Could the Aristotelian square of opposition be translated into Chinese?
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
To translate the Aristotelian square of opposition into Chinese requires restructuring the Aristotelian system of genus-species into the Chinese way of classification and understanding of the focus-field relationship. The feature of the former is on a “tree” model, while that of the later is on the focusfield model. Difficulties arise when one tries to show contraries betweenA- type and E-type propositions in the Aristotelian square of opposition in Chinese, because there is no clear distinction between universal and particular in a focus-field structure of thinking. If there could be a chance to discuss the analytic identity between the two logical systems, then it might be only constituted during a face to face conversation in the present, or, in other words, in the translation of particular propositions (singular subjective,I-type, andO-type propositions) in a particular case. The best hope for a translator is that in the actual temporally situated practice,now he or she might find a temporary way to map the concepts of one to the other with relatively little loss of structure.
- Ackrill, J. L. (1966) Aristotle’s Categories and De Interpretatione. Clarendon Press, Oxford
- Auyang, Sunny Y. (1998) The Foundations of Complex Systems Theories. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
- Barnes, Jonathan eds. (1984) Complete Works of Aristotle. Princeton University Press, Princeton
- Barnes, Jonathan eds. (1975) Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics. Clarendon Press, Oxford
- Barwise, Jon, Etchmendy, John (1999) Language Proof and Logic. CSLI Publications, Stanford
- Chang, Tung-sun. 1939. “A Chinese Philosopher’s Theory of Knoweldge.”Yenching Juanal of Social Studies I.2.
- Copi, I. M. (1990) Introduction to Logic. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York
- Feng, Qi (1983) The Logical Development of Chinese Ancient Philosophy. Shanghai Renmin Chubanshe, Shanghai
- Graham, A. C. (1978) Later Mohist Logic, Ethics, and Science. SOAS, Hong Kong & London
- Graham, A. C. (1986) Chuang-Tzu: The Inner Chapters. Mandata, London
- Griffin, James (1964) Wittgenstein’s Logical Atomism. Clarendon Press, Oxford
- Hall, David L., Ames, Roger T. (1995) Anticipating China. State University of New York Press, Albany, New York
- Tiles, Mary Images of Reason in Western Culture. In: Deutsch, Eliot eds. (1997) Introduction to World Philosophies. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
- Watson, Burton (1963) Mo Tzu: Basic Writings. Columbia University Press, New York
- Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1974) Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Humanities Press International, Inc., Atlantic Highland, New Jersey
- Yuan, Ke (1985) The Dictionary of Chinese Myth and Legend. Shanghai Cishu Chubanshe, Shanghai
- Could the Aristotelian square of opposition be translated into Chinese?
Volume 4, Issue 1 , pp 137-149
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links