Simple (−1,1)-superalgebras Article Received: 23 September 1997 DOI :
10.1007/BF02671695

Cite this article as: Shestakov, I.P. Algebr Logic (1998) 37: 411. doi:10.1007/BF02671695
16
Citations
31
Downloads
Abstract We give a description of simple nonassociative (−1,1)-superalgebras of characteristic ≠ 2, 3. It is proved that in such a superalgebra B, the even part A is a differentially simple, associative, and commutative algebra and the odd part M is a finitely generated, associative, and commutative A-bimodule, which is a projective A-module of rank 1. Multiplication in M is uniquely defined by a fixed finite, set of derivations and by elements of A. If, in addition, the bimodule M is one-generated, that is, M=Am for a suitable m∈M, then B is isomorphic to a twisted superalgebra of vector type B(Γ,D,γ). The condition M=Am is met, for instance, if A is local or isomorphic to a polynomial algebra. In particular, if B has a positive characteristic, which is the only possibility in the finite-dimensional case, then A is local and B is isomorphic to B(Γ,D,γ). In the general case, the question of whether the A-bimodule M is one-generated remains open.

Supported by RFFR grant No. 96-01-01511.

Translated fromAlgebra i Logika , Vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 721–739, November–December, 1998.

References 1.

I. R. hentzel, “Nil semi-simple (−1, 1) rings,”

J. Alg. ,

22 , No. 3, 442–450 (1972).

MATH CrossRef MathSciNet Google Scholar 2.

S. V. Pchelintsev, “Prime algebras and nonzero trivial elements,”

Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat. ,

50 , No. 1, 79–100 (1986).

MATH MathSciNet Google Scholar 3.

Yu. A. Medvedev and E. I. Zelmanov, “Some counterexamples in the theory of Jordan algebras,” in

Nonassociative Algebraic Models , S. Gonzales and H. C. Myung (eds.), Nova Science, New York (1992), pp. 1–16.

Google Scholar 4.

I. P. Shestakov, “Superalgebras and counterexamples,”

Sib. Mat. Zh. ,

32 , No. 6, 187–196 (1991).

MATH MathSciNet Google Scholar 5.

I. P. Shestakov, “Superalgebras as a building material for constructing counter examples,” in

Hadronic Mechanics and Nonpotentional Interactions , H. C. Myung (ed.), Nova Science, New York (1992), pp. 53–64.

Google Scholar 6.

I. P. Shestakov, “Prime alternative superalgebras of arbitrary characteristics,”

Algebra Logika ,

36 , No. 6, 675–716 (1997).

MATH MathSciNet Google Scholar 7.

E. I. Zelmanov and I. P. Shestakov, “Prime alternative superalgebras and nilpotence of the radical of a free alternative algebra,”

Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat. ,

54 , No. 4, 676–693 (1990).

Google Scholar 8.

E. Kleinfeld, “Right alternative rings,”

Proc. Am. Math. Soc. ,

4 , No. 6, 939–944 (1953).

MATH CrossRef MathSciNet Google Scholar 9.

K. A. Zhevlakov, A. M. Slin'ko, I. P. Shestakov and A. I. Shirshov,

Rings Close to Associative Rings [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1978).

Google Scholar 10.

R. E. Roomeldi, “Centers of the free (−1,1)-algebras,”

Sib. Mat. Zh. ,

18 , No. 4, 861–876 (1977).

MathSciNet Google Scholar 11.

K. A. Zhevlakov and I. P. Shestakov, “On a local finiteness in the sense of Shirshov,”

Algebra Logika ,

12 , No. 1, 41–73 (1973).

Google Scholar 12.

E. C. Posner, “Differentiably simple rings,”

Proc. Am. Math. Soc. ,

11 , No. 3(1), 337–343 (1960).

MATH CrossRef MathSciNet Google Scholar 13.

Shuen Yuan, “Differentiably simple rings of prime characteristic,”

Duke Math. J. ,

31 , No. 4, 623–630 (1964).

MATH CrossRef MathSciNet Google Scholar 14.

R. Block, “Determination of the differentiably simple rings with a minimal ideal,”

Ann. Math. ,

90 , No. 3, 433–459 (1969).

CrossRef MathSciNet Google Scholar 15.

S. Lang,

Algebra , Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. (1963)

Google Scholar 16.

N. Bourbaki,

Commutative Algebra , Hermann, Paris (1972).

MATH Google Scholar 17.

A. A. Suslin, “The structure of a special linear group over a polynomial ring,”

Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR ,

41 , No. 2, 235–252 (1977).

MATH MathSciNet Google Scholar © Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations There are no affiliations available