Abstract
Three versions of Kuo's cumulus parameterization have been tested in a limited area model to investigate their comparative performances. Results show that the version of Anthes produces better forecasts than those produced by other versions. To identify a suitable scheme of lateral boundary conditions for the limited area model, impact of two time-invariant and two time-dependent boundary conditions have been examined. The forecasts suggest that the time-dependent tendency modification scheme, based on large-scale tendencies obtained from observed data, is a better boundary scheme for the model. Furthermore, the forecast produced with the revised version of the model incorporating improved versions of Kuo's scheme and lateral boundary conditions shows an overall improvement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anthes R A 1977 A cumulus parameterization scheme utilizing a one-dimensional cloud model;Mon. Weather Rev. 105 270–286
Arakawa A and Mintz Y 1974 The UCLA atmospheric general circulation model; Notes distributed at Workshop 26 March–4 April 1974, University of California, Los Angeles
Arakawa A and Lamb V R 1977 Computational design of the basic dynamical processes of the UCLA general circulation model;Methods in computational physics (New York: Academic Press) pp 174–265
Arunkumar 1989 Documentation of the FSU limited area model: FSU Rept. No.89-4, Dept. Meteorol., FSU, Tallahassee, Florida pp 302
Asselin R 1972 Frequency filter for time integrations;Mon. Weather Rev. 100 487–490
Davies H C 1983 Limitations of some common lateral boundary schemes used in regional NWP models;Mon. Weather Rev. 111 1001–1012
Grell G A, Kuo Y H and Pasch R J 1991 Semiprognostic tests of cumulus parameterization schemes in the middle latitudes;Mon. Weather Rev. 119 5–31
Kanamitsu M, Tada K, Kudo T, Sato N and Isa S 1983 Description of the JMA operational spectral model;J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. Ser. II 61 812–827
Krishnamurti T N, Ramanathan Y, Pan H L, Pasch R J and Molinari J 1980 Cumulus parameterization and rainfall rates I;Mon. Weather Rev. 108 465–472
Krishnamurti T N, Low-Nam S and Pasch R 1983a Cumulus parameterization and rainfall rates II;Mon. Weather Rev. 111 815–828
Krishnamurti T N, Cocke S, Pasch R and Low-Nam S 1983b Precipitation estimates from raingauge and satellite observations; Rept. No. 83-7, Dept. Meteorol., FSU, Tallahassee Florida, pp 373
Krishnamurti T N, Kumar A, Yap K S, Dastoor A P, Davidson N and Sheng J 1989 Performance of a high resolution mesoscale tropical prediction model; Dept. Meteorol., FSU, Tallahassee, Florida, pp 123
Kuo H L 1965 On formation and intensification of tropical cyclones through latent heat release by cumulus convection;J. Atmos. Sci. 22 40–63
Kuo H L 1974 Further studies of the parameterization of the influence of cumulus convection on large scale flow;J. Atmos. Sci. 31 1232–1240
Kurihara Y, Keer C L and Bender M A 1989 An improved numerical scheme to treat open lateral boundary of a regional model;Mon. Weather Rev. 117 2714–2722
Perkey D J and Kreitzberg C W 1976 A time-dependent lateral boundary scheme for limited-area primitive equation models;Mon. Weather Rev. 104 746–755
Singh S S, Vaidya S S and Rajagopal E N 1990 A limited area model for monsoon prediction;Adv. Atmos. Sci. 7 111–126
Slingo J M, Mohanty U C, Tiedtke M and Pearce R P 1988 Prediction of the 1979 summer monsoon onset with modified parameterization schemes;Mon. Weather Rev. 116 328–346
Sundstrom A and Elvius T 1979 Computational problems related to limited area modelling; Numerical methods used in atmospheric models, Vol II, GARP Publ. Ser. No. 17, ICSU/WMO, pp 381–416
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rajagopal, E.N., Singh, S.S. Cumulus convection and lateral boundary conditions in a limited area model. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Earth Planet Sci.) 100, 235–253 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02895985
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02895985