, III,R. W.
andE. S. Perry
. 1997. Presenting Measurements of Status: Report to the Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Subcommittee's Data Analysis Workgroup. Chesapeake Bay Program, Annapolis, Maryland.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. P., J. W. Woodward
, andD. J. Shultz
. 1986. Effect of discharge on the chlorophylla
distribution in the tidally-influenced Potomac River.Estuaries
Boicourt, W. C., M. Kuzmić
, andT. S. Hopkins
. 1999. The inland sea: Circulation of Chesapeake Bay and the Northern Adriatic, p. 81–130.In
T. C. Malone, A. Malej, L. W. Harding. Jr., N. Smodlaka, and R. E. Turner (ed.), Ecosystems at the Land-Sea Margin: Drainage Basin to Coastal Sea. Coastal and Estuarine Studies 55. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Boynton, W. R., J. H. Garber, R. Summers
, andW. M. Kemp
. 1995. Inputs, transformations and transport of nitrogen and phosphorus in Chesapeake Bay and selected tributaries.Estuaries
Buchanan, C. (ed.). 2000. The 1998–1999 Split Sample Study for Chesapeake Bay Program Phytoplankton, Microzooplankton and Mesozooplankton Monitoring Components. Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chesapeake Bay Program by the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin, Report 00-3. Rockville, Maryland.
Chesapeake 2000Agreement. Chesapeake Bay Program Office, 410 Severn Avenue, Annapolis, Maryland 21403, http:// www.chesapeakebay.net/pubs/chesapeake2000agreement. pdf.
Chesapeake Bay Program. 1999. Targeting Toxics: A Characterization Report; A Tool for Directing Management and Monitoring Actions in the Chesapeake Bay's Tidal Rivers. Prepared by the Regional Focus Workgroup of the Chesapeake Bay Program Toxics Subcommittee, http://www. chesapeakebay.net/.
Dauer, D. M., J. A. Ranasinghe
, andS. B. Weisberg
. 2000. Relationships between benthic community condition, water quality, sediment quality, nutrient loads, and land use patterns in Chesapeake Bay.Estuaries
Dauer, D. M., A. J. Rodi
, Jr., andJ. A. Ranasinghe
. 1992. Effects of low dissolved oxygen events on the macrobenthos of the lower Chesapeake Bay.Estuaries
, Jr.,J. W., C. A. S. Hall, W. M. Kemp
, andA. Yáňez-Arancibia
. 1989. Estuarine Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Fisher, T. R. and A. B. Gustafson. 2003. Nutrient-addition bioassays in Chesapeake Bay to assess resources limiting algal growth. Progress report: August 1990–December 2002. Prepared for Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Monitoring Program, by University of Maryland Horn Point Laboratory, Cambridge, Maryland.
Fisher, T. R., A. B. Gustafson, G. M. Radcliffe, K. L. Sundberg
, andJ. C. Stevenson
. 2003. A long-term record of photosynthetically available radiation (PAR) and total solar energy at 38.6°N, 78.2°W.Estuaries
Fisher, T. R., A. B. Gustafson, K. Sellner, R. Lacouture, L. W. Haas, R. L. Wetzel, R. Magnien, D. Everitt, B. Michaels
, andR. Karrh
. 1999. Spatial and temporal variation of resource limitation in Chesapeake Bay.Marine Biology
Fogg, G. E.
. 1965. Algal Cultures and Phytoplankton Ecology. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Haas, L. W. and R. L. Wetzel. 1993. Nutrient limitation in the Chesapeake Bay: Nutrient bioassays in the Virginia Bay system Final report to Virginia Coastal Resources Management Program, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, School of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, Virginia.
, Jr.,L. W., D. Degobbis
, andR. Precall
. 1999. Production and fate of phytoplankton: Annual cycles and interannual variability, p. 131–172.In
T. C. Malone, A. Malej, L. W. Harding, Jr., N. Smodlaka, and R. E. Turner (eds.), Ecosystems at the Land-Sea Margin: Drainage Basin to Coastal Sea. Coastal and Estuarine Studies 55. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
, Jr.L. W.
andE. S. Perry
. 1997. Long-term increase of phytoplankton biomass in Chesapeake Bay, 1950–1994.Marine Ecology Progress Series
Hillebrand, H., C.-D. Dürselen, D. Kirschtel, U. Pollingher
, andT. Zohary
. 1999. Biovolume calculations for pelagic and benthic microalgae.Journal of Phycology
Kirk, J. T. O.
1994. Light and Photosynthesis in Aquatic Ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Lacouture, R. V. 1998. The procedure for estimating carbon content of phytoplankton. Report prepared for Maryland Department of Natural Resources by the Academy of Natural Sciences Estuarine Research Center, St. Leonard, Maryland.
Lacouture, R. V. 2001. Quality Assurance Documentation Plan for the Phytoplankton Component of the Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Monitoring Program. Prepared by the Academy of Natural Sciences Estuarine Research Center for the Maryland Department of Natural Resources http: //chesapeakebay.net/data/index.htm.
Lacouture, R. V., J. H. Sniezek
, andK. G. Sellner
. 1993. Level I Report: Maryland Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Monitoring Program-Phytoplankton and Microzooplankton Component. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Benedict Estuarine Research Laboratory, Benedict, Maryland.Google Scholar
. 1997. Limnoecology: The Ecology of Lakes and Streams. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.Google Scholar
Llanso, R. J.
1992. Effects of hypoxia on estuarine benthos: The lower Rappahannock River (Chesapeake Bay), a case study.Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science
MacKiernan, G. (ed.). 1987. Dissolved Oxygen in the Chesapeake Bay: Processes and Effects. Maryland Sea Grant UM-SG-TS-87-03. College Park, Maryland.
Malone, T. C., L. H. Cocker, S. E. Pike
, andB. W. Wendler
. 1986. Influences of river flow on the dynamics of phytoplankton production in a partially stratified estuary.Marine Ecology Progress Series
Marshall, H. G. 2001. Work/quality assurance project plan for monitoring phytoplankton, picoplankton and productivity in the lower Chesapeake Bay and tributaries. Prepared for the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality by Old Dominion University, http://chesapeakebay. net/data/index.htm.
Marshall, H. G.
andR. W. Alden
, III. 1990. A comparison of phytoplankton assemblages and environmental relationships in three estuarine rivers of the lower Chesapeake Bay.Estuaries
Marshall, H. G.
andR. V. Lacouture
. 1986. Seasonal patterns of growth and composition for phytoplankton in the lower Chesapeake Bay.Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science
MathSoft, Inc. 2000. S-Plus 2000, Professional Release 2, Seattle, Washington.
Marshall, H. G.
andK. K. Nesius
. 1996. Phytoplankton composition in relation to primary production in Chesapeake Bay.Marine Biology
Molvaer, J., J. Knutzen, J. Magnusson, B. Rygg, J. Skei, and J. Sorensen. 1997. Environmental quality classification in fjords and coastal areas. Statens Forurensningstilsyn TA-1467, Norway.
Montagnes, D. J. S., J. A. Berges, P. J. Harrison
, andF. J. R. Taylor
. 1994. Estimating carbon, nitrogen, protein, and chlorophylla
from volume in marine phytoplankton.Limnology and Oceanography
Mullin, M. M., P. R. Sloan
, andR. W. Eppley
. 1966. Relationship between carbon content, cell volume, and are in phytoplankton.Limnology and Oceanography
National Research Council
. 1992. Restoration of Aquatic Systems. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Newell, R. I. E.
1988. Ecological changes in Chesapeake Bay: Are they the result of overharvesting the American oyster,Crassostrea virginica?
In Understanding the Estuary: Advances in Chesapeake Bay Research. Conference proceedings, March 1988, Publication number 129. Chesapeake Research Consortium, Gloucester Point, Virginia.Google Scholar
. 1994. Water Quality: Prevention, Identification and Management of Diffuse Pollution. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
Officer, C. G., R. B. Biggs, J. L. Taft, L. E. Cronin, M. A. Tyler
, andW. R. Boynton
. 1984. Chesapeake Bay anoxia: Origin, development and significance.Science
1999. January 7, 1999 memo to Data Analysis Work Group entitled “Summary of Flow Characterization for 1985–1996”. Chesapeake Bay Program, Annapolis, Maryland.Google Scholar
2002. Benchmarks for nitrogen, phosphorus, chlorophyll and suspended solids in Chesapeake Bay. Chesapeake Bay Program Technical Report Series, Chesapeake Bay Program, Annapolis, Maryland.Google Scholar
Ranasinghe, J. A., J. B. Frithsen, F. W. Kutz, J. F. Paul, D. E. Russell, R. A. Batiuk, J. L. Hyland, J. Scott
, andD. M. Dauer
. 2002. Application of two indices of benthic community condition in Chesapeake Bay.Environmetrics
Ryding, S. O.
. 1989. The Control of Eutrophication of Lakes and Reservoirs. Man and the Biosphere Series, Volume 1. Parthenon Publication Group. Park Ridge, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Seliger, H. H., J. A. Boggs
, andW. H. Biggley
. 1985. Catastrophic anoxia in the Chesapeake Bay in 1984.Science
228: 70–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellner, K. G.
. 1999. Dinoflagellate blooms and mucilage production, p. 173–206.In
T. C. Malone, A. Malej, L. W. Harding, Jr., N. Smodlaka, and R. E. Turner (eds.), Ecosystems at the Land-Sea Margin: Drainage Basin to Coastal Sea, Coastal and Estuarine Studies 55. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Sieburt, J. M., V. Smetacek
, andJ. Lenz
. 1978. Pelagic ecosystem structure: Heterotrophic compartments of the plankton and their relationship to plankton size fractions.Limnology Oceanography
Smayda, T. J.
1965. A quantitative analysis of the phytoplankton of the Gulf of Panama. II. On the relationship between C14
assimilation and the diatom standing crop.Inter-American. Tropical Tuna Commission Bulletin
Smith, V. H.
1998. Cultural eutrophication of inland, estuarine and coastal waters, p. 7–49.In
M. L. Pace and P. M. Groffman (eds.), Successes, Limitation and Frontiers in Ecosystem Science. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
Sprague, L. A., M. J. Langland, S. E. Yochum, R. E. Edwards, J. D. Blomquist, S. W. Phillips, G. W. Shenk, and S. D. Preston. 2000. Factors Affecting Nutrient Trends in Major Rivers of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Water Resources Investigations Report 00-4218, Richmond, Virginia.
Strathmann, R. R.
1967. Estimating the organic carbon content of phytoplankton from cell volume or plasma volume.Limnology and Oceanography
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Dissolved Oxygen, Water Clarity and Chlorophylla for Chesapeake Bay and Tidal Tributaries. Office of Water. Environmental Protection Agency 903-R-03-002. Washington, D.C.
Vaughan, D. S., J. W. Smith, and E. H. Williams. 2002. Analyses on the status of the Atlantic menhaden stock. Report prepared the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries Division for the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, Menhaden Technical Committee. Beaufort, North Carolina.
Versar, Inc. and PBS&J, Inc. 2001. Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Monitoring Program 2000 Mesozooplankton Component. Prepared for Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis, Maryland.
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. 2002. Chesapeake Bay and its Tributaries: Results of Monitoring Programs and Status of Resources. 2002 Biennial Report of the Secretary of Natural Resources to the Virginia General Assembly, Richmond, Virginia.
Weisberg, S. B., J. A. Ranasinghe, D. M. Dauer, L. C. Schaffner, R. J. Diaz
, andJ. B. Frithsen
. 1997. An estuarine benthic index of biotic integrity (B-IBI) for Chesapeake Bay.Estuaries
Wetzel, R. G.
2001. Limnology—Lake and River Ecosystems. 3rd edition, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar