Skip to main content
Log in

(Not) giving credit where credit is due: Citation of data sets

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adequate Citation of data sets is crucial to the encouragement of data sharing, to the integrity and cost-effectiveness of science and to easy access to the work of others. The citation behavior of social scientists who have published based on shared data was examined and found to be inconsistent with important ideals of science. Insights gained from the social sciences, where data sharing is somewhat customary, suggest policies and incentives that would foster adequate citation by secondary users, and greater openness and sharing in other disciplines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and notes

  1. Feinberg S E, Martin M E, Straf LM L, eds. (1985)Sharing Research Data. National Academy Press, Washington D C: 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sieber J E (1991) In: Sieber J E, ed.Sharing Social Science Data: Advantages and Challenges, Sage Publications, Newbury Park: 1–18, 141–150.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Bloch E (17 April 1989)Responsibilities of institutions and investigators in the conduct of research. National Science Foundation Notice No. 106, Washington D C.

  4. See Publication 10;Manual of the American Psychological Association, 3rd ed. (1983) American Psychological Association, Washington D C: 133.

  5. e.g., Stanley B and Stanley R (1988)Law and Human Behavior 12, 2: 173–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hedrick T E (1988)Law and Human Behavior 12, 2: 163–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith T W (18 June 1991) personal communication

  8. Davis J A and Smith T W (1979)General Social Surveys, 1972–1979: Cumulative Codebook. National Opinion Research Center, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chicago Manual of Style: For authors, editors and copywriters, 13th ed. (dy1982) University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

  10. Shields N E and Ahle M E (1985)Where Credit is Due: A Guide to Proper Citing of Sources—Print and Nonprint. Scarecrow Press, Metuchen, N J.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dodd S (1979)Journal of the American Society for Information Science 30: 77–82;

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dodd S (1982)Cataloguing machine-readable data files: An interpretive manual. American Library Association, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dodd S (1990)IASSIST Quarterly 14, 2: 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smith T W and Krovitz S F (1988)Annotated Bibliography of Papers Using the General Social Surveys, 7th ed., National Opinion Research Center, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  15. We thank Barbara Bailar, Patrick Bova, Sue Dodd, Jerry Clubb, Mark Frankel, Judith Rowe, Tom W. Smith and Conrad Taeuber for their comments on the manuscript. Support from a CSUH Research Award and from NSF grant DIR 9012185 (to JES) are gratefully acknowledge.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sieber, J.E., Trumbo, B.E. (Not) giving credit where credit is due: Citation of data sets. Sci Eng Ethics 1, 11–20 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02628694

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02628694

Keywords

Navigation