How accurate are faculty evaluations of clinical competence?
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Design:Videotaped simulated CEX containing programmed resident strengths and weaknesses shown to faculty evaluators, with responses elicited using the openended form recommended by the ABIM followed by detailed questionnaires.
Participants:Thirty-two full-time faculty internists.
Intervention:After the open-ended form was completed and collected, faculty members rated the resident’s performance on a five-point scale and rated the importance of various aspects of the history and physical examination for the patient shown.
Measurements and Main Results:Very few of the resident’s strengths and weaknesses were mentioned on the openended form, although responses to specific questions revealed that faculty members actually had observed many errors and some strengths that they had failed to document. Faculty members also displayed wide variance in the global assessment of the resident: 50% rated him marginal, 25% failed him, and 25% rated him satisfactory. Only for performance areas not directly related to the patient’s problems could substantial variability be explained by disagreement on standards.
Conclusions:Faculty internists vary markedly in their observations of a resident and document little. To be useful for resident feedback and evaluation, exercises such as the CEX may need to use more specific and detailed forms to document strengths and weaknesses, and faculty evaluators probably need to be trained as observers.
- American Board of Internal Medicine. Evaluation of clinical competence. Portland, OR: American Roard of Internal Medicine, 1986.
- Blank LL, Grosso LJ, Benson JA. A survey of clinical skills evaluation practices in internal medicine residency programs. J Med Educ. 1984; 59:401–6.
- Cooper WH. Ubiquitous halo. Psychol Bull. 1981; 90:218–44. CrossRef
- Stillman PL, Swanson DB, Smee S, et al. Assessing clinical skills of residents with standardized patients. Ann Intern Med. 1986; 105:762–71.
- Woolliscroft JO, Stross JK, Silva J. Clinical competence certification: A critical appraisal. J Med Educ. 1984; 59:799–805.
- Kroboth FJ, Kapoor W, Brown FH, Karpf M, Levey GS. A comparative trial of the clinical evaluation exercise. Arch Intern Med. 1985; 145:1121–3. CrossRef
- American Board of Internal Medicine. Evaluation of clinical competence. Portland, OR: American Board of Internal Medicine, 1985.
- Feinstein, A. Clinical epidemiology: the architecture of clinical research. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1985; 184–6, 638–9.
- Moulopoulos SD, Stamatelopoulos S, Nanas S, Economides K. Medical education and experience affecting intra-observer variability. Med Educ. 1986; 20:133–5. CrossRef
- Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Tugwell P. Clinical epidemiology: a basic science for clinical medicine. Boston: Little, Brown, 1985:22–32.
- Wakefield J. Direct observation. In: Neufeld VR, Norman GR, eds. Assessing clinical competence. New York: Springer, 1985:51–70.
- Orkin FK, Greenhow DE. A study of decision making: how faculty define competence. Anesthesiology. 1978; 48:267–71. CrossRef
- Wigton RS. Factors important in the evaluation of clinical performance of internal medicine residents. J Med Educ. 1980; 55:206–8.
- Butzin DW, Finberg L, Brownlee RC, Guerin RO. A study of the reliability of the grading process used in the American Board of Pediatrics oral examination. J Med Educ. 1982; 57:944–6.
- Borman WC. Consistency of rating accuracy and rating errors in the judgment of human performance. Organ Behav Hum Perform. 1977; 20:238–52. CrossRef
- Neufeld VR. Implications for education. In: Neufeld VR, Norman GR, eds. Assessing clinical competence. New York: Springer, 1985; 301–5.
- How accurate are faculty evaluations of clinical competence?
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 4, Issue 3 , pp 202-208
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- clinical competence
- internship and residency
- internal medicine
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. General Medicine Service, Department of Medicine, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, 20307-5001, Washington, DC