Anderson, B. W., A. Higgins, and R. D. Ohmart. 1977. Avian use of saltcedar communities in the lower Colorado River vallev. p. 128–136.In R. R. Johnson and D. A. Jones (tech. coords.) Importance, preservation, and management of riparian habitats: a symposium. U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO, USA. General Technical Report RM-43.
Brode, J. M. and R. B. Bury. 1984. The importance of riparian systems to amphibians and reptiles. p. 30–36.In R. E. Warner and K. M. Hendrix (eds.) California Riparian Systems: Ecology, Conservation, and Productive Management. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Brock, J. H. 1994.Tamurix spp. (salt cedar), an invasive exotic woody plant in arid and semi-arid riparian habitats of western USA. p. 27–44.In L. C. de Waal, L. E. Child, P. M. Wade, and J. H. Brock (tech. eds.) Ecology and Management of Invasive Riverside Plants. John Wiley and Sons, London England.
Brotherson, J. D. and D. Field. 1987. Famarix: impacts of a successful weed. Rangelands 9:110–112.
Busch, D. E. and S. D. Smith. 1995. Mechanisms associated with decline of woody species in riparian ecosystems of the south-western U.S. Ecological Monographs 65:347–370.CrossRef
Cohan, D. R., B. W. Anderson, and R. D. Ohmart. 1978. Avian population responses to salt cedar along the lower Colorado River. p 371–382.In R. R. Johnson and J. F. McCormick (tech. coords.) Strategies for protection and management of floodplain wetlands and other riparian ecosystems. U.S. Forest Service, Washington, DC, USA. General Technical Report WO-12.
Finch, D. M. and L. F. Ruggiero. 1993. Wildilife habitats and biological diversity in the Rocky Mountains and Northern Great Plains. Natural Areas Journal 13:191–203.
Fredrickson, L. H. and T. S. Taylor. 1982. Management of scasonally flooded impoundments for wildlife. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA, Resource Publication 148.
Friedman, J. M., M. L. Scott, and W. M. Lewis, Jr. 1995. Restoration of riparian forest using irrigation, artificial disturbance, and natural seedfall. Environmental Management 19:547–557.CrossRef
Horton, J.S., F. C. Mounts and J. M. Kraft. 1960. Seed germination and seedling establishment of phreatophyte species. U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO, USA. Station Paper No. 48.
Hosner, J. F. 1958. The effects of complete inundation upon seedlings of six bottomland tree species. Ecology 39:371–373.CrossRef
Hosner, J. F. 1960. Relative tolerance to complete inundation of fourteen bottomland tree species. Forest Science 6:246–251.
Hubbard, J. P. 1977. Importance of riparian ecosystems: biotic considerations. p. 14–18.In R. R. Johnson and D. A. Jones(tech. coords.) Importance, preservation and management of riparian habitat: a symposium. U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO, USA. General Technical Report RM-43.
Knopf, F. L., R. R. Johnson, T. Rich, F. B. Samson, and R. C. Szaro. 1988a. Conservation of riparian ecosystems in the United States. Wilson Bulletin 100:272–284.
Knopf, F. L., J. A. Sedgwick, and R. W. Cannon. 1988b. Guild structure of a riparian avifauna relative to seasonal cattle grazing Journal of Wildlife Management 52:280–290.CrossRef
Kozlowski, T. T. 1979. Tree Growth and Environmental Stresses, University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kozlowski, T. T. 1982. Water supply and tree growth. II. Flooding, forestry Abstracts 43:145–161.
Loucks, W. L. and R. A. Keen. 1973. Submergence tolerance of selected seedling trees. Journal of Forestry 71:496–497.
Maisenhelder, L. C. and J. S. McKnight. 1968. Cottonwood seedlings best for sites subject to flooding. Tree Planters Notes 19:15–16.
Merkel, D. L. and H. H. Hopkins. 1957. Life history of salt cedar (Tamarix gallica
L.). Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 60:360–369.CrossRef
Mielke, P. W., Jr. 1991. The application of multivariate permutation methods based on distance functions in the earth sciences. Earth-Science Reviews 31:55–71.CrossRef
Ohmart, R. D. and B. W. Anderson. 1982. North American desert riparian ecosystems. p. 433–479.In G. L. Bender (ed.) Reference Handbook on the Deserts of North America. Greenwood Press. Westport, CT, USA.
Reynolds, H. G. and R. R. Alexander. 1974.Tamarix pentandra Pall. Five-stamen tamarisk. p. 794–795.In C. S. Schopmever (tech. coord.) Seeds of woody plants in the United States. U.S. Forest Service, Washington, DC, USA. Agriculture Handbook No. 450.
Robinson, T. W. 1958. Phreatophytes. U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Supply Paper 1423.
Robinson, T. W. 1964. Phreatophyte, research in the western states, March 1959 to July 1964. U.S. Geological Survey. Circular 495.
Schreiner, E. J. 1974.Populaus L. Poplar. p. 645–655.In C.S. Schopmeyer (tech. coord.) Seeds of woody plants in the United States. U.S. Forest Service, Washington, DC, USA. Agricultural Hand book 450.
Sudbrock, A. 1993. Tamarisk control I. Fighting back: an overview of the invasion, and a low-impact way of fighting it. Restoration and Management Notes 11:31–34.
Szaro, R. C. 1981. Bird population responses to converting chaparall to grassland and riparian habitats. Southwestern. Naturalist 26:251–256.CrossRef
Taylor, D. M. 1985. Effects of cattle grazing on passerine birds nesting in riparian habitat. Journal of Range Management 39:254–258.CrossRef
Tomanek, G. W. and R. L. Ziegler, 1962. Ecological studies of salt cedar. Fort Hays State colloge, Hays, KA, USA.
Van Haverbeke, D. F. 1990.P. deltoides var.occidentalis Rybd. Plains cottonwood. p. 537–543.In R. M. Burns and B. H. Honkala (tech. coords.) Silvies of North America, Volume 2, Hardwoods, U.S. Forest Service, Washington, DC, USA Agriculture Handbook 654.
Warren, D. K. and R. M. Turner. 1975. Salteedar (Tamarix chinensis) seed production, seedling establishment, and response to inundation. Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science 10:135–144.
Wetzel, R. G. (1975). Limnology. W. B. Saunders Company. Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Whitlow, T. H. and R. W. Harris. 1979. Flood tolerance in plants: a state of-the-art review. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, MS, USA. Technical Report E-79-2.