hill.
Eaton, Y.M., Mitchell, M.L., & Jolley, J.M. (1991). Gender differences in the development of relationships during late adolescence.Adolescence, 26, 565–568.
Feather, N.T. (1995). Values, valences, and choices: The influence of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(6), 1135–1151.
Fries, S., Schmid, S., Dietz, F., & Hofer, M. (2005). Conflicting values and their impact on learning.European Journal of Psychology of Education, XX(3), 259–273.
Hair, J.F., Tatham, R.L., Anderson, R.E., & Black, W. (1998).Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ, US: Prentice Hall.
Hannover, B., & Kessels, U. (2002). Challenge the science-stereotype! Der einfluss von technikfreizeitkursen auf das naturwissenschaften-stereotyp von schülerinnen und schülern.Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 45, Beiheft, 341–358.
Hannover, B., & Kessels, U. (2004). Self-to-prototype matching as a strategy for making academic choices. Why German high school students do not like math and science.Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 51–67.
Havighurst, R.J. (1948).Developmental tasks and education. New York: Longman.
Hill, J., & Lynch, M. (1983). The intensification, of gender-related role expectations during early adolescence. In J. Brooks-Gunn & A. Petersen (Eds.),Girls at puberty: Biological and psychosocial perspectives (pp. 201–228). New York: Plenum.
Hoffmann, L., Häußler, P., & Peters-Haft, S. (1997).An den Interessen von mädchen und jungen orientierter physikunterricht. Ergebnisse eines BLK-Modellversuchs. Kiel: Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften an der Universität Kiel.
Hyde, J.S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S.J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139–155.
Kessels, U. (2002).Undoing gender in der schule. Eine empirische studie über koedukation und geschlechtsidentität im physikunterricht. Weinheim/München: Juventa.
Kessels, U., & Hannover, B. (2002). Die Auswirkungen von stereotypen über schulfächer auf die berufswahlabsichten jugendlicher. In B. Spinath & E. Heise (Eds.),Pädagogische psychologie unter gewandelten gesellschaftlichen bedingungen (pp. 53–67). Hamburg: Kovac.
Kessels, U., & Hannover, B. (2004). Empfundene “selbstnähe” als mediator zwischen fähigkeitsselbstkonzept und leistungskurswahlintentionen.Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 3, 130–138.
Kessels, U., & Hannover, B. (2005). Entwicklung schulischer interessen als identitätsregulation. In D.J. & M. Prenzel (Eds.),Schulische und außerschulische Ansätze zur Verbesserung der Bildungsqualität (pp. 345–359). Münster: Waxmann.
LaFontana, K.M., & Cillessen, A.H.N. (2002). Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multimethod assessment.Developmental Psychology, 38(5), 635–647.
Lörcher, G.A., & Maier, P.H. (2000).Was erreichen schüler und lehrer im fach mathematik? Eine empirische analyse der realschulabschlussprüfung in baden-württemberg. Freiburg: Pädagogische Hochschule Freiburg, Institut für Mathematik und Informatik und ihre Didaktiken.
Martin, C.L., Eisenbud, L., & Rose, H. (1995). Children’s gender-based reasoning about toys.Child Development, 66, 1453–1471.
Marx, D.M., & Roman, J.S. (2002). Female role models: Protecting women’s math test performance.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1183–1193.
Niedenthal, P.M., Cantor, N., & Kihlstrom, J.F. (1985). Prototype matching: A strategy for social decision making.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(3), 575–584.
Nosek, B.A., Banaji, M.R., & Greenwald, A.G. (2002). Math=Male, Me=Female, therefore Math? Me.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 44–59.
Peetsma, T.T.D. (1997).Decline in pupils’ motivation during secondary education. Paper presented at the 7th EARLI Conference in Athens (August).
Quatman, T., Sokolik, E., & Smith, K. J. (2000). Adolescent perception of peers’ success: A gendered perspective over time.Sex Roles, 43(1/2), 61–84.
Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories.Cognitive Psychologist, 4, 328–350.
Ruggiero, K.M., & Major, B.N. (1998). Group status and attributions to discrimination: Are low- or high-status group members more likely to blame their failure on discrimination?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(8), 821–837.
Setterlund, M.B., & Niedenthal, P.M. (1993). “Who am I? Why am I here?” Self-esteem, self-clarity, and prototype matching.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 769–780.
Taylor, D.M., Wright, S.C., Moghaddam, F.M., & Lalonde, R.N. (1990). The personal/group discrimination discrepancy: Perceiving my group, but not myself, to be a target for discrimination.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16(2), 254–262.
Wild, E., Remy, K., Gerber, J., & Exeler, J. (2000).Dokumentation der skalen- und itemauswahl für den kinderfragebogen zur lernmotivation und zum emotionalen erleben. Bielefeld: Universität Bielefeld, Arbeitseinheit 09 “Pädagogische Psychologie”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The current research was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) allocated to Bettina Hannover.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kessels, U. Fitting into the stereotype: How gender-stereotyped perceptions of prototypic peers relate to liking for school subjects. Eur J Psychol Educ 20, 309–323 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173559
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173559