Expectations of recipient couples awaiting an anonymous oocyte donor match
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Our purpose was to survey recipients in an ovum donation program and report on their expectations while waiting for their potential donor recipient match.
Accepted or rejected anonymous ovum donor matches (n = 80) from January 1996 to May 1997 were evaluated. Patients generated a “wish list” of desired traits and physical characteristics. From an approved donor pool of medically and psychologically screened women, candidates were drawn upon as potential matches and presented to the potential recipient, who decided whether to accept the donor. Reasons for accepting or rejecting the donor were tallied and were compared to the patient’s wish list.
Medical history and race were ranked by 33 and 23% of recipient couples as the two most important characteristics, while 74 and 54% stated that these were among the three most important factors in a potential donor compared with other traits. Fiftyseven (71%) recipients accepted, while 23 (29%) rejected, the first donor presented to them. Eleven were subsequently given a second choice within 6 months, with 10 (91%) accepting the next presented match. Recipients waiting for a donor were just as likely to accept or reject a potential candidate whether waiting < 3 months (33%; 15/46), 3–6 months (25%; 4/16), or >6 months (22%; 4/18) (P > 0.05; NS). In all but five recipients, the reason for rejection was consistent with their top three priorities reported in their wish list.
Phenotypic, ethnic, educational, and other interests are important in the selection of an ovum donor. Recipients are proactive in their decision process, making educated and well considered decisions in spite of the limited pool and the extended time frame in waiting for an appropriate ovum donor.
- Wright, J, Alert, M, Lacers, A (1989) Psychosocial distress and infertility: A review of controlled research. Int J Fertil 34: pp. 126-142
- Sable, MM (1992) To everything there is a season. Contemp Ob/ Gyn 37: pp. 153-153
- Facchinetti, F, Matteo, ML, Artini, GP, Volpe, A, Genazzani, AR (1997) An increased vulnerability to stress is associated with a poor outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer treatment. Fertil Steril 67: pp. 309-314 CrossRef
- Lindheim, SR, Legro, RS, Morris, RS, Vijod, MA, Lobo, RA, Paulson, RJ, Sauer, MV (1995) Altered stress responses to stress in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization and recipients of oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 10: pp. 320-323
- Berger, DM (1980) Impotence following the discovery of azospermia. Fertil Steril 34: pp. 154-156
- Berger, DM (1980) Couples’ reactions to male infertility and donor insemination. Am J Psychiatry 137: pp. 1047-1049
- Sauer, MV, Ary, BR, Paulson, RJ (1994) The demographic characterization of women participating in oocyte donation: A review of 300 consecutively performed cycles. Int J Gynecol Obstet 45: pp. 147-151 CrossRef
- Brill, M, Levin, S Psychological screening and counseling for ovum donation. In: Sable, MM, Crockin, S eds. (1995) Gamete Donation. Jones and Bartlett, Boston
- Sable, MM, Kiessling, A (1993) More on compensating egg donors. N Engl J Med 329: pp. 278-279 CrossRef
- Purdie, A, Peek, JC, Irwin, R, Ellis, J, Graham, FM, Fisher, PR (1992) Identifiable semen donors—Attitudes of donors and recipient couples. NZ Med J 5: pp. 27-28
- Expectations of recipient couples awaiting an anonymous oocyte donor match
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
Volume 15, Issue 7 , pp 444-446
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- oocyte donation
- Industry Sectors