Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Objective:To identify differences between patients viewed as frustrating by their physicians and those considered typical and satisfying.
Design:This cross-sectional observational study focused on psychologically distressed high users of medical services. Frustrating patients were compared with typical and satisfying patients, using data from patient questionnaires, physician assessments, structured psychiatric interviews, and computerized utilization records.
Setting:Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, a large health maintenance organization.
Patients/participants:Study patients were in the top decile for ambulatory visits, and had elevated scores for anxiety, depression, and somatization. Among the 339 patients invited to participate in the study, 251 agreed, and 228 were rated by their physicians.
Main results:A substantial proportion (37%) of the high users were viewed as frustrating by their physicians. Physicians’ ratings of physical disease severity did not differ among the groups, but frustrating patients rated their own health status less favorably and reported more somatic symptoms and disabilities. The frustrating group utilized more medical services than did other distressed high utilizers. All three groups had a high prevalence of mental disorders. However, frustrating patients had higher rates of somatization and generalized anxiety disorder.
Conclusions:Physicians and their frustrating patients had contrasting views of the patients’ illnesses. The best predictors of physician frustration were somatization and increased medical service utilization. There is need for further research and clinical attention concerning optimal clinical management for patients with somatization.
- Groves JE. Taking care of the hateful patient. N Engl J Med. 1978;298:883–7. CrossRef
- Drossman DA. The problem patient: evaluation and care of medical patients with psychosocial disturbances. Ann Intern Med. 1978;88:366–72.
- Von Mering O, Earley LW. The ambulatory problem patient: a unique teaching resource. Am J Psychiatry. 1969;126:108–12.
- Malcolm R, Foster HK, Smith C. The problem patient as perceived by family physicians. J Fam Pract. 1977;5:361–4.
- Chrzanowski G. Problem patients or troublemakers? Dynamic and therapeutic considerations. Am J Psychother. 1980;34:26–38.
- Anstett R. The difficult patient and the physician — patient relationship. J Fam Pract. 1980;11:281–6.
- Gerrard TJ, Riddell JD. Difficult patients; black holes and secrets. Br Med J. 1988;297;530–2.
- Goodwin JM, Goodwin JS, Kellner R. Psychiatric symptoms in disliked medical patients. JAMA. 1979;241:1117–20. CrossRef
- Crutcher JE, Bass MJ. The difficult patient and the troubled physician. J Fam Pract. 1980;11:933–8.
- Schwenk TL, Marquez JT, Lefever D, Cohen M. Physician and patient determinants of difficult physician — patient relationships. J Fam Pract. 1989;28:59–63. CrossRef
- John C, Schwenk TL, Roi LD, Cohen M. Medical care and demographic characteristics of difficult patients. J Fam Pract. 1987;24:607–10.
- Robins LN, Helzer J, Croughan J, Ratcliff KS. The National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule: its history, characeristics and validity. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981;38:381–9.
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnosic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. (3rd ed revised) DSM-III-R. Washington, DC: APA, 1987.
- Derogatis LR, Rickels K, Ulenhuth EH, Covi L. The Hopkins Symptom Checklist: a measure of primary symptom dimensions. In: Pichot P, ed. Psychological measurements in psychopharmacology: problems in pharmacopsychiatry. Basel: S. Karger, Switzerland 1974;7:79–110.
- Belloc NB, Breslow L. Hochstim DJ. Measurement of physical health in a general population survey. Am J Epidemiology. 1971;193:328–36.
- Escobar JI, Burnam MA, Karno M, Forsythe A, Golding HM. Somatization in the community. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987;44:713–8.
- Katon W, Von Korff M, Lin EHB, et al. Distressed high utilizers of medical care: DSM-III-R diagnoses and treatment needs. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1990;12:355–62. CrossRef
- Katon W, Kleinman Am, Rosen G. Depression and somatization: a review. Am J Med. 1982;72:127–35, 241–7. CrossRef
- Kleinman AM, Kleinman J. Somatization. In: Kleinman A, Good B, eds. Culture and depression. Berkeley, California: University of California, 1985;429–90.
- Katon W, Lin EHB, Von Korff M, et al. Somatization: a spectrum of severity. Am J Psychiatry. 1991 (in press).
- Escobar JI, Golding JM, Hough RL, Karno M, Burnam MA, Wells KB. Somatization in the community: relationship to disability and use of services. Am J Public Health. 1987;77:837–40. CrossRef
- Barsky AJ, Wyshak G, Klerman GL. Hypochondriacs, doctors, and medical care. 1991 (in press).
- Zinn WM. Doctors have feelings too. JAMA. 1988;259:3296–8. CrossRef
- Kleinman AM, Eisenberg L, Good B. Culture, illness and care. Ann Intern Med. 1978;88:251–8.
- Quill TE. Somatization disorder: one of medicine’s blind spots. JAMA. 1985;254:3075–9. CrossRef
- Katon W, Roy-Byrne PP. Antidepressants in the medically ill: diagnosis and treatment in primary care. Clin Chemistry. 1988;34:829–36.
- Katon W. Panic disorder: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment in primary care. J Clin Psychiatry. 1986;47:21–7.
- Smith RG, Monson RA, Ray DC. Psychiatric consultation in somatization disorder: a randomized controlled study. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1407–13. CrossRef
- Frustrating patients
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 6, Issue 3 , pp 241-246
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- frustrating patients
- medical services utilization
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. the Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Department of Health Services, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington
- 3. the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington Medical School, Seattle, Washington