The Indigo of Commerce in Colonial North America
- David H. Rembert
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
It can be demonstrated that the Indigo of Commerce in Colonial North America consisted of three species in the genusIndigofera. One of these was a native plant,I. Caroliniana Mill, while the other two were introduced.Indigofera tinctoria L. (French Indigo), an Old World species, andI. Suffruticosa Mill. (Guatemala Indigo), a New World species, were both introduced into South Carolina in the late 17th and early 18th centuries. Their cultivation flourished until the American Revolution. Neither of the introduced species has become naturalized in the Carolinas.
- Born, W. 1937. Use of purple among the Indians of Central America, Ciba Rev. 4: 125–127.
- Burkill, I. H. 1935. Dictionary of the economic products of the Malay Peninsula. Vol. 2: 1252–1260.
- Castaneda, R. R. 1965. Flora del Centro de Bolivar. Bogota.
- Clokie, H. N. 1964. An account of the herbaria of the Department of Botany in the University of Oxford. Univ. of Oxford Press.
- Copenhaver, J. E. 1930. Culture of indigo in the provinces of South Carolina and Georgia. Industr. & Engin. Chem. 22: 894–899.
- Davis, W. A. 1918. The present position and future prospects in the natural indigo industry. Agric. J. India. 8: 32–46.
- DuBose, S. 1858. Address to black oak agricultural society.In: T. G. Thomas. Huguenots of South Carolina. Knickerbocker Press. New York.
- Emmart, E. W. 1964. Notes on Aztec dye plants.In: Dye plants and dyeing—A Handbook. PI. & Gard. 20(3): 83–85.
- Huneycutt, D. W. 1949. The economics of the indigo industry in South Carolina. M.A. thesis. Univ. of South Carolina, Columbia.
- Langman, I. K. 1964. A selected guide to the literature of the flowering plants of Mexico. Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.
- Leggett, W. F. 1944. Ancient and medieval dyes. Chemical Publishing Co.
- Leix, A. 1938. Oriental dye markets of the Middle Ages. Ciba Rev. 10: 330–334.
- Leonard, M. H. 1895. An old industry. Popular Sci. Monthly 46(49): 649–658.
- Neuburger, M. C. 1938. Medieval dyeing techniques. Ciba Rev. 10: 337–340.
- Palmer, E. 1878. Plants used by the Indians of the United States. Amer. Naturalist. 12: 646–655. CrossRef
- Prain, D. & E. Baker. 1902. Notes inIndigofera. J. Bot. 40: 60–67; 136–144.
- Rembert, D. H., Jr. 1978.Indigofera suffruticosa Mill.—An 18th century specimen from Virginia. Pl. Sei. Bull. 24(1).
- Rogers, G. C. 1970. The History of Georgetown County South Carolina. Univ. of South Carolina Press, Columbia.
- Savage, H., Jr. 1956. River of the Carolinas: the Santee. Rinehart & Co., Inc.
- Sharrer, G. T. 1971. Indigo in Carolina, 1671–1796. South Carolina Hist. Mag. 72(2):94–1033.
- Standley, P. C. 1928. Flora of Panama Canal Zone. Contr. U.S. Natl. Herb. 27: 208.
- Stern, W. T. 1970. Ventenat’s “Decas Generum Nororum” (1808). Pp. 343–352.In: P. Smit & R. T. Ch., editors. Essays in Biohistory and other contributions.
- Stumpf, S. O. 1976. Implications of King George’s war for the Charleston mercantile community. South Carolina Hist. Mag. 77(3): 161–188.
- Towle, M. A. 1961. The Ethnobotany of Pre-Columbian Peru. Aldine Publishing Co., Chicago.
- Watt, G. 1890. Indigo. Dictionary of the economic products of India. 4: 383–469.
- Wescher, H. 1939. Dyeing in France before Colbert. Ciba Rev. 18: 618–625.
- The Indigo of Commerce in Colonial North America
Volume 33, Issue 2 , pp 128-134
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- David H. Rembert (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Biology, University of South Carolina, 29208, Columbia, SC