Literature Cited
Armstrong Nurseries. 1958–60.Hibiscus Henderson Hybrids. Ontario and San Marino, Calif, p. 18, 1958; p. 20A, 1959–60. (Catalogs)
Bartram, John & Son. 1807.Hibiscus palustris. Philadelphia, Pa. p. 19. (Catalog)
Bates, D. M. 1965. Notes on the cultivated Malvaceae. I.Hibiscus. Baileya13(2,3): 57–130.
Bliss, B. K. 1871.H. palustris roseus. Springfield, Mass. p. 34. (Catalog)
Britton, N. L. 1903. The Rose Mallows. Jour. N. Y. Bot. Garden4: 219–220. Plates 17–18.
Clausen, R. T. 1949. Checklist of the vascular plants of the Cayuga Quadrangle. Cornell Univ. Agric. Expt. Sta. Mem. 291. 87 pp.
Darby, R. H. 1969.Hibiscus ‘Lord Baltimore.’ College Park, Md. (Personal Communication)
Dodge, C. R. 1897. Useful Fiber Plants of the World. U.S. Dept. Agr. Report No. 9, 361 pp., illus.
Fernald, M. L. 1942.Hibiscus moscheutos andH. palustris. Rhodora44: 266–278.
Harrison, R. E. & Co. 1960.Hibiscus Henderson’s Hybrids, Palmerton North, New Zealand, p. 16. (Catalog)
Hemming, E. S. 1952. The Perfect Mallow (Hibiscus) Marvel. Plant Life.8: 153–154.
—. 1959. The Hardy Herbaceous Mallows. Natl. Hort. Mag.38(3): 143–144.
Henderson, W. H. 1942. New Hibiscus. The Arboretum Bull.5(3): 8, 31.
-. 1948. GrowingHibiscus in Fresno. Golden Gard.12: 332 pp.
—. 1951.Hibiscus. Jour. Calif. Hort. Soc.12: 120–121.
Herb, M. 1926–31.Hibiscus grandiflorus albus, p. 38, 1926–27;H. moscheutos roseus, p. 38, 1926–27;H. palustris hybridus, p. 38, 1926–27;H. grandiflorus ruber, p. 4, 1930–31. Naples, Italy. (Catalogs)
Hochreutiner, B. P. G. 1900. Revision du genreHibiscus. Ann. Conserv. Jard. Bot. Genève.4: 23–191.
Howell, V. F., Maj. 1956.Hibiscus Henderson’s X Hemming Red. Surrey, England, p. 1. (Catalog)
Jacobs, M. L. & H. M. Burlage. 1958. Index of Plants of North Carolina with Reputed Medicinal Uses. Chapel Hill, N. C. 322 pp.
Kennedy, C. S. 1960. Adventures with Hardy HerbaceousHibiscus. Amer. Hort. Mag.39(4): 199–203.
Kuwada, H. 1964. Studies on interspecific and intergeneric hybridization in the Malvaceae. VII. The newly artificially raised amphidiploid plant named “Ai-Fuyo” (H. muta-moscheutos) obtained from the progeny ofH. mutabilis XH. moscheutos. Jap. Jour. Breeding14(1): 27–32.
—. 1964. Studies on the cause and mechanism of poor plant growth of the F1 hybrids obtained from the crosses betweenH. coccineus (H. coccinea) andH. moscheutos (H. moschata). Jap. Jour. Breeding14(2): 55–61.
—. 1967. The new amphidiploid plant named “Momiji-Fuyo”: (H. mutacoccineus Kuwada). Obtained from the progeny ofH. mutabilis X H. coccineus. Jap. Soc. Hort. Sci. Jour.36(2): 89–94.
Marshall, W. E. & Co., Inc. 1921.Hibiscus Marshall’s Rainbow grandiflorus Hybrids. New York, p. 40. (Catalog)
Martin, J. H. Co. 1960.Hibiscus Martin’s Giant Hybrid. Pinesville, Ohio. Fall. (Catalog)
McFadden, S. E., Jr. 1955. New Hybrids of AmericanHibiscus spp. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc.68: 366–369.
-. 1959. Promising Gator Hybrid selections of perennial Hibiscus in final test plantings at 3 locations. Sunshine State Agr. Res. Rpt. July. 4–5.
-. 1959. Propagating perennial Hibiscus from stem cuttings. Sunshine State Agr. Res. Rpt. October. 12–14.
Meehan Nursery, Thomas. 1907–1910.Hibiscus Meehan’s Mallow Marvels, p. 74, Aug. 1907;H. Mallow Marvel (pink, red, white) p. 42, 1909;H. Meehan’s Mallow Marvels. Back cover, illus. in color, 1910. Philadelphia, Pa. (Catalogs)
Oakhurst Gardens. 1960.Hibiscus Mallow Marvel Henderson’s Giant. Arcadia, Calif. p. 27. (Catalog)
Pearce, R. D. 1944–1947.Hibiscus Avalon Hybrids, p. 50, 1944; ‘Avalon Red’ p. 35, 1947. Merchantsville, N. J. (Catalog)
Pearce Seed Co. 1953–1959.Hibiscus F1 Avalon, p. 45, 1953; H. Avalon Crimson-Leaf, p. 15, 1959. Moorestown, N. J. (Catalogs)
Perry, Margaret. 1962. A coming spectacular: New hardy Hibiscus. Flower Grower.49(1): 14, 16, 17. Illus.
Prince, W. 1820–1827.H. moscheutos andH. palustris, p. 15, 1820;H. militaris, p. 55, 1822;H. grandiflorus, p. 106, 1825;H. moscheutos alba, H. moscheutos rubra, H. palustris var.rosea pallida, p. 152, 1827. Flushing, Long Island, N. Y. (Catalogs)
Riegel Plant Co. 1951–66.Hibiscus ‘Red Glory,’ 1951;H. Henderson Hybrids, 1952; p. 16, 1959; p. 16, 1961; p. 6, 1966;H. Henderson’s Mutabilis Hybrid, p. 16, 1959. Experiment, Ga. (Catalogs)
Rusanov, F. N. 1953. Hybrid hibiscus their investigation and culture. Uzbekian SSR Botanical Garden, Tashkent. 67 pp. illus.
—. 1961. Hybridization and breeding ofHibiscus andYucca species. Moscow. Clav. Bot. Sad. B. 36–40.
-. 1965. Hybrid Hibiscus. Academy of Sciences, Uzbekian SSR, Tashkent. 83 pp. illus.
Stanek’s Garden Center. 1969.Hibiscus Martin’s Giants, p. 27, Spokane, Wash. (Catalog)
Stout, A. B. 1917. Notes regarding variability of the Rose Mallows. Torreya17(8): 142–148.
Swartz Nursery, The. 1952.Hibiscus (Mallow) Martin’s Giant Hybrids. Kenosha, Wisc. p. 13. (Catalog)
Vanden Berghen, C. 1966. Notes on the vegetation of southwestern France. IV.Hibiscus palustris in the Department of Landes. Brussels Jard. Bot. Etat. Bull.36(2): 195–205.
Wright, C. H. & D. Dewar. 1894. Johnson’s Gardener’s Dictionary. Rev. ed. p.481.
Wyomissing Nursery. 1915-1918.Hibiscus (Mallow) New Giant Flowering, p.68, 1915;H. (Mallow) Crimson Eye, p.71, 1917–18. Wyomissing, Pa. (Catalogs)
Yates, Arthur & Co. 1931–1932.Hibiscus moscheutos Carminea andH. moscheutos coccinea. p. 92. Auckland, N. Z. (Catalog)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Winters, H.F. Our hardy Hibiscus species as ornamentals. Econ Bot 24, 155–164 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860595
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860595