Victimization risks and routine activities: A theoretical examination using a gender-specific and domain-specific model
- Elizabeth Ehrhardt Mustaine
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This paper examines female and male victimization risks in general and in three domains: home, work, and leisure/public. In doing so, the analysis is based on a popular victimization model: the routine activities/lifestyle theory of victimization. There are several critiques of the routine activities/lifestyle theory research at present. Most tests of this theory use a sample of victims that does not distinguish between specific populations. Further, research on victimization risks needs domainspecific models of victimization because lifestyle can encompass a large variety of behaviors in several different settings, all of which do not have the same risk of victimization (Lynch, 1987). Analyses using data from the National Crime Survey’s Victim Risk Supplement (1983) indicate the importance of analyzing specific populations and domains in any evaluation of routine activities/lifestyle victimization theory because the determinants of victimization are not identical between men and women or between the domains of home, work, and leisure/public.
- Biderman, A. D. (1967).Report on a pilot study in the District of Columbia on victimization and attitudes on law enforcement. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
- Block, R., Felson, M., & Block, C. R. (1984). Crime victimization rates for incumbents of 246 occupations.Social Science Research, 69, 442–451.
- Clarke, R., Eckblom, P., Hough, M., & Mayhew, P. (1985). Elderly victims of crime and exposure to risk.Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 24, 1–9. CrossRef
- Cohen, L., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach.American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608. CrossRef
- Cohen, L., & Cantor, D. (1980). The determinants of larceny: An empirical and theoretical study.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 17, 140–159. CrossRef
- Cohen, L., & Cantor, D. (1981). Residential burglary in the United States: Life-style and demographic factors associated with the probability of victimization.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 17, 113–127. CrossRef
- Cohen, L., Cantor, D., & Kleugel, J. (1981). Robbery victimization in the U.S.: An analysis of a nonrandom event.Social Science Quarterly, 62, 644–657.
- Cohen, L., Kleugel, J., & Land, K. (1981). Social inequality and predatory criminal victimization: An exposition and test of a formal theory.American Sociological Review, 46, 505–524. CrossRef
- Collins, J. J., Cox, B. G., & Langan, P.A. (1987). Job activities and personal crime victimization: Implications for theory.Social Science Research, 16, 345–360. CrossRef
- Corrado, R., Roesch, R., Glackman, W., Evans, J., & Leger, G. (1980). Life styles and personal victimization: A test of the model with Canadian survey data.Journal of Crime and Justice, 3, 129–139.
- DeKeseredy, W. S. (1989). Dating life events stress, informational support and premarital woman abuse: A test of the buffering hypothesis.International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 19, 85–94.
- DeKeseredy, W. S., & Kelly, K. (1993). Woman abuse in university and college dating relationships: The contribution of the ideology of family patriarchy.Journal of Human Justice, 4(2), 25–52. CrossRef
- Ennis, P. (1967).Report of a national crime survey on crime victimization in the United States. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
- Felson, M. (1994).Crime and everyday life: Insight and implications for society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
- Garofalo, J., Siegel, L., & Laub, J. (1987). School-related victimizations among adolescents: An analysis of National Crime Survey (NCS) narratives.Journal of Qualitative Criminology, 5(4), 321–338. CrossRef
- Gartner, R., Baker, K., & Pampel, F. (1990). Gender stratification and the gender gap in homicide victimization.Social Problems, 37, 593–612. CrossRef
- Gartner, R., & McCarthy, B. (1991). The social distribution of femicide in urban Canada, 1921–1988.Law and Society Review, 25(2), 287–311. CrossRef
- Gottfredson, M. (1984).Victims of crime: The dimensions of risk. London: Her Majesty’s Stationer.
- Hindelang, M., Gottfredson, M., & Garofalo, J. (1978).Victims of personal crime: An empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
- Jensen, G. F., & Brownfield, D. (1986). Gender, lifestyles, and victimization: Beyond routine activity.Violence and Victims, 2, 85–99.
- Kaufman, R. L. (1993).Fortran program for calculating standardized and semi-standardized coefficients for logistic regression. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, Department of Sociology.
- Laub, J. (1990). Patterns of criminal victimization in the United States. In W. B. Skogan, A. J. Lurigio, & R. C. Davis (Eds.),Victims of crime: Problems, policies, and programs (pp. 23–49). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Lynch, J. P. (1987). Routine activity and victimization at work.Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 3, 283–300. CrossRef
- Massey, J. L., Krohn, M. D., & Bonati, L. (1989). Property crime and the routine activities of individuals.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 26, 378–400. CrossRef
- Maxfield, M. (1987). Household composition, routine activity, and victimization: A comparative analysis.Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 3, 301–320. CrossRef
- Miethe, T. D., & Meier, R. F. (1990). Opportunity, choice, and criminal victimization: A test of a theoretical model.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 27, 243–266. CrossRef
- Miethe, T. D., Stafford, M. C., & Long, J. S. (1987). Social differentiation in criminal victimization: A test of routine activities/lifestyle theories.American Sociological Review, 52, 184–194. CrossRef
- Miethe, T. D., Stafford, M. C., & Sloane, D. (1990). Lifestyle changes and risks of criminal victimization.Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 6(4), 357–376. CrossRef
- Messner, S. F., & Tardiff, K. (1985). The social ecology of urban homicide: An application of the “routine activities” approach.Criminology, 2, 241–267. CrossRef
- Peterson, R. D., & Bailey, W. C. (1992). Rape and dimensions of gender socioeconomic inequality in U.S. metropolitan areas.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29, 162–177. CrossRef
- Riley, D. (1987). Time and crime: The link between teenager lifestyle and delinquency.Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 3, 339–354. CrossRef
- Rountree, P. W., Land, K. C., & Miethe, T. D. (1994). Macro-micro integration in the study of victimization: A hierarchical logistic model analysis across Seattle neighborhoods.Criminology, 52(3), 387–414. CrossRef
- Sampson, R. J., & Wooldredge, J. D. (1987). Linking the micro- and macro-level dimensions of lifestyle — Routine activity and opportunity models of predatory victimization.Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 3(4), 371–393. CrossRef
- Schwartz, M. D., & Pitts, V. L. (1995). Exploring a feminist routine activities approach to explaining sexual assault.Justice Quarterly, 12(1), 9–39. CrossRef
- Stanko, E. A. (1988). Fear of crime and the myth of the safe home. In K. Yllo & M. L. Bograd (Eds.),A Feminist Critique of Criminology (pp. 75–88). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Wooldredge, J. D., Cullen, F. T., & Latessa, E. J. (1992). Research note: Victimization in the workplace: A test of routine activities theory.Justice Quarterly, 9(2), 325–335. CrossRef
- Victimization risks and routine activities: A theoretical examination using a gender-specific and domain-specific model
American Journal of Criminal Justice
Volume 22, Issue 1 , pp 41-70
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Sociology, 405 HFA, University of Central Florida, 32816-1360, Orlando, FL