Skip to main content
Log in

Summary

  1. 1.

    Chromosome behavior during spermatogenesis is considered in several species ofDrosophila. The material is not favorable for detailed study. Perhaps the most favorable species isD. funebris; but since the genetic behavior of this species is not well known, others are used for the main account, supplemented by observations on funebris.

  2. 2.

    Homologous chromosomes undergo synapsis in the telophase of the last spermatogonial division, as in other Diptera, and apparently remain in intimate association during the growth stages.

  3. 3.

    The sex chromosomes remain relatively condensed and attached to or incorporated in the nucleolus, which shows wide divergence in size and appearance in different species.

  4. 4.

    The autosomes become diffuse at an early growth stage and are so indistinct that no account can be given of their detailed behavior. InD. funebris they form a granulated canopy or net-like cap at one side of the nucleus and arise in prophase by the condensation of this and coalescence of the granules.

  5. 5.

    No indications of definite threads such as seen during the leptotene and early diplotene stages of many insects and other animals are found here.

  6. 6.

    It is difficult to attach any positive significance to the chromosome behavior so far as the question of genetic crossing over is concerned.

  7. 7.

    The enormous growth of the spermatocytes brings into prominence many interesting cytoplasmic structures which have been noted here but not really studied, although they merit careful observation.

  8. 8.

    The nuclear wall remains intact at both divisions, permitting a distinction between cytoplasmic and nuclear components.

  9. 9.

    In some species numerous non-chromosomal bodies (fragments of nucleolus, cytoplasmic granules, etc.) stain deeply and sometimes bear a slight superficial resemblance to chromosomes, at the first division.

  10. 10.

    Both maturation divisions are normal as far as chromosome distribution is concerned — the first division being reductional so far as known (e. g. where dimorphic sex chromosomes are found).

  11. 11.

    At the first division the chromosomes tend to be drawn out and irregular in contour, especially when long and V-shaped. And they do not, as a rule, form a flat metaphase plate, save inD. obscura and its relatives. Figures are consequently best analysed in side view.

  12. 12.

    The second division is more nearly of the ordinary type and presents no special peculiarities.

  13. 13.

    The behavior of the sex-chromosomes in the first spermatocyte prophase is such as to permit their identification on this basis alone.

  14. 14.

    The evidence indicates that Y remains relatively dense and compact while X behaves more like the autosomes. This leads to the view that Y may remain relatively inert or passive while X is more active during the growth period.

  15. 15.

    X and Y appear to be connected only for a short region, or regions; from which it is inferred that they many be similar in constitution in these regions only.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Bridges, C. B. (1916): Non-disjunction as proof of the chromosome theory of heredity. Genetics1, 1–52, 107–163.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, Ethel Nicholson (1913): A study of the male germ cells inNotonecta. Journ. of exp. zool.14, 61–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, Margaret A. (1925): Karyosphere Formation and Synapsis in the Beetle,Phanaeus. Journ. of morphol. a. physiol.

  • Huettner, Alfred F. (1924): Maturation and fertilization inDrosophila melanogaster. Ebenda39, 249–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, E. C. andHicks, G. C. (1925): The Reduction Division in relation to Mutation in Plants and Animals. Americ. naturalist59, 410–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancefield, D. E. (1922): Linkage relations of the sex-linked characters inDrosophila obscura. Genetics7, 335–384.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lancefield, R. C. andMetz, C. W. (1921): Non-disjunction and the chromosome relationships ofDrosophila willistoni. Proc. of the nat. acad. of sciences (U. S. A.)7, 225–229.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dies. (1922): The sex-linked group of characters inDrosophila willistoni. Americ. naturalist56, 211–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metz, C. W. (1914): Chromosomes studies on the Diptera. I. A preliminary survey of five different types of chromosome groups in the genusDrosophila. Journ. of exp. zool.17, 45–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ders. (1916a): Chromosome studies on Diptera. II. The paired association of chromosomes in the Diptera and its significance. Ebenda21, 213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ders. (1916b): Chromosome studies on Diptera. III. Additional types of chromosome groups in the Drosophilidae. Americ. naturalist50, 587–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ders. (1918): The linkage of eight sex-linked characters inDrosophila virilis. Genetics3, 107–134.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ders. (1920): Correspondence between chromosome number and linkage groups inDrosophila virilis. Science, n. s.51, 417–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ders. u.Moses, M. S. andMason, E. D. (1923): Genetic studies onDrosophila virilis with considerations on the genetics of other species ofDrosophila. Publ. of the Carnegie inst., Washington328, 94, 5 pl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ders. u.Nonidez, José F. (1921): Spermatogenesis in the Fly,Asilus sericeus Say. Journ. of exp. zool.32, 165–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dies. u.Nonidez, José F. (1923: Spermatogenesis inAsilus notatus Wied. (Diptera). Arch. f. Zellforsch.17. 438–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, T. H., Bridges, C. B. andSturtevant, A. H. (1925) The Genetics ofDrosophila. Bibliogr. genetica2, 1–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safir, Shelly R. (1920): Genetic and Cytological Examination of the Phenomena of Primary Non-disjunction inDrosophila melanogaster Genetics.5, 459–487.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, N. M. (1907, published 1912): The chromosomes inDrosophila ampelophila. Proc. of the 7. inte. zool. congr., Boston 380–381.

  • Ders. (1908): A study of the germ-cells of certain Diptera. Journ. of exp. zool.5, 359–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiting, P. W., (1917): The chromosomes of the common housemosquito,Culex pipiens L. Jour. Morph.28, 523–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Metz, C.W. Observations on spermatogenesis in Drosophila. Z.Zellforsch 4, 1–28 (1926). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02628169

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02628169

Keywords

Navigation