Spatial characterisation of natural and third-generation artificial turf football pitches
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In contrast to the situation with early artificial turf pitches, little information has previously been published on the characterisation of third-generation artificial surfaces. The spatial variation of ball rebound resilience and rotational resistance were measured here under dry conditions, late in the season, for two natural turf football pitches and a recently laid third-generation artificial turf pitch. Data for the natural turf pitches show a wider variation with position on the pitch than for the artificial pitch. The latter surface showed remarkable consistency in both quantities measured. Surprisingly, all ball rebound resilience data and some of the rotational resistance values were found to lie outside current FIFA specifications, possibly due to the level of wear in natural turf at this stage of the season. For the artificial turf, the deterioration in properties over a period of 6 months is significant and suggests more frequent testing is needed. Taking data from various pitch positions, the two measured quantities were shown for the first time, as far as we are aware, to be inversely related for both natural turf pitches. This correlation may be largely attributed to differences in the extent of grass cover and/or soil compaction. For artificial turf, the lack of variation in measured quantities with pitch position precluded the determination of any correlation.
- Andreasson, G., Lindenberger, U., Renström, P. & Peterson, L. (1986) Torque developed at simulated sliding between sport shoes and an artificial turf.American Journal ofSports Medicine,14, 225. CrossRef
- Baker, S.W. (1990) Performance standards for professional football on artificial surfaces.J. Sports Turf Res. Inst.,66, 42.
- Baker, S.W. (1991) Temporal variation of selected mechanical properties of natural turf football pitches.J. Sports Turf Res. Inst.,67, 83.
- Bostingl, R.W., Morehouse, C.A. & Niebel, B.W. (1975) Torque development by different types of shoes on various playing surfaces.Medicine and Science in Sports,7, 127.
- Canaway, P.M., Bell, M.J., Holmes, G. & Baker, S.W. (1990) Standards for the playing quality of natural turf for association football. In:Natural and artificial playing fields: characteristics and safety features, ASTM STP 1073, (eds. R.C. Schmidt, E.F. Hoerner, E.M. Milner and C.A. Morehouse), pp 29–47, ASTM, Philadelphia, USA.
- Coyles, V.R., Lake, M.J. & Patritti, B.L. (1998) Comparative evaluation of football boot traction during cutting manoeuvres -methodological considerations for field testing. In:The engineering of sport: design and development (ed. S. Haake), pp 183–190, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.
- Dura, J.V., Hoyos, J.V., Martinez, A. & Lozano, L. (1999) The influence of friction on sports surfaces in turning movements.Sports Engineering,2, 97. CrossRef
- FIFA Quality Concept. Test Methods Manual (2006) and Requirements Manual (2006) -both available at www.fifa.com/en/devlopment/pitchsection -last accessed 27/6/06.
- Valiant, G.A. (1988) Ground reaction forces developed on Astroturf. In:Science and football (eds. T. Reilly, A. Lees, K. Davids & W.J. Murphy), pp 406–415, E. & F.N. Spon, London, UK.
- Winterbottom, Sir W. (1985) Artificial grass surfaces for association football -Report and recommendations. Sports Council, London, UK.
- Spatial characterisation of natural and third-generation artificial turf football pitches
Volume 9, Issue 1 , pp 59-64
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- ball rebound resilience
- natural turf
- rotational resistance
- third-generation artificial turf
- Industry Sectors