Letters to the Editor

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 65-65

First online:

In reply to hertwich & pease, Int. J. LCA 3 (4) 180 — 181, “ISO 14042 restricts use and development of impact assessment”

  • Manfred MarsmannAffiliated withBayer AG, KS-QUS, Product Stewardship Email author 
  • , Sven Olaf Ryding
  • , Helias Udo de Haes
  • , James Fava
  • , Willie Owens
  • , Kevin Brady
  • , Konrad Saur
  • , Rita Schenck

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access


Life Cycle Impact Assessment describes indicators and does not predict actual impacts. The value of an LCA is its comprehensive review of all stages of a product’s life cycle and its synoptic view of all relevant environmental issues. The current version of the 14042 draft describes the uniqueness of Life Cycle Impact Assessment approach which is distinct from other assessment techniques. The wording was designed to help users of the standard understand how and why LCIA is distinct from other assessment methods.

In closing, we would like to highlight our opinion that the present document on the level of a DIS is sound, stable and practical within the ISO 14040 series of standards. We do not agree withHertwich & Pease that the present document prevents the use of LCIA. It makes a choice regarding the exclusion of weighting across categories in order to prevent misuse in deriving inappropriate claims. And for characterisation it has achieved a well founded synthesis. In addition, we strongly believe that this standard will stimulate the international scientific discussion of LCA and will substantially contribute to enhanced and more valuable applications of LCA in the future.