Classical electromagnetic radiation in noninertial reference frames
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Customarily electromagnetic radiation is defined with reference to some inertial laboratory frame. But such a definition is too narrow to be applicable to questions concerning accelerated observers,e.g. why an accelerated observer does not receive radiation from a co-accelerating charge. It is shown in this paper that a radiation concept introduced for inertial observers by Rohrlich and Teitelboim allows an extension to noninertial (accelerating and rotating) reference frames in a natural way. The generalized concept is explicitly dependent on the proper acceleration and the rotation of the observer’s laboratory frame. The case of radiation due to an accelerated point charge is treated in full detail. Roughly speaking, radiation from a point charge is observed, when therelative acceleration (in a well-defined sense) between charge and observer is nonvanishing. The analysis of this paper requires a detailed study of the general properties of noninertial laboratory frames. The necessary mathematical framework has been developed in an earlier paper (I), using ideas introduced by DeFacio, Dennis, and Retzloff.
- J. D. Jackson:Classical Electrodynamics (John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y., 1975), 2nd Ed.
- P. A. M. Dirac:Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A,167, 148 (1938).
- S. Coleman:Classical Electron Theory from a Modern Standpoint, Rand Report RM-2820-PR (1961).
- A more detailed discussion of the historical development of the radiation concept can be found in the monograph byF. Rohrlich:Classical Charged Particles (Addison-Wesley Publ. Co., Reading, Mass, 1965).
- F. Rohrlich:Nuovo Cimento,21, 811 (1961).
- C. Teitelboim:Phys. Rev. D,1, 1572 (1970). CrossRef
- A very extensive and detailed review of this approach has been published byC. Teitelboim, D. Villarroel andCh. G. van Weert:Riv. Nuovo Cimento,3, No. 9 (1980).
- J. L. Synge:Relativity: THe General Theory (North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1960), chapt. II, §§ 10–12.
- C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne andJ. A. Wheeler:Gravitation (W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, Cal., 1973), especially § 13.6.
- M. Kretzschmar andW. Fugmann:Nuovo Cimento B,103, 389 (1989), paper I. CrossRef
- B. Mashhoon:Phys. Rev. Lett.,61, 2639 (1988);Phys. Lett. A,139, 103 (1989); andThe Hypothesis of Locality in Relativistic Physics (preprint). CrossRef
- B. DeFacio, P. W. Dennis andD. G. Retzloff:Phys. Rev. D,18, 2813 (1978);20, 570 (1979). CrossRef
- A. Kovetz andG. E. Tauber:Am. J. Phys.,37, 382 (1969). CrossRef
- T. C. Bradbury:Ann. Phys. (N.Y.),19, 323 (1962). CrossRef
- Further discussions of this paradox can be found inD. Boulware:Ann. Phys. (N.Y.),124, 169 (1980);V. L. Ginsburg:Sov. Phys. Usp.,12, 565 (1970). CrossRef
- M. v. Laue:Die Relativitätstheorie (Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn, Braunschweig, 1919), p. 162;W. Pauli:Theory of Relativity (Pergamon Press, London, 1958), p. 93 andE. L. Hill:Phys. Rev.,72, 143 (1947) stated that a uniformly accelerating charge does not emit radiation, which is inconsistent with the radiation definition by Rohrlich  and Teitelboim ; later,H. Bondi andT. Gold:Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A,229, 416 (1955) andT. Fulton andF. Rohrlich:Ann. Phys. (N.Y.),9, 499 (1960) referred to the definition of radiation in the wave zone and the local nature of the equivalence principle, which is not in the sense of the radiation definition applied here.
- D. W. Sciama, P. Candelas andD. Deutsch:Adv. Phys.,30, 327 (1981). CrossRef
- N. D. Birrel andP. C. W. Davies:Quantum Fields in Curved Space (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982).
- Classical electromagnetic radiation in noninertial reference frames
Il Nuovo Cimento B Series 11
Volume 106, Issue 4 , pp 351-373
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Società Italiana di Fisica
- Additional Links
- Special relativity
- Maxwell theory: general mathematical aspects
- Classical electromagnetism