Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative analysis of multiattribute attitude models

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the consumer behavior context, multiattribute attitude models used to predict consumer choice in multiple criteria decision making situations have produced mixed results. Prediction of consumer behavior from attitudes, consequently, has been highly debated in recent years with researchers using beliefs-only, full, and extended multiattribute attitude models. The research underlying this paper was designed to compare the predictive superiority of the beliefs-only model, the full multiattribute attitude model, and a new representation identified as the combined multiattribute/determinant attribute attitude model. Data concerning patronage of fast-food chains were collected from a student panel for seven weeks. Predictive superiority was determined by average adjusted R2 using the patronage behavior dependent variable. All models were tested in aggregated and disaggregated form.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bettman, James R., Capon, Noel, and Lutz, Richard J., “Cognitive Algebra in Multi-Attribute Models,”Journal of Marketing Research 12 (May 1975): 151–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Joel B., Fishbein, Martin, and Ahtola, Olli T., “The Nature and Use of Expectancy-Value Models in Consumer Attitude Research,”Journal of Marketing Research 9 (November 1972): 456–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, Martin, “A Behavior Theory Approach to the Relations Between Beliefs About an Object and the Attitude Toward the Object,” ed. Martin Fishbein,Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement (New York: Wiley, 1967), pp. 389–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, Morris B., “Comparing Multiattribute Attitude Models by Optiman Scaling,”Journal of Consumer Research 4 (December 1977): 165–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, Richard J. and Bettman, James R., “Multiattribute Models in Marketing: A Bicentennial Review,” in A. Woodside, J. N. Sheth, and P. D. Bennett (eds.), Foundations of Consumer and Industrial Buying Behavior (New York: American Elsevier, 1977), p. 137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazis, Michael B., Ahtola, Ollie T., and Klippel, R. Eugene, “A Comparison of Four Multi-Attribute Models in the Prediction of Consumer Attitudes,”Journal of Consumer Research, 2 (June 1975), pp. 38–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, James H. and Alpert, Mark I., “Determinant Buying Attitudes: Meaning and Measurement,”Journal of Marketing 32 (October 1968): 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Milton J., “Cognitive Structure and Attitudinal Affect,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 53 (November 1956): 367–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimp, Terence A. and Lindgren, John H., Jr., “Some Methodological Considerations and Empirical Findings Concerning the Use of the Dual Questioning Method to Identify Determinant Attributes,”Combined Proceedings: American Marketing Association 37 (1977):327–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, William L. and Edgar A. Pessemier, “Issues in Marketing's Use of Multi-Attribute Attitudes Models,”Journal of Marketing Research, 10 (November 1973), pp. 428–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lindgren, J.H., Konopa, L.J. A comparative analysis of multiattribute attitude models. JAMS 8, 374–389 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02721933

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02721933

Keywords

Navigation