(Not) giving credit where credit is due: Citation of data sets Authors
Received: 04 April 1994 Revised: 12 June 1994 Accepted: 15 September 1994 DOI:
Cite this article as: Sieber, J.E. & Trumbo, B.E. Sci Eng Ethics (1995) 1: 11. doi:10.1007/BF02628694 Abstract
Adequate Citation of data sets is crucial to the encouragement of data sharing, to the integrity and cost-effectiveness of science and to easy access to the work of others. The citation behavior of social scientists who have published based on shared data was examined and found to be inconsistent with important ideals of science. Insights gained from the social sciences, where data sharing is somewhat customary, suggest policies and incentives that would foster adequate citation by secondary users, and greater openness and sharing in other disciplines.
Keywords credit citation data set meta-analysis secondary analysis data sharing fraud editorial standards scientific integrity Download to read the full article text References and notes
Feinberg S E, Martin M E, Straf LM L, eds. (1985)
Sharing Research Data. National Academy Press, Washington D C: 3–32.
Sieber J E (1991) In: Sieber J E, ed.
Sharing Social Science Data: Advantages and Challenges, Sage Publications, Newbury Park: 1–18, 141–150.
See Bloch E (17 April 1989)
Responsibilities of institutions and investigators in the conduct of research. National Science Foundation Notice No. 106, Washington D C.
See Publication 10;
Manual of the American Psychological Association, 3rd ed. (1983) American Psychological Association, Washington D C: 133.
e.g., Stanley B and Stanley R (1988)
Law and Human Behavior
Hedrick T E (1988)
Law and Human Behavior
Smith T W (18 June 1991) personal communication
Davis J A and Smith T W (1979)
General Social Surveys, 1972–1979: Cumulative Codebook. National Opinion Research Center, Chicago.
Chicago Manual of Style: For authors, editors and copywriters, 13th ed. (dy1982) University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Shields N E and Ahle M E (1985)
Where Credit is Due: A Guide to Proper Citing of Sources—Print and Nonprint. Scarecrow Press, Metuchen, N J.
Dodd S (1979)
Journal of the American Society for Information Science
Dodd S (1982)
Cataloguing machine-readable data files: An interpretive manual. American Library Association, Chicago.
Dodd S (1990)
14, 2: 14–17.
Smith T W and Krovitz S F (1988)
Annotated Bibliography of Papers Using the General Social Surveys, 7th ed., National Opinion Research Center, Chicago.
We thank Barbara Bailar, Patrick Bova, Sue Dodd, Jerry Clubb, Mark Frankel, Judith Rowe, Tom W. Smith and Conrad Taeuber for their comments on the manuscript. Support from a CSUH Research Award and from NSF grant DIR 9012185 (to JES) are gratefully acknowledge.
© Opragen Publications 1995