Review of employee privacy issues: Implications for law enforcement and other public and private sector agencies
- Bobbie L. Raynes
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
It has been predicted that the number of lawsuits filed for workplace privacy violations will increase over the next few years primarily because of advances in technological innovations and a change in how workplace privacy is defined. This could have implications for law enforcement agencies as well as other public and private sector agencies. This article examines current interpretations of workplace privacy both in the public and private sectors and how courts have traditionally ruled on various types of privacy issues.
- Baggs, et al. v. Eagle-Picher Industries, 957 F. 2d 268 (6th Circuit 1992).
- Baskerville, D. (1993). 10 things your employer might not tell you.Black Enterprise, 23(11), 298–304.
- Brookler, R. (1992). Industry standards in workplace drug testing.Personnel Journal, April, 128–132.
- Henshaw, G. & Youmans, K. (1990). Employee privacy in the workplace and an employer's right to conduct workplace searches and surveillance.HR Legal Report, Spring, 1–5.
- Leggett v. First Interstate Bank of Oregon, 739 P.2d 1083 (Or.-App. 1987).
- Leonard, B. (1994). Target stores agree to $2 million settlement.HR News, September, A4.
- Litchford, R. (1994). Workplace searches in an administrative investigation.The Police Chief, January, 12.
- McNerney, D. (1994). Workplace privacy: Setting boundaries in the information age.HR Focus, 71, 1–3.
- Miller v. Motorola, 560 N.E.2d 900 (Ill. App. 1990).
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raab, 109 S.Ct. 1384 (1989).
- O'Connor v. Ortega, 107 S.Ct., 1492 (1987).
- Ott, T. (1996). No reasonable expectation of privacy in computerized messages.IPMA News, November, 6.
- Overman, S. (1996). Privacy issue can pit employer/employee rights.HR News, Winter, 9.
- Restatement of Torts (Second), Section 652G (1977).
- Rothstein, M.; Craver, C.; Schroeder, E.; Shoben, E.; & VanderVelde, L. (1994).Employment Law, West Pub. Co.: St. Paul, MN.
- Sipior, J. & Ward, B. (1995). The ethical and legal quandary of e-mail privacy.Communications of the ACM, 38, 48–54. CrossRef
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives Association, 109 S.Ct. 1402 (1989).
- Smith, L. (1993). What the boss knows about you.Fortune, 128, 88–94.
- Soroka, et al. v. Dayton Hudson Corporation, 235 Cal. App. 3d 654 (1993).
- Taibbi, R. (1993). Drug testing: Procedures and privacy issues.Current Health 2, 19, 22–25.
- Traynor, M. (1994). Computer e-mail privacy issues unresolved: How extensively can employers monitor messages?The National Law Journal, 16, S2.
- Underhill, D. & Linthorst, T. (1996). E-mail in the workplace: How much is private?HR Society for Human Resource Management Newsletter, Winter, 1–5.
- Young v. Jackson, 572 So.2d 378 (1990).
- Review of employee privacy issues: Implications for law enforcement and other public and private sector agencies
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology
Volume 12, Issue 2 , pp 19-27
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links