The survival of a cooperative tradition in the intergroup discontinuity context
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity is the tendency, in mixed-motive situations, for groups to interact more competitively, or less cooperatively, than individuals, even though mutual competition yields worse results that mutual cooperation. The present laboratory experiment attempted to assess whether the discontinuity effect could be reduced by the establishment of an intergroup cooperative tradition. Cooperation between intact pairs of groups was induced by placing in each group confederates who successfully convinced their fellow group members of the long-term advantage of trust and cooperation. On subsequent blocks of trails, the confederate was replaced by an actual subject, and then each of the original subjects was replaced so as to simulate generational turnover. By the time all initial members were replaced, their level of cooperation had eroded to the level of groups never experiencing mutual cooperation. The results are discussed in the context of other means of reducing discontinuity.
- Axelrod, R. (1984).The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
- Brewer, M. B., Ho, H., Lee, J., & Miller, N. (1987). Social identity and social distance among Hong Kong school children.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 156–165. CrossRef
- Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.),European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1–26). Chichester, England: John Wiley & sons Ltd.
- Hoyle, R. H., Pinkley, R. L., & Insko, C. A. (1989). Perceptions of behavior: Evidence of differing expectations for interpersonal and intergroup interactions.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 365–376. CrossRef
- Insko, C. A., Gilmore, R., Drenan, S., Lipsitz, A., Moehle, D., & Thibaut, J. (1983). Trade versus expropriation in open groups: A comparison of two types of social power.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 977–999. CrossRef
- Insko, C. A., Gilmore, R., Moehle, D., Lipsitz, A., Drenan, S., & Thibaut, J. W. (1982). Seniority in the generational transition of laboratory groups: The effects of social familiarity and task experience.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 557–580. CrossRef
- Insko, C. A., Hoyle, R. H., Pinkley, R. L., Hong, G., Slim, R., Dalton, G., Lin, Y., Ruffin, P. P., Dardis, G. J., Bernthal, P. R., & Schopler, J. (1988). Individual-group discontinuity: The role of a consensus rule.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 505–519. CrossRef
- Insko, C. A., Pinkley, R. L., Hoyle, R. H., Dalton, B., Hong, G., Slim, R., Landry, P., Holton, B., Ruffin, P. F., & Thibaut, J. (1987). Individual-group discontinuity: The role of intergroup contact.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 250–267. CrossRef
- Insko, C. A., Schopler, J., Drigotas, S. M., Graetz, K., Kennedy, J., Cox, C., & Bornstein, G. (1993). The role of communication in interindividual-intergroup discontinuity.Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37, 108–138. CrossRef
- Insko, C. A., Schopler, J., Hoyle, R. H., Dardis, G. J., & Graetz, K. A. (1990). Individual-group discontinuity as a function of fear and greed.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 68–79. CrossRef
- Insko, C. A., Schopler, J., Kennedy, J. F., Dahl, K. R., Graetz, K. A., & Drigotas, S. M. (1992). Individual-group discontinuity from the differing perspectives of Campbell’s realistic group conflict theory and Tajfel and Turner’s social identity theory.Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 272–291. CrossRef
- Insko, C. A., Thibaut, J. W., Moehle, D., Wilson, M., Diamond, W. D., Gilmore, R., Solomon, M. R., & Lipsitz, A. (1980). Social evolution and the emergency of leadership.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 431–448. CrossRef
- Jacobs, R. C., & Campbell, D. T. (1961). The perpetuation of an arbitrary tradition through several generations of laboratory microculture.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 649–658. CrossRef
- Messick, D. M., & Mackie, D. M. (1989). Intergroup relations. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.),Annual review of psychology (pp. 45–81). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews Inc.
- Neale, M. A., & Northcraft, G. B. (1986). Experts, amateurs, and refrigerators: Comparing expert and amateur negotiators in a novel task.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 38, 305–317.
- Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (1993). A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit for tat in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game.Nature, 364, 56–58. CrossRef
- Osgood, C. E. (1962).An alternative to war or surrender. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
- Schopler, J., & Insko, C. A. (1992). The discontinuity effect: Generality and mediation. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.),European review of social psychology (pp. 121–151). London: Wiley.
- Schopler, J., Insko, C. A., Graetz, K. A., Drigotas, S. M., & Smith, V. A. (1991). The generality of the individual-group discontinuity effect: Variations in positivity-negativity of outcomes, players’ relative power, and magnitude of outcomes.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 612–624. CrossRef
- Schopler, J., Insko, C. A., Graetz, K. A., Drigotas, S. M., Smith, V. A. & Dahl, K. (1993). Individual-group discontinuity: Further evidence for mediation by fear and greed.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 419–431. CrossRef
- Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. (1961).Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The robbers cave experiment. Norman, OK: University Book Exchange.
- Thompson, L. L. (1990a). An examination of naive and experienced negotiators.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 82–90. CrossRef
- Thompson, L. L. (1990b). The influence of experience on negotiation performance.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 528–544. CrossRef
- Thompson, L. L. (1992). A method for examining learning in negotiation.Group Decision and Negotiation, 1, 71–84. CrossRef
- The survival of a cooperative tradition in the intergroup discontinuity context
Motivation and Emotion
Volume 18, Issue 4 , pp 301-315
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors