Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

THE WAY IN WHICH TEXT IS represented on a computer affects the kinds of uses to which it can be put by its creator and by subsequent users. The electronic document model currently in use is impoverished and restrictive. The authors argue that text is best represented as an ordered hierarchy of content object (OHCO), because that is what text really is. This model conforms with emerging standards such as SGML and contains within it advantages for the writer, publisher, and researcher. The authors then describe how the hierarchical model can allow future use and reuse of the document as a database, hypertext, or network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Association of American Publishers. (1986).Reference manual for markup of electronic manuscripts.

  • Barnard, D.T., Fraser, A. and Logan, G. (1988). Generalized markup for literary text.Literary and Linguistic Computing. 13:(11), pp. 26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, D. (1989). Why use SGML?Electronic Publishing. 2:(1), pp. 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, M. (1988).The author’s guide to SGML. New York: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Author/Editor. (1989). SoftQuad Author/Editor, version 1.1. Toronto.

  • Coombs, J., Renear, A. and DeRose, S.J. (1987). Markup systems and the future of scholarly text processing.Communications of the ACM 30 (11), 933–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeRose, S.J. (1989).CDWord tutorial. Dallas: Dallas Theological Seminary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisse, M. (1989). Searching for information in a hypertext medical handbook.Hypertext ’87 Proceedings. Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 1987. New York: ACM. 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb, C.F. (1981). A generalized approach to document markup.Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN-SIGOA Symposium on Text Manipulation (Portland, Oregon, 1981). pp. 68–73. New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toloboff, V. (1986). Trends and standards in document representation. In J.C. Van Vliet (Ed.),Text Processing and Document Manipulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 107–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (1986).Information Processing— Text and Office Systems — Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML). ISO 8879.

  • Prusky, J. (1978).FRESS Resource Manual. Brown University.

  • University of Chicago (1988).The Chicago Guide to Preparing Electronic Manuscripts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissman, R. (1990).Data liberation, or, Goals for a next generation software application architecture. (forthcoming).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeRose, S.J., Durand, D.G., Mylonas, E. et al. What is text, really?. J. Comput. High. Educ. 1, 3–26 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02941632

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02941632

Keywords

Navigation