A closer examination on some parametric alternatives to the ANOVA F-test
- A. De Beuckelaer
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In experiments, the classical (ANOVA) F-test is often used to test the omnibus null-hypothesis μ1 = μ2 ... = μ j = ... = μ n (all n population means are equal) in a one-way ANOVA design, even when one or more basic assumptions are being violated. In the first part of this article, we will briefly discuss the consequences of the different types of violations of the basic assumptions (dependent measurements, non-normality, heteroscedasticity) on the validity of the F-test. Secondly, we will present a simulation experiment, designed to compare the type I-error and power properties of both the F-test and some of its parametric adaptations: the Brown & Forsythe F*-test and Welch’s Vw-test. It is concluded that the Welch Vw-test offers acceptable control over the type I-error rate in combination with (very) high power in most of the experimental conditions. Therefore, its use is highly recommended when one or more basic assumptions are being violated. In general, the use of the Brown & Forsythe F*-test cannot be recommended on power considerations unless the design is balanced and the homoscedasticity assumption holds.
- BRADLEY, J.V. (1978), Robustness?,The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, vol. 31, pp. 144–152.
- BROWN, M.B. & FORSYTHE, A.B. (1974), The Small Sample Behavior of Some Test Statistics Which Test the Equality of Several Means,Technometrics, vol. 16, number 1 pp. 129–132. CrossRef
- CLINCH, J.J. & KESELMAN, H.J. (1982), Parametric Alternatives to the Analysis of Variance,Journal of Educational Statistics, vol. 7, pp. 207–214. CrossRef
- COCHRAN, W.G. (1954), Some Methods for Strengthening the Common X2-tests,Biometrics, vol. 10, pp. 417–451. CrossRef
- DE BEUCKELAER, A. (1994),Testing the Omnibus Null-hypothesis in “Non-Standard” Situations, Antwerp: RUCA-STE, 14 p. (Working Paper; 1994:08)
- GLASS, G.V., PECKHAM, P.D. & SANDERS, J.R. (1972), Consequences of Failure to Meet Assumptions Underlying the Fixed Effects Analysis of Variance and Covariance,Review of Educational Research, vol. 42, pp. 237–287.
- JACCARD, J, BECKER, M.A., WOOD, G. (1984), Pairwise Multiple Comparison Procedures: A Review,Psychological Bulletin, vol. 96, number 3, pp. 589–596. CrossRef
- KENNY, D.A. & JUDD, C.M. (1986), Consequences of Violating the Independence Assumption in Analysis of Variance,Psychological Bulletin, vol. 99, number 3, pp. 422–431. CrossRef
- KESELMAN, H.J., ROGAN, J.C. & FEIR-WALSCH, B.J. (1977), An Evaluation of Some Nonparametric and Parametric Tests for Location Equity,The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, vol. 30, pp. 213–221.
- KINDERMAN, A.J. & RAMAGE, J.G. (1976), Computer Generation of Normal Random Variates,Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 71, number 356, pp. 893–896. CrossRef
- LAW, A.M. & KELTON, W.D. (1991),Simulation Modeling & Analysis, New York, McGraw-Hill, 759 p.
- MAXWELL, S.E. & DELANEY, H.D. (1990),Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data, California, Wadsworth, 902 p.
- MILLIGAN, G.W., WONG, D.S. & THOMPSON, P.A. (1987), Robustness Properties of Nonorthogonal Analysis of Variance,Psychological Bulletin, vol. 101, number 3, pp. 464–470. CrossRef
- OLEJNIK, S.F. (1987), Conditional ANOVA for Mean Differences When Population Variances Are Unknown,Journal of Experimental Education, vol. 55, number 3, pp. 141–148.
- ROGAN, J.C. & KESELMAN, H.J. (1977), Is the ANOVA F-test Robust to Variance Heterogeneity When Sample Sizes are Equal?: An Investigation via a Coefficient of Variation,American Educational Research Journal, vol. 14, number 4, pp. 493–498.
- TOMARKEN, A.J. & SERLIN, R.C. (1986), Comparison of ANOVA Alternatives Under Variance Heterogeneity and Specific Noncentrality Structures,Psychological Bulletin, vol. 99, number 1, pp. 90–99. CrossRef
- WELCH, B.L. (1951), On the Comparison of Several Mean Values: An Alternative Approach,Biometrika, vol. 38, pp. 330–336.
- WILCOX, R.R., CHARLIN, V.L. & THOMPSON, K.L. (1986), New Monte Carlo Results on the Robustness of the ANOVA F, W, and F* Statistics,Communications in Statistics— Simulation and Computation, vol. 15, pp. 933–943. CrossRef
- A closer examination on some parametric alternatives to the ANOVA F-test
Volume 37, Issue 4 , pp 291-305
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- robust analysis of variance (ANOVA)
- one-way ANOVA design
- Brown & Forsythe F*(-test)
- Welch Vw(-test)
- Monte Carlo simulation
- Industry Sectors
- A. De Beuckelaer (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Faculty of Applied Economics Computer Science and Operations Management, University of Antwerp-RUCA, Middelheimlaan 1, B-2020, Antwerpen, Belgium