The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

, 7:47

How LCA studies deal with uncertainty

Commentaries

DOI: 10.1007/BF02978909

Cite this article as:
Ross, S., Evans, D. & Webber, M. Int J LCA (2002) 7: 47. doi:10.1007/BF02978909

Abstract

In recent years many workers have examined the implications of various sources of uncertainty for the reliability of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Indeed, the International Standardization Organization (ISO) has recognised the relevance of this work by including several cautionary statements in the ISO 14040 series of standards. However, in practice, there is a risk that the significance of these uncertainties for the results of an LCA could be overlooked as practitioners strive to complete studies on time and within budget. This paper presents the findings of a survey of LCA studies we made to determine the extent to which the problem of uncertainty had been dealt with in practice. This survey revealed that the significance of the limitations on the reliability of LCA results given in the standards has not been fully appreciated by practitioners. We conclude that the standards need to be revised to ensure that LCA studies include at least a qualitative discussion on all relevant aspects of uncertainty.

Keywords

Data aggregationdata qualityimpact assessmentincomplete dataISO 14040life cycle assessmentmethodologypotential impactsuncertainty

Copyright information

© Ecomed Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Anthropology, Geography and Environmental Studies (SAGES)University of MelbourneParkville, VictoriaAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Architecture, Building and PlanningUniversity of MelbourneParkville, VictoriaAustralia